THIRD AND DATA

Stephen F. Austin game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29at McNeese38–27 W684396.539–13718–29–302235–121–138–6731:4741%38%
Sep 5vs East Texas A&M44–7 W774345.646–25622–31–178258–172–316–5639:2844%36%
Sep 12at Abilene Christian26–7 W664597.035–21617–31–243207–140–117–4730:5041%39%
Sep 19at Prairie View A&M31–10 W644206.638–20718–26–213213–101–124–2531:0947%28%
Sep 26vs Northeastern State63–14 W5861710.629–23221–29–385266–80–027–6222:5157%37%
Oct 3vs Incarnate Word28–26 W734255.839–13426–34–291244–130–0110–9932:2238%39%
Oct 17at Nicholls56–0 W726428.940–35420–32–288305–123–4210–9029:5957%31%
Oct 24vs SE Louisiana45–24 W624327.042–27911–20–153206–120–027–5829:2550%26%
Oct 31vs Houston Christian37–6 W593305.633–11618–26–214195–121–117–4324:1939%29%
Season9 games9–05994,1987.0341–1931171–258–2,26720849–1108–111566–5474:32:1046%34%

Success rate

SFA on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game45.9% · 33.6%
41
38
44
36
41
39
47
28
57
37
38
39
57
31
50
26
39
29
@ McNeese
East Texas A&M
@ Abilene Christian
@ Prairie View A&M
Northeastern State
Incarnate Word
@ Nicholls
SE Louisiana
Houston Christian
@ Lamar
@ UT Rio Grande Valley
Northwestern State

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: SFA on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is SFA's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:SFA offense 46% (274 of 597)Opponent offense / SFA defense 34% (211 of 628)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%McNeese: opponent offense 38% of 65McNeese: SFA offense 41% of 66East Texas A&M: opponent offense 36% of 47East Texas A&M: SFA offense 44% of 79Abilene Christian: opponent offense 39% of 62Abilene Christian: SFA offense 41% of 66Prairie View A&M: opponent offense 28% of 81Prairie View A&M: SFA offense 47% of 64Northeastern State: opponent offense 37% of 87Northeastern State: SFA offense 57% of 58Incarnate Word: opponent offense 39% of 79Incarnate Word: SFA offense 38% of 73Nicholls: opponent offense 31% of 62Nicholls: SFA offense 57% of 72SE Louisiana: opponent offense 26% of 65SE Louisiana: SFA offense 50% of 60Houston Christian: opponent offense 29% of 80Houston Christian: SFA offense 39% of 59
@ McNeeseEast Texas A&M@ Abilene Christian@ Prairie View A&MNortheastern StateIncarnate Word@ NichollsSE LouisianaHouston Christian@ Lamar@ UT Rio Grande ValleyNorthwestern State
SFA offenseOpponent offense (SFA defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at McNeese

38–27 W · 66 plays to 65
SFA offense 41% (27/66)McNeese offense 38% (25/65)

vs East Texas A&M

44–7 W · 79 plays to 47
SFA offense 44% (35/79)East Texas A&M offense 36% (17/47)

at Abilene Christian

26–7 W · 66 plays to 62
SFA offense 41% (27/66)ACU offense 39% (24/62)

at Prairie View A&M

31–10 W · 64 plays to 81
SFA offense 47% (30/64)Prairie View A&M offense 28% (23/81)

vs Northeastern State

63–14 W · 58 plays to 87
SFA offense 57% (33/58)Northeastern St. offense 37% (32/87)

vs Incarnate Word

28–26 W · 73 plays to 79
SFA offense 38% (28/73)Incarnate Word offense 39% (31/79)

at Nicholls

56–0 W · 72 plays to 62
SFA offense 57% (41/72)Nicholls offense 31% (19/62)

vs SE Louisiana

45–24 W · 60 plays to 65
SFA offense 50% (30/60)SE Louisiana offense 26% (17/65)

vs Houston Christian

37–6 W · 59 plays to 80
SFA offense 39% (23/59)HCU offense 29% (23/80)