THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Texas StateBobcats

Season
‹
›Current

Sun Belt

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Texas State played 1 such game.

Sun Belt, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Texas State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (105.0 yds/g · 105 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (467.0 yds/g allowed · 467 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42.0 pts/g allowed · 42 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-39.0 /g · -39 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20:31 /g · 0h 21m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 128 teams · 351.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.291 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.452 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.181 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.269 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 11 Sun Belt teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#68 (Returning passing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #1–#127. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#95 (Returning receiving: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #30–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning rushing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #13–#114. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#112 (Team talent: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #76–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2016Georgia Southern5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (368.0 yds/g · 736 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25.5 pts/g · 51 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (439.0 yds/g allowed · 878 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36.0 pts/g allowed · 72 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-10.5 /g · -21 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:49 /g · 1h 10m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 435.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.346 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.236 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Louisiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (465.0 yds/g · 465 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (400.0 yds/g allowed · 400 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35.0 pts/g allowed · 35 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-14.0 /g · -14 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 2 taken, 4 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:22 /g · 0h 31m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#83 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 421.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.518 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016South Alabama6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (379.0 yds/g · 379 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (382.0 yds/g allowed · 382 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g allowed · 20 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1.0 /g · +1 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 0 taken, 0 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36:41 /g · 0h 37m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#104 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 389.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.303 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.608 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Troy10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (386.0 yds/g · 386 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (414.0 yds/g allowed · 414 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30.0 pts/g allowed · 30 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6.0 /g · -6 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:20 /g · 0h 33m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#66 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 390.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.127 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.144 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016App State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (275.5 yds/g · 551 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (11.5 pts/g · 23 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (434.0 yds/g allowed · 868 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32.5 pts/g allowed · 65 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-21.0 /g · -42 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:57 /g · 1h 08m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 333.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.942 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.425 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Arkansas State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (326.0 yds/g · 326 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (706.0 yds/g allowed · 706 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (51.0 pts/g allowed · 51 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-37.0 /g · -37 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24:18 /g · 0h 24m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 471.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.423 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.474 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.314 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Idaho9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (289.5 yds/g · 579 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 20 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (495.5 yds/g allowed · 991 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57.5 pts/g allowed · 115 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-47.5 /g · -95 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 2 taken, 5 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:58 /g · 1h 04m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#63 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 256.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.410 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.033 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016New Mexico State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (408.0 yds/g · 816 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26.0 pts/g · 52 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (603.5 yds/g allowed · 1,207 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57.0 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-31.0 /g · -62 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:48 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#79 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 267.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.441 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.094 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016UL Monroe4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (300.5 yds/g · 601 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (12.0 pts/g · 24 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (664.0 yds/g allowed · 1,328 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (58.5 pts/g allowed · 117 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-46.5 /g · -93 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:01 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#68 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 322.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.488 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (62% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.357 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Georgia State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (302.0 yds/g · 302 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (400.0 yds/g allowed · 400 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.0 pts/g allowed · 23 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6.0 /g · -6 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 2 taken, 0 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22:32 /g · 0h 23m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 321.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.164 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.386 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.999 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20162016 Texas StateSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offense
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Total defense
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defense
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Point margin
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passingmedian #68
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Southern #1 of 128; 2016 App State #37 of 128; 2016 Idaho #63 of 128; 2016 Troy #66 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #68 of 128; 2016 New Mexico State #79 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #104 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #119 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Texas State, ranked 12 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 68.
Returning receivingmedian #95
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia State #30 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #39 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #41 of 128; 2016 Idaho #74 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #91 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #95 of 128; 2016 App State #99 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #107 of 128; 2016 Troy #109 of 128; 2016 New Mexico State #112 of 128. Marked: 2016 Texas State, ranked 128 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 95.
Returning rushingmedian #69
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Southern #13 of 128; 2016 App State #18 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #32 of 128; 2016 New Mexico State #45 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #61 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #69 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #99 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #107 of 128; 2016 Idaho #113 of 128; 2016 Troy #114 of 128. Marked: 2016 Texas State, ranked 105 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 69.
Team talentmedian #112
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas State #76 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #86 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #88 of 128; 2016 Troy #100 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #102 of 128; 2016 App State #119 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #121 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #122 of 128; 2016 New Mexico State #125 of 128; 2016 Idaho #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Texas State, ranked 112 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 112.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: . Marked: 2016 Texas State, which has no value for this metric.