THIRD AND DATA

SMU game log

2010: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 5at Texas Tech27–35 L———————————48%44%
Sep 11vs UAB28–7 W———————————51%39%
Sep 18vs Washington State35–21 W———————————48%34%
Sep 24vs #2 TCU24–41 L———————————40%51%
Oct 2at Rice42–31 W———————————47%56%
Oct 9vs #24 Tulsa21–18 W———————————47%41%
Oct 16at Navy21–28 L———————————51%53%
Oct 23vs Houston20–45 L———————————50%46%
Oct 30at Tulane31–17 W———————————50%41%
Nov 6at UTEP14–28 L———————————46%48%
Nov 20vs Marshall31–17 W———————————45%41%
Nov 26at East Carolina45–38 W———————————41%55%
Dec 4at #21 UCF7–17 L———————————41%51%
Dec 30vs Army14–16 L———————————50%39%
Season14 games7–7—————–—–———————47%46%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: SMU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is SMU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:SMU offense 47% (422 of 904)Opponent offense / SMU defense 46% (445 of 968)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Texas Tech: opponent offense 44% of 84Texas Tech: SMU offense 48% of 62UAB: opponent offense 39% of 57UAB: SMU offense 51% of 71Washington State: opponent offense 34% of 61Washington State: SMU offense 48% of 62#2 TCU: opponent offense 51% of 71#2 TCU: SMU offense 40% of 63Rice: opponent offense 56% of 84Rice: SMU offense 47% of 53#24 Tulsa: opponent offense 41% of 73#24 Tulsa: SMU offense 47% of 62Navy: opponent offense 53% of 64Navy: SMU offense 51% of 65Houston: opponent offense 46% of 76Houston: SMU offense 50% of 72Tulane: opponent offense 41% of 76Tulane: SMU offense 50% of 64UTEP: opponent offense 48% of 60UTEP: SMU offense 46% of 68Marshall: opponent offense 41% of 64Marshall: SMU offense 45% of 67East Carolina: opponent offense 55% of 78East Carolina: SMU offense 41% of 74#21 UCF: opponent offense 51% of 63#21 UCF: SMU offense 41% of 63Army: opponent offense 39% of 57Army: SMU offense 50% of 58
@ Texas TechUABWashington State#2 TCU@ Rice#24 Tulsa@ NavyHouston@ Tulane@ UTEPMarshall@ East Carolina@ #21 UCFArmy
SMU offenseOpponent offense (SMU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Texas Tech

27–35 L · 62 plays to 84
SMU offense 48% (30/62)Texas Tech offense 44% (37/84)

vs UAB

28–7 W · 71 plays to 57
SMU offense 51% (36/71)UAB offense 39% (22/57)

vs Washington State

35–21 W · 62 plays to 61
SMU offense 48% (30/62)Washington State offense 34% (21/61)

vs #2 TCU

24–41 L · 63 plays to 72
SMU offense 40% (25/63)TCU offense 51% (36/71)

at Rice

42–31 W · 53 plays to 84
SMU offense 47% (25/53)Rice offense 56% (47/84)

vs #24 Tulsa

21–18 W · 62 plays to 73
SMU offense 47% (29/62)Tulsa offense 41% (30/73)

at Navy

21–28 L · 65 plays to 64
SMU offense 51% (33/65)Navy offense 53% (34/64)

vs Houston

20–45 L · 72 plays to 76
SMU offense 50% (36/72)Houston offense 46% (35/76)

at Tulane

31–17 W · 64 plays to 76
SMU offense 50% (32/64)Tulane offense 41% (31/76)

at UTEP

14–28 L · 68 plays to 60
SMU offense 46% (31/68)UTEP offense 48% (29/60)

vs Marshall

31–17 W · 67 plays to 64
SMU offense 45% (30/67)Marshall offense 41% (26/64)

at East Carolina

45–38 W · 74 plays to 78
SMU offense 41% (30/74)East Carolina offense 55% (43/78)

at #21 UCF

7–17 L · 63 plays to 63
SMU offense 41% (26/63)UCF offense 51% (32/63)

vs Army

14–16 L · 58 plays to 57
SMU offense 50% (29/58)Army offense 39% (22/57)