THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

ToledoRockets

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Toledo played 2 such games.

Mid-American, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Toledo10–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple)— (313.5 yds/g · 627 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.0 pts/g · 46 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (498.0 yds/g allowed · 996 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.5 pts/g allowed · 35 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+5.5 /g · +11 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21:54 /g · 0h 44m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#46 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 429.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#1 — top 10 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #1–#31. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#7 — top 10 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #7–#64. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#19 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #19–#60. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #37–#67. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#37 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #37–#63. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#21 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #21–#65. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#3 — top 10 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #3–#32. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#15 (Returning passing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #1–#122. 5 of 13 in the top 10.)#46 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #2–#113. 3 of 13 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #1–#117. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#101 (Team talent: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #76–#118. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#6 — top 10 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #6–#39. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #63–#69. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#8 — top 10 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #8–#45. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #50–#67. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #35–#50. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#13 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range #13–#32. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)
2015Bowling Green10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 596.0 yds/g · 1,788 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 37.7 pts/g · 113 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 457.0 yds/g allowed · 1,371 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · -0.3 /g · -1 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +1 in these games · 5 taken, 4 given · +0.33 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 30:32 /g · 1h 32m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 433.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 47% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Buffalo5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (274.0 yds/g · 274 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (328.0 yds/g allowed · 328 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g allowed · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-13.0 /g · -13 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:26 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 316.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.104 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.391 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Western Michigan8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (360.5 yds/g · 721 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (18.0 pts/g · 36 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (481.5 yds/g allowed · 963 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37.5 pts/g allowed · 75 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-19.5 /g · -39 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:28 /g · 1h 09m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 442.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.290 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.453 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Akron8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (165.5 yds/g · 331 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (5.0 pts/g · 10 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (423.5 yds/g allowed · 847 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32.5 pts/g allowed · 65 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-27.5 /g · -55 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:40 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 412.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.079 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.087 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Ball State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (360.0 yds/g · 720 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 42 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (524.5 yds/g allowed · 1,049 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.0 pts/g allowed · 80 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-19.0 /g · -38 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:38 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#77 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 349.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.321 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.195 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Central Michigan7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 75 teams · 401.0 yds/g · 1,203 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 50 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 1,069 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -11.3 /g · -34 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:48 /g · 1h 44m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 376.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 75 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kent State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (193.5 yds/g · 387 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (5.0 pts/g · 10 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (315.0 yds/g allowed · 630 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-26.0 /g · -52 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:59 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 338.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.840 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.450 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Massachusetts3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (423.5 yds/g · 847 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.5 pts/g · 41 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (619.5 yds/g allowed · 1,239 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55.0 pts/g allowed · 110 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-34.5 /g · -69 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:54 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 323.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.478 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.577 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.191 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Eastern Michigan1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (255.0 yds/g · 255 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 22 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (471.0 yds/g allowed · 471 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44.0 pts/g allowed · 44 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-22.0 /g · -22 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:31 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 128 teams · 341.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.391 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.988 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.132 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Northern Illinois8–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (171.5 yds/g · 343 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.5 pts/g · 27 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (312.0 yds/g allowed · 624 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (18.5 pts/g allowed · 37 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-5.0 /g · -10 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 6 taken, 4 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:18 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#56 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 128 teams · 380.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.107 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Ohio8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (345.0 yds/g · 345 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (468.0 yds/g allowed · 468 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g allowed · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.0 /g · -3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:58 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 330.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.291 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Miami (OH)3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (157.0 yds/g · 157 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.0 pts/g · 0 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (451.0 yds/g allowed · 451 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (58.0 pts/g allowed · 58 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-58.0 /g · -58 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -3.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23:11 /g · 0h 23m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 397.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.417 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20152015 ToledoMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #1
Total offense. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #1 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #31 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 1.
Scoring offensemedian #7
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #7 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #64 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 7.
Total defensemedian #19
Total defense. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Central Michigan #19 of 75; 2015 Bowling Green #60 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 19.
Scoring defensemedian #37
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Central Michigan #37 of 75; 2015 Bowling Green #67 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 37.
Point marginmedian #37
Point margin. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #37 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #63 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 37.
Turnover marginmedian #21
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #21 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #65 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 21.
Possessionmedian #3
Possession. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Central Michigan #3 of 75; 2015 Bowling Green #32 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 3.
Returning passingmedian #15
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Buffalo #1 of 128; 2015 Western Michigan #1 of 128; 2015 Central Michigan #7 of 128; 2015 Kent State #7 of 128; 2015 Massachusetts #7 of 128; 2015 Akron #15 of 128; 2015 Ohio #15 of 128; 2015 Bowling Green #52 of 128; 2015 Northern Illinois #56 of 128; 2015 Eastern Michigan #71 of 128; 2015 Ball State #77 of 128; 2015 Miami (OH) #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 Toledo, ranked 46 of 128. Mid-American median rank 15.
Returning receivingmedian #46
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Michigan #2 of 128; 2015 Bowling Green #8 of 128; 2015 Ball State #9 of 128; 2015 Buffalo #26 of 128; 2015 Massachusetts #29 of 128; 2015 Ohio #46 of 128; 2015 Miami (OH) #69 of 128; 2015 Northern Illinois #76 of 128; 2015 Kent State #97 of 128; 2015 Akron #98 of 128; 2015 Central Michigan #106 of 128; 2015 Eastern Michigan #113 of 128. Marked: 2015 Toledo, ranked 15 of 128. Mid-American median rank 46.
Returning rushingmedian #44
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Buffalo #1 of 128; 2015 Akron #5 of 128; 2015 Ohio #18 of 128; 2015 Massachusetts #34 of 128; 2015 Western Michigan #35 of 128; 2015 Kent State #44 of 128; 2015 Bowling Green #77 of 128; 2015 Northern Illinois #82 of 128; 2015 Eastern Michigan #104 of 128; 2015 Central Michigan #113 of 128; 2015 Ball State #116 of 128; 2015 Miami (OH) #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 Toledo, ranked 22 of 128. Mid-American median rank 44.
Team talentmedian #101
Team talent. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Michigan #76 of 128; 2015 Bowling Green #78 of 128; 2015 Akron #81 of 128; 2015 Miami (OH) #92 of 128; 2015 Northern Illinois #97 of 128; 2015 Central Michigan #101 of 128; 2015 Ball State #107 of 128; 2015 Eastern Michigan #109 of 128; 2015 Kent State #110 of 128; 2015 Ohio #115 of 128; 2015 Massachusetts #116 of 128; 2015 Buffalo #118 of 128. Marked: 2015 Toledo, ranked 80 of 128. Mid-American median rank 101.
Offensive EPAmedian #6
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #6 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #39 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 6.
Defensive EPAmedian #63
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #63 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #69 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 63.
Offensive success ratemedian #8
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #8 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #45 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 8.
Defensive success ratemedian #50
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Central Michigan #50 of 75; 2015 Bowling Green #67 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 50.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #35
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #35 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #50 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 35.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #13
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Bowling Green #13 of 75; 2015 Central Michigan #32 of 75. Marked: 2015 Toledo, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 13.