THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

SyracuseOrange

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Syracuse played 10 such games.

ACC, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Syracuse3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 300.1 yds/g · 3,001 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 149 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 431.2 yds/g allowed · 4,312 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 375 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -22.6 /g · -226 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -12 in these games · 7 taken, 19 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:15 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 727.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 17 ACC teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #11–#70. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#70. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#44 (Total defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #5–#69. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#72. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Point margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#72. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Turnover margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#71. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#70. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#124. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#130. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Team talent: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#74. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #12–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#71. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#69. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#62. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#70. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #13–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#25 (of 74 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 281.1 yds/g allowed · 2,811 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.4 /g · +164 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:03 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Clemson7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 74 teams · 409.1 yds/g · 4,091 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 3,673 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.3 /g · +53 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:57 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 918.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Duke9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#20 (of 74 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 3,668 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 309 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 422.3 yds/g allowed · 3,801 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.9 /g · +44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 18 taken, 7 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:45 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 669.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.366 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.382 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 74 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 411.4 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 6 taken, 10 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami, #24 James Madison)#31 (of 74 teams · 380.2 yds/g · 3,422 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 2,870 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +38 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 30:49 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 700.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 74 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025SMU9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Miami · postseason: #17 Arizona)#16 (of 74 teams · 418.1 yds/g · 4,181 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 325 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 401.8 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.0 /g · +100 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:19 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 136 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 136 teams · 766.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 3,747 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 323.7 yds/g allowed · 2,913 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Georgia Tech)#32 (of 74 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,786 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,622 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:31 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 681.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wake Forest9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#49 (of 74 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 2,734 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 179 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 338.6 yds/g allowed · 2,709 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.0 /g · -32 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 627.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 74 teams · 339.9 yds/g · 3,059 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 386.9 yds/g allowed · 3,482 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -4.1 /g · -37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 10 taken, 10 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 30:13 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 726.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Florida State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)#18 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 354.6 yds/g allowed · 3,546 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 828.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 74 teams · 329.9 yds/g · 3,299 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 193 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 3,881 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -118 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 136 teams · 712.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025NC State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia, #22 Georgia Tech)#36 (of 74 teams · 373.9 yds/g · 3,739 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 445.9 yds/g allowed · 4,459 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -3.7 /g · -37 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:17 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 707.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.407 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025North Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 285.4 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 170 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 356.8 yds/g allowed · 3,568 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -11.5 /g · -115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 7 taken, 14 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:56 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 136 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 136 teams · 753.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 74 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Boston College2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 365.9 yds/g · 3,659 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 458.9 yds/g allowed · 4,589 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -12.9 /g · -129 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 136 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 650.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 74 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Stanford4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 292.3 yds/g · 2,923 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.6 pts/g · 176 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 407.3 yds/g allowed · 4,073 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -12.2 /g · -122 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 11 taken, 15 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 707.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.196 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20252025 SyracuseACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2025 SMU #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Florida State #18 of 74; 2025 Clemson #19 of 74; 2025 Duke #20 of 74; 2025 Miami #25 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #32 of 74; 2025 NC State #36 of 74; 2025 Boston College #42 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #49 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 66 of 74. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #31
Scoring offense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Duke #7 of 74; 2025 SMU #12 of 74; 2025 Miami #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2025 Virginia #19 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #24 of 74; 2025 NC State #26 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 Florida State #41 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #58 of 74; 2025 Stanford #67 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #68 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 70 of 74. ACC median rank 31.
Total defensemedian #44
Total defense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #5 of 74; 2025 Louisville #9 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #18 of 74; 2025 Florida State #25 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #45 of 74; 2025 SMU #49 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Duke #59 of 74; 2025 NC State #67 of 74; 2025 Boston College #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 61 of 74. ACC median rank 44.
Scoring defensemedian #46
Scoring defense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Clemson #18 of 74; 2025 SMU #20 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Florida State #33 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #38 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #50 of 74; 2025 Duke #51 of 74; 2025 California #52 of 74; 2025 Stanford #54 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #56 of 74; 2025 NC State #58 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 72 of 74. ACC median rank 46.
Point marginmedian #36
Point margin. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #15 of 74; 2025 Clemson #20 of 74; 2025 Duke #21 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #23 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #30 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 NC State #44 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #45 of 74; 2025 California #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #61 of 74; 2025 Stanford #62 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 72 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Turnover marginmedian #40
Turnover margin. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Duke #4 of 74; 2025 SMU #7 of 74; 2025 Miami #13 of 74; 2025 Louisville #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 NC State #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #22 of 74; 2025 California #37 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #53 of 74; 2025 Stanford #53 of 74; 2025 Florida State #57 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #60 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 71 of 74. ACC median rank 40.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #3 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Louisville #24 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 NC State #34 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Duke #42 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #47 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #59 of 74; 2025 Boston College #62 of 74; 2025 Florida State #66 of 74; 2025 SMU #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 20 of 74. ACC median rank 42.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #1 of 136; 2025 SMU #35 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #38 of 136; 2025 NC State #41 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #52 of 136; 2025 Boston College #57 of 136; 2025 Florida State #65 of 136; 2025 Stanford #80 of 136; 2025 Duke #87 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #97 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 California #100 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136; 2025 Louisville #127 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 124 of 136. ACC median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Boston College #10 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #13 of 136; 2025 NC State #14 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Louisville #39 of 136; 2025 Duke #50 of 136; 2025 SMU #60 of 136; 2025 Stanford #66 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #78 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #89 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #96 of 136; 2025 Florida State #97 of 136; 2025 California #118 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 103 of 136. ACC median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Wake Forest #7 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #11 of 136; 2025 Louisville #16 of 136; 2025 Stanford #47 of 136; 2025 Clemson #48 of 136; 2025 NC State #51 of 136; 2025 Florida State #54 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #68 of 136; 2025 Duke #74 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Boston College #81 of 136; 2025 SMU #91 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #94 of 136; 2025 California #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 97 of 136. ACC median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #40
Team talent. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 Florida State #19 of 136; 2025 SMU #25 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #31 of 136; 2025 California #36 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #40 of 136; 2025 NC State #45 of 136; 2025 Stanford #46 of 136; 2025 Louisville #50 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #56 of 136; 2025 Duke #58 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Boston College #69 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #74 of 136. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 34 of 136. ACC median rank 40.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #12 of 74; 2025 SMU #14 of 74; 2025 Duke #15 of 74; 2025 Miami #18 of 74; 2025 NC State #19 of 74; 2025 Florida State #24 of 74; 2025 Clemson #29 of 74; 2025 Virginia #33 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #37 of 74; 2025 Louisville #39 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 Boston College #48 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #58 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #61 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 71 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #8 of 74; 2025 Virginia #10 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Louisville #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #19 of 74; 2025 Clemson #22 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 Stanford #37 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2025 NC State #60 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #61 of 74; 2025 Duke #62 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #65 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 71 of 74. ACC median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #42
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #9 of 74; 2025 Duke #22 of 74; 2025 Louisville #23 of 74; 2025 Florida State #30 of 74; 2025 Clemson #32 of 74; 2025 Boston College #38 of 74; 2025 NC State #39 of 74; 2025 SMU #42 of 74; 2025 Virginia #47 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #50 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #60 of 74; 2025 Stanford #66 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 64 of 74. ACC median rank 42.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Louisville #10 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #12 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #17 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 NC State #31 of 74; 2025 Stanford #32 of 74; 2025 California #33 of 74; 2025 Florida State #34 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #39 of 74; 2025 Duke #46 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #49 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #54 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 62 of 74. ACC median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 SMU #3 of 74; 2025 Duke #10 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #12 of 74; 2025 NC State #13 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #14 of 74; 2025 Florida State #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #18 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #34 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 Boston College #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Louisville #53 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #67 of 74; 2025 Miami #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 57 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #47
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Florida State #13 of 74; 2025 Louisville #21 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #24 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #29 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 Virginia #40 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2025 California #47 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #50 of 74; 2025 Miami #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #57 of 74; 2025 Clemson #61 of 74; 2025 Boston College #65 of 74; 2025 Duke #69 of 74; 2025 NC State #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Syracuse, ranked 64 of 74. ACC median rank 47.