Metrics

TempleOwls

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Temple840 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 120 teams · 334.1 yds/g · 4,009 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#16 (of 120 teams · 317.7 yds/g allowed · 3,812 yards)#16 (of 120 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#43 (of 120 teams · +5.9 /g · +71 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 20 taken, 26 given · -0.50 /g)#73 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#81 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#46 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.948 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#91 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #19–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#94 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #12–#120. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#56 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #10–#113. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#60 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #14–#118. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#74 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #9–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#84 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #15–#112. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#69 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #10–#115. 1 of 13 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#100 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #31–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #3–#94. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #13–#118. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #13–#113. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#61 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #8–#120. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range #4–#110. 3 of 13 in the top 10.)
2010Akron1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 120 teams · 268.5 yds/g · 3,222 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 15.6 pts/g · 187 points)#99 (of 120 teams · 428.2 yds/g allowed · 5,138 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 421 points)#115 (of 120 teams · -19.5 /g · -234 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.50 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:38 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 120 teams · -0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#70 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.897 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Ball State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 120 teams · 305.8 yds/g · 3,670 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 264 points)#79 (of 120 teams · 398.3 yds/g allowed · 4,780 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#94 (of 120 teams · -8.4 /g · -101 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 26 taken, 31 given · -0.42 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 18:03 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 120 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 120 teams · 0.760 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Bowling Green2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 120 teams · 294.4 yds/g · 3,533 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 255 points)#102 (of 120 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 5,184 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 403 points)#105 (of 120 teams · -12.3 /g · -148 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 29 taken, 32 given · -0.25 /g)#61 (of 120 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 120 teams · -0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#113 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.805 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Buffalo2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 120 teams · 297.7 yds/g · 3,572 yards)#120 (of 120 teams · 14.2 pts/g · 170 points)#32 (of 120 teams · 340.5 yds/g allowed · 4,086 yards)#67 (of 120 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#108 (of 120 teams · -13.7 /g · -164 on the season)#103 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 25 taken, 33 given · -0.67 /g)#115 (of 120 teams · 16:41 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 120 teams · -0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.932 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.806 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Central Michigan390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 120 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 4,677 yards)#82 (of 120 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#66 (of 120 teams · 377.0 yds/g allowed · 4,524 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 312 points)#74 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -19 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 18 taken, 29 given · -0.92 /g)#47 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#73 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.973 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.839 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Eastern Michigan2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 120 teams · 333.4 yds/g · 4,001 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 228 points)#113 (of 120 teams · 454.1 yds/g allowed · 5,449 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 43.9 pts/g allowed · 527 points)#118 (of 120 teams · -24.9 /g · -299 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:11 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 120 teams · -0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#96 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.889 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kent State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 120 teams · 314.3 yds/g · 3,772 yards)#99 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 256 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 306.7 yds/g allowed · 3,680 yards)#42 (of 120 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#74 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -19 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 27 taken, 27 given · +0.00 /g)#69 (of 120 teams · 18:28 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 120 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#13 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Miami (OH)1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 120 teams · 352.0 yds/g · 4,928 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 302 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 338.2 yds/g allowed · 4,735 yards)#44 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#77 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -23 on the season)#17 (of 120 teams · +11 on the season · 35 taken, 24 given · +0.79 /g)#18 (of 120 teams · 19:47 /g · 4h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 120 teams · -0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 120 teams · 1.002 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Northern Illinois1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 120 teams · 450.0 yds/g · 6,300 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 38.0 pts/g · 532 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 334.7 yds/g allowed · 4,686 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.1 /g · +267 on the season)#17 (of 120 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.79 /g)#35 (of 120 teams · 19:15 /g · 4h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 120 teams · 0.992 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Ohio850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 120 teams · 325.8 yds/g · 4,235 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 357 points)#41 (of 120 teams · 353.4 yds/g allowed · 4,594 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#54 (of 120 teams · +3.7 /g · +48 on the season)#98 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 25 taken, 32 given · -0.54 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 18:23 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#44 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.868 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.932 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Toledo850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 120 teams · 365.4 yds/g · 4,750 yards)#54 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 363 points)#56 (of 120 teams · 364.8 yds/g allowed · 4,742 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#68 (of 120 teams · -0.6 /g · -8 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +11 on the season · 34 taken, 23 given · +0.85 /g)#32 (of 120 teams · 19:20 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 120 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#85 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.809 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Western Michigan660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 411.7 yds/g · 4,940 yards)#27 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 388 points)#73 (of 120 teams · 387.8 yds/g allowed · 4,654 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#34 (of 120 teams · +8.5 /g · +102 on the season)#43 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 30 taken, 27 given · +0.25 /g)#101 (of 120 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.923 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20102010 TempleMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #91
Total offense. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #19 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #34 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #50 of 120; 2010 Toledo #74 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #81 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #91 of 120; 2010 Ohio #95 of 120; 2010 Kent State #102 of 120; 2010 Ball State #106 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #111 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #115 of 120; 2010 Akron #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 89 of 120. Mid-American median rank 91.
Scoring offensemedian #94
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #12 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #27 of 120; 2010 Toledo #54 of 120; 2010 Ohio #55 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #82 of 120; 2010 Ball State #94 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #98 of 120; 2010 Kent State #99 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #100 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #108 of 120; 2010 Akron #118 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 79 of 120. Mid-American median rank 94.
Total defensemedian #56
Total defense. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Kent State #10 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #26 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #28 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #32 of 120; 2010 Ohio #41 of 120; 2010 Toledo #56 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #66 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #73 of 120; 2010 Ball State #79 of 120; 2010 Akron #99 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #102 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 16 of 120. Mid-American median rank 56.
Scoring defensemedian #60
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #14 of 120; 2010 Kent State #42 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #44 of 120; 2010 Ohio #51 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #52 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #60 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #67 of 120; 2010 Toledo #73 of 120; 2010 Ball State #88 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #100 of 120; 2010 Akron #106 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 16 of 120. Mid-American median rank 60.
Point marginmedian #74
Point margin. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #9 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #34 of 120; 2010 Ohio #54 of 120; 2010 Toledo #68 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #74 of 120; 2010 Kent State #74 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #77 of 120; 2010 Ball State #94 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #105 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #108 of 120; 2010 Akron #115 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 43 of 120. Mid-American median rank 74.
Turnover marginmedian #84
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Toledo #15 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #17 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #17 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #43 of 120; 2010 Kent State #55 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #70 of 120; 2010 Ball State #84 of 120; 2010 Akron #90 of 120; 2010 Ohio #98 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #103 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #112 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 90 of 120. Mid-American median rank 84.
Possessionmedian #69
Possession. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Eastern Michigan #10 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #18 of 120; 2010 Toledo #32 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #35 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #47 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #61 of 120; 2010 Kent State #69 of 120; 2010 Ohio #71 of 120; 2010 Ball State #80 of 120; 2010 Akron #94 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #101 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 73 of 120. Mid-American median rank 69.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #100
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #31 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #55 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #57 of 120; 2010 Ohio #76 of 120; 2010 Toledo #99 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #100 of 120; 2010 Kent State #104 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #114 of 120; 2010 Akron #115 of 120; 2010 Ball State #117 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #118 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 83 of 120. Mid-American median rank 100.
Defensive EPAmedian #39
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Buffalo #3 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #7 of 120; 2010 Kent State #18 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #28 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #31 of 120; 2010 Toledo #37 of 120; 2010 Ohio #42 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #52 of 120; 2010 Ball State #68 of 120; 2010 Akron #87 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #91 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #94 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 39 of 120. Mid-American median rank 39.
Offensive success ratemedian #85
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Northern Illinois #13 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #55 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #57 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #63 of 120; 2010 Ohio #79 of 120; 2010 Ball State #85 of 120; 2010 Kent State #98 of 120; 2010 Toledo #103 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #108 of 120; 2010 Akron #110 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #117 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 81 of 120. Mid-American median rank 85.
Defensive success ratemedian #46
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Kent State #13 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #14 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #16 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #28 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #35 of 120; 2010 Ohio #44 of 120; 2010 Akron #70 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #73 of 120; 2010 Toledo #85 of 120; 2010 Ball State #89 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #96 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 46 of 120. Mid-American median rank 46.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #61
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Eastern Michigan #8 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #20 of 120; 2010 Kent State #30 of 120; 2010 Toledo #39 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #51 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #61 of 120; 2010 Akron #79 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #88 of 120; 2010 Ohio #95 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #97 of 120; 2010 Bowling Green #99 of 120; 2010 Ball State #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 34 of 120. Mid-American median rank 61.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #41
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Bowling Green #4 of 120; 2010 Buffalo #5 of 120; 2010 Toledo #7 of 120; 2010 Central Michigan #12 of 120; 2010 Ball State #13 of 120; 2010 Eastern Michigan #41 of 120; 2010 Ohio #65 of 120; 2010 Akron #78 of 120; 2010 Kent State #82 of 120; 2010 Western Michigan #106 of 120; 2010 Northern Illinois #107 of 120; 2010 Miami (OH) #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Temple, ranked 38 of 120. Mid-American median rank 41.