THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

SMUMustangs

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

American Athletic, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015SMU2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 128 teams · 382.8 yds/g · 4,594 yards)#73 (of 128 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 333 points)#119 (of 128 teams · 502.2 yds/g allowed · 6,026 yards)#127 (of 128 teams · 45.7 pts/g allowed · 548 points)#122 (of 128 teams · -17.9 /g · -215 on the season)#112 (of 128 teams · -10 on the season · 15 taken, 25 given · -0.83 /g)#34 (of 128 teams · 31:27 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#42 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#75 (of 128 teams · 446.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 128 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 128 teams · 0.320 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#122 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 128 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 128 teams · 1.305 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#48 (Total offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #6–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Scoring offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #10–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Total defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #20–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #15–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Point margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #5–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Turnover margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #2–#127. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Possession: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #12–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#125. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#92. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #61–#121. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #5–#127. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #19–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #10–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #9–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #9–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #20–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2015Cincinnati7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 537.9 yds/g · 6,992 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#78 (of 128 teams · 408.6 yds/g allowed · 5,312 yards)#91 (of 128 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#60 (of 128 teams · +2.7 /g · +35 on the season)#125 (of 128 teams · -19 on the season · 14 taken, 33 given · -1.46 /g)#46 (of 128 teams · 30:53 /g · 6h 41m on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 494.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 128 teams · 0.225 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 128 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#68 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 128 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 128 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015East Carolina5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 128 teams · 414.6 yds/g · 4,975 yards)#76 (of 128 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 329 points)#66 (of 128 teams · 400.9 yds/g allowed · 4,811 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 312 points)#71 (of 128 teams · +1.4 /g · +17 on the season)#89 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 16 taken, 19 given · -0.25 /g)#101 (of 128 teams · 28:07 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning)#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#87 (of 128 teams · 403.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 128 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 128 teams · 0.151 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#69 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 128 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 128 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Houston13–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Florida State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #21 Navy, #24 Temple · postseason: #9 Florida State)#20 (of 128 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,778 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 566 points)#53 (of 128 teams · 383.6 yds/g allowed · 5,370 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.7 /g · +276 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#37 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 7h 19m on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's passing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 511.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.249 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#32 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 128 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Memphis9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss)#19 (of 128 teams · 486.9 yds/g · 6,330 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 522 points)#77 (of 128 teams · 406.7 yds/g allowed · 5,287 yards)#67 (of 128 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#25 (of 128 teams · +12.8 /g · +167 on the season)#23 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#52 (of 128 teams · 30:21 /g · 6h 35m on the season)#35 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 381.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 128 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#65 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 128 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 128 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Navy11–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 128 teams · 425.1 yds/g · 5,527 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#40 (of 128 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 4,744 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#16 (of 128 teams · +14.9 /g · +194 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19 on the season · 27 taken, 8 given · +1.46 /g)#16 (of 128 teams · 32:48 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 306.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.326 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 128 teams · 1.165 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015South Florida8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Temple)#35 (of 128 teams · 441.6 yds/g · 5,741 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points)#52 (of 128 teams · 380.5 yds/g allowed · 4,946 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#29 (of 128 teams · +10.7 /g · +139 on the season)#13 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 25 taken, 15 given · +0.77 /g)#98 (of 128 teams · 28:14 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing production returning)#92 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#19 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 529.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 128 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#29 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 128 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Temple10–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#96 (of 128 teams · 366.7 yds/g · 5,134 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#20 (of 128 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,718 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#34 (of 128 teams · +9.7 /g · +136 on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 22 taken, 19 given · +0.21 /g)#12 (of 128 teams · 32:56 /g · 7h 41m on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 405.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 128 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 128 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Tulane3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#120 (of 128 teams · 317.0 yds/g · 3,804 yards)#113 (of 128 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 236 points)#80 (of 128 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 4,947 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 435 points)#120 (of 128 teams · -16.6 /g · -199 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.08 /g)#97 (of 128 teams · 28:20 /g · 5h 40m on the season)#64 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's passing production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 408.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 128 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 128 teams · 0.193 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#121 (of 128 teams · 35% of plays successful)#87 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 128 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 128 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Tulsa6–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 128 teams · 507.4 yds/g · 6,596 yards)#21 (of 128 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 483 points)#126 (of 128 teams · 536.6 yds/g allowed · 6,976 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 518 points)#86 (of 128 teams · -2.7 /g · -35 on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.31 /g)#109 (of 128 teams · 27:44 /g · 6h 01m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 404.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 128 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 128 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#119 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 128 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UCF0–120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 128 teams · 268.4 yds/g · 3,221 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 13.9 pts/g · 167 points)#114 (of 128 teams · 464.1 yds/g allowed · 5,569 yards)#118 (of 128 teams · 37.7 pts/g allowed · 452 points)#126 (of 128 teams · -23.8 /g · -285 on the season)#127 (of 128 teams · -20 on the season · 13 taken, 33 given · -1.67 /g)#112 (of 128 teams · 27:36 /g · 5h 31m on the season)#35 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#125 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's receiving production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#73 (of 128 teams · 484.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#127 (of 128 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#92 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.058 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 128 teams · 1.367 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UConn6–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Houston)#124 (of 128 teams · 310.3 yds/g · 4,034 yards)#122 (of 128 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 223 points)#33 (of 128 teams · 355.1 yds/g allowed · 4,616 yards)#15 (of 128 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 253 points)#84 (of 128 teams · -2.3 /g · -30 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.69 /g)#47 (of 128 teams · 30:50 /g · 6h 41m on the season)#93 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 402.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 128 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 128 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 128 teams · 1.116 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 128 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20152015 SMUAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #48
Total offense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Cincinnati #6 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #13 of 128; 2015 Memphis #19 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 South Florida #35 of 128; 2015 Navy #48 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #55 of 128; 2015 Temple #96 of 128; 2015 Tulane #120 of 128; 2015 UConn #124 of 128; 2015 UCF #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 76 of 128. American Athletic median rank 48.
Scoring offensemedian #41
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #10 of 128; 2015 Memphis #11 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #21 of 128; 2015 Navy #22 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #38 of 128; 2015 South Florida #41 of 128; 2015 Temple #60 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #76 of 128; 2015 Tulane #113 of 128; 2015 UConn #122 of 128; 2015 UCF #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 73 of 128. American Athletic median rank 41.
Total defensemedian #66
Total defense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Temple #20 of 128; 2015 UConn #33 of 128; 2015 Navy #40 of 128; 2015 South Florida #52 of 128; 2015 Houston #53 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #66 of 128; 2015 Memphis #77 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #78 of 128; 2015 Tulane #80 of 128; 2015 UCF #114 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 119 of 128. American Athletic median rank 66.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UConn #15 of 128; 2015 Temple #17 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 South Florida #35 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #54 of 128; 2015 Memphis #67 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #91 of 128; 2015 Tulane #110 of 128; 2015 UCF #118 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 127 of 128. American Athletic median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #60
Point margin. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #5 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 Memphis #25 of 128; 2015 South Florida #29 of 128; 2015 Temple #34 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #60 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #71 of 128; 2015 UConn #84 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #86 of 128; 2015 Tulane #120 of 128; 2015 UCF #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 122 of 128. American Athletic median rank 60.
Turnover marginmedian #39
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #2 of 128; 2015 Navy #3 of 128; 2015 South Florida #13 of 128; 2015 UConn #15 of 128; 2015 Memphis #23 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #39 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Tulane #58 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #89 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #125 of 128; 2015 UCF #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 112 of 128. American Athletic median rank 39.
Possessionmedian #47
Possession. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Temple #12 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 Houston #37 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #46 of 128; 2015 UConn #47 of 128; 2015 Memphis #52 of 128; 2015 Tulane #97 of 128; 2015 South Florida #98 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #101 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #109 of 128; 2015 UCF #112 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 34 of 128. American Athletic median rank 47.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tulsa #1 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Memphis #35 of 128; 2015 UCF #35 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Tulane #64 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #66 of 128; 2015 Houston #74 of 128; 2015 South Florida #83 of 128; 2015 UConn #93 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 67 of 128. American Athletic median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #74
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Cincinnati #1 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #4 of 128; 2015 Memphis #42 of 128; 2015 Tulane #71 of 128; 2015 Navy #74 of 128; 2015 Temple #80 of 128; 2015 South Florida #92 of 128; 2015 UConn #101 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #112 of 128; 2015 UCF #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 54 of 128. American Athletic median rank 74.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tulsa #1 of 128; 2015 South Florida #19 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #23 of 128; 2015 Houston #26 of 128; 2015 Tulane #27 of 128; 2015 UCF #40 of 128; 2015 UConn #50 of 128; 2015 Navy #68 of 128; 2015 Memphis #74 of 128; 2015 Temple #84 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #92 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 42 of 128. American Athletic median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #83
Team talent. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #61 of 128; 2015 Houston #65 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #71 of 128; 2015 UCF #73 of 128; 2015 Tulane #83 of 128; 2015 Temple #85 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #86 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #87 of 128; 2015 UConn #89 of 128; 2015 Memphis #96 of 128; 2015 Navy #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 75 of 128. American Athletic median rank 83.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Navy #5 of 128; 2015 Houston #19 of 128; 2015 Memphis #26 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #27 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #32 of 128; 2015 South Florida #33 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #60 of 128; 2015 Temple #99 of 128; 2015 UConn #112 of 128; 2015 Tulane #115 of 128; 2015 UCF #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 94 of 128. American Athletic median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #69
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Temple #19 of 128; 2015 UConn #32 of 128; 2015 Houston #33 of 128; 2015 South Florida #37 of 128; 2015 Memphis #66 of 128; 2015 Navy #69 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #75 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #82 of 128; 2015 Tulane #98 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #112 of 128; 2015 UCF #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 124 of 128. American Athletic median rank 69.
Offensive success ratemedian #55
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Navy #10 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #12 of 128; 2015 Memphis #25 of 128; 2015 Houston #48 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #53 of 128; 2015 South Florida #55 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #61 of 128; 2015 UConn #96 of 128; 2015 Temple #102 of 128; 2015 UCF #118 of 128; 2015 Tulane #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 93 of 128. American Athletic median rank 55.
Defensive success ratemedian #68
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Temple #9 of 128; 2015 South Florida #29 of 128; 2015 Houston #32 of 128; 2015 UConn #51 of 128; 2015 Memphis #65 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #68 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #69 of 128; 2015 Tulane #87 of 128; 2015 Navy #90 of 128; 2015 UCF #92 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 122 of 128. American Athletic median rank 68.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #37
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #9 of 128; 2015 Tulane #22 of 128; 2015 Temple #27 of 128; 2015 South Florida #28 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #30 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #58 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #69 of 128; 2015 Memphis #78 of 128; 2015 Navy #84 of 128; 2015 UConn #109 of 128; 2015 UCF #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 37 of 128. American Athletic median rank 37.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #74
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UConn #20 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #24 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #42 of 128; 2015 Navy #45 of 128; 2015 Memphis #67 of 128; 2015 Temple #74 of 128; 2015 South Florida #89 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #91 of 128; 2015 Tulane #101 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 UCF #118 of 128. Marked: 2015 SMU, ranked 109 of 128. American Athletic median rank 74.