THIRD AND DATA

SMU game log

2009: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 5vs Stephen F. Austin31–23 W———————————33%45%
Sep 12at UAB35–33 W———————————41%42%
Sep 19at Washington State27–30 L———————————56%34%
Oct 3at #6 TCU14–39 L———————————22%54%
Oct 10vs East Carolina28–21 W———————————38%44%
Oct 17vs Navy35–38 L———————————47%40%
Oct 24at Houston15–38 L———————————47%52%
Oct 31at Tulsa27–13 W———————————32%29%
Nov 7vs Rice31–28 W———————————47%41%
Nov 14vs UTEP35–31 W———————————57%46%
Nov 21at Marshall31–34 L———————————44%45%
Nov 28vs Tulane26–21 W———————————48%55%
Dec 24vs Nevada45–10 W———————————46%48%
Season13 games8–5—————–—–———————43%44%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: SMU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is SMU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:SMU offense 43% (363 of 841)Opponent offense / SMU defense 44% (407 of 919)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 45% of 75Stephen F. Austin: SMU offense 33% of 70UAB: opponent offense 42% of 67UAB: SMU offense 41% of 75Washington State: opponent offense 34% of 68Washington State: SMU offense 56% of 80#6 TCU: opponent offense 54% of 72#6 TCU: SMU offense 22% of 55East Carolina: opponent offense 44% of 77East Carolina: SMU offense 38% of 50Navy: opponent offense 40% of 73Navy: SMU offense 47% of 72Houston: opponent offense 52% of 73Houston: SMU offense 47% of 64Tulsa: opponent offense 29% of 63Tulsa: SMU offense 32% of 69Rice: opponent offense 41% of 76Rice: SMU offense 47% of 58UTEP: opponent offense 46% of 82UTEP: SMU offense 57% of 51Marshall: opponent offense 45% of 73Marshall: SMU offense 44% of 61Tulane: opponent offense 55% of 58Tulane: SMU offense 48% of 71Nevada: opponent offense 48% of 62Nevada: SMU offense 46% of 65
Stephen F. Austin@ UAB@ Washington State@ #6 TCUEast CarolinaNavy@ Houston@ TulsaRiceUTEP@ MarshallTulaneNevada *
SMU offenseOpponent offense (SMU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Stephen F. Austin

31–23 W · 70 plays to 75
SMU offense 33% (23/70)SFA offense 45% (34/75)

at UAB

35–33 W · 75 plays to 67
SMU offense 41% (31/75)UAB offense 42% (28/67)

at Washington State

27–30 L · 80 plays to 68
SMU offense 56% (45/80)Washington State offense 34% (23/68)

at #6 TCU

14–39 L · 55 plays to 72
SMU offense 22% (12/55)TCU offense 54% (39/72)

vs East Carolina

28–21 W · 50 plays to 77
SMU offense 38% (19/50)East Carolina offense 44% (34/77)

vs Navy

35–38 L · 72 plays to 73
SMU offense 47% (34/72)Navy offense 40% (29/73)

at Houston

15–38 L · 64 plays to 73
SMU offense 47% (30/64)Houston offense 52% (38/73)

at Tulsa

27–13 W · 69 plays to 63
SMU offense 32% (22/69)Tulsa offense 29% (18/63)

vs Rice

31–28 W · 58 plays to 76
SMU offense 47% (27/58)Rice offense 41% (31/76)

vs UTEP

35–31 W · 51 plays to 82
SMU offense 57% (29/51)UTEP offense 46% (38/82)

at Marshall

31–34 L · 61 plays to 73
SMU offense 44% (27/61)Marshall offense 45% (33/73)

vs Tulane

26–21 W · 71 plays to 58
SMU offense 48% (34/71)Tulane offense 55% (32/58)

vs Nevada

45–10 W · 65 plays to 62
SMU offense 46% (30/65)Nevada offense 48% (30/62)