THIRD AND DATA

Stephen F. Austin game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 28at #22 Houston0–27 L581442.525–3917–33–10573–160–327–6025:1118%33%
Sep 6at Abilene Christian20–28 L723004.233–5225–39–248166–172–5310–9225:1136%41%
Sep 13vs Sul Ross State63–0 W555349.736–24715–19–287247–91–105–7229:3857%11%
Sep 20vs Cal Poly35–17 W673545.337–16419–30–190184–141–217–8028:0938%31%
Sep 27vs McNeese34–17 W663815.837–14815–29–233194–142–218–7927:4834%31%
Oct 4at Incarnate Word31–17 W603355.633–7419–27–261155–130–107–6525:0140%37%
Oct 18vs Nicholls34–7 W643725.836–17520–28–197216–122–238–6529:1553%33%
Oct 25at East Texas A&M31–21 W924524.946–14330–46–309298–161–248–7637:0843%33%
Nov 1vs UT Rio Grande Valley41–17 W884485.146–18331–42–2652713–192–203–4538:0551%40%
Nov 8at Houston Christian50–3 W674006.047–23513–20–165215–121–1014–10331:3344%19%
Nov 15vs Lamar26–15 W783294.245–18018–33–1492510–180–112–2034:5136%35%
Nov 20at Northwestern State62–14 W646079.542–32018–22–287343–61–205–5226:0964%30%
Dec 6vs Abilene Christian41–34 W675027.532–14526–35–357236–120–0010–9326:0050%43%
Dec 12at Montana State28–44 L723444.829–10226–43–242227–151–237–3724:3247%54%
Season14 games11–39705,5025.7524–2207292–446–3,29530187–19314–2618101–9396:48:3144%35%

Success rate

SFA on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game43.6% · 34.7%
18
33
36
41
57
11
38
31
34
31
40
37
53
33
43
33
51
40
44
19
36
35
64
30
50
43
47
54
@ Houston
@ Abilene Christian
Sul Ross State
Cal Poly
McNeese
@ Incarnate Word
Nicholls
@ East Texas A&M
UT Rio Grande Valley
@ Houston Christian
Lamar
@ Northwestern State
Abilene Christian
@ Montana State

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 18.0%, defense allows 33.3%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: SFA on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is SFA's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:SFA offense 44% (409 of 939)Opponent offense / SFA defense 35% (300 of 865)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%#22 Houston: opponent offense 33% of 75#22 Houston: SFA offense 18% of 61Abilene Christian: opponent offense 41% of 75Abilene Christian: SFA offense 36% of 73Sul Ross State: opponent offense 11% of 37Sul Ross State: SFA offense 57% of 54Cal Poly: opponent offense 31% of 71Cal Poly: SFA offense 38% of 65McNeese: opponent offense 31% of 74McNeese: SFA offense 34% of 64Incarnate Word: opponent offense 37% of 82Incarnate Word: SFA offense 40% of 60Nicholls: opponent offense 33% of 48Nicholls: SFA offense 53% of 55East Texas A&M: opponent offense 33% of 57East Texas A&M: SFA offense 43% of 88UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 40% of 47UT Rio Grande Valley: SFA offense 51% of 88Houston Christian: opponent offense 19% of 52Houston Christian: SFA offense 44% of 66Lamar: opponent offense 35% of 51Lamar: SFA offense 36% of 77Northwestern State: opponent offense 30% of 63Northwestern State: SFA offense 64% of 64Abilene Christian: opponent offense 43% of 68Abilene Christian: SFA offense 50% of 58Montana State: opponent offense 54% of 65Montana State: SFA offense 47% of 66
@ #22 Houston@ Abilene ChristianSul Ross StateCal PolyMcNeese@ Incarnate WordNicholls@ East Texas A&MUT Rio Grande Valley@ Houston ChristianLamar@ Northwestern StateAbilene Christian@ Montana State
SFA offenseOpponent offense (SFA defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at #22 Houston

0–27 L · 61 plays to 75
SFA offense 18% (11/61)Houston offense 33% (25/75)

at Abilene Christian

20–28 L · 73 plays to 75
SFA offense 36% (26/73)ACU offense 41% (31/75)

vs Sul Ross State

63–0 W · 54 plays to 37
SFA offense 57% (31/54)Sul Ross State offense 11% (4/37)

vs Cal Poly

35–17 W · 65 plays to 71
SFA offense 38% (25/65)Cal Poly offense 31% (22/71)

vs McNeese

34–17 W · 64 plays to 74
SFA offense 34% (22/64)McNeese offense 31% (23/74)

at Incarnate Word

31–17 W · 60 plays to 82
SFA offense 40% (24/60)Incarnate Word offense 37% (30/82)

vs Nicholls

34–7 W · 55 plays to 48
SFA offense 53% (29/55)Nicholls offense 33% (16/48)

at East Texas A&M

31–21 W · 88 plays to 57
SFA offense 43% (38/88)East Texas A&M offense 33% (19/57)

vs UT Rio Grande Valley

41–17 W · 88 plays to 47
SFA offense 51% (45/88)UT Rio Grande offense 40% (19/47)

at Houston Christian

50–3 W · 66 plays to 52
SFA offense 44% (29/66)HCU offense 19% (10/52)

vs Lamar

26–15 W · 77 plays to 51
SFA offense 36% (28/77)Lamar offense 35% (18/51)

at Northwestern State

62–14 W · 64 plays to 63
SFA offense 64% (41/64)Northwestern St. offense 30% (19/63)

vs Abilene Christian

41–34 W · 58 plays to 68
SFA offense 50% (29/58)ACU offense 43% (29/68)

at Montana State

28–44 L · 66 plays to 65
SFA offense 47% (31/66)Montana State offense 54% (35/65)