THIRD AND DATA

Tulsa game log

2016: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 3vs San José State45–10 W835126.258–30513–25–207287–161–102–2531:5149%26%
Sep 10at #6 Ohio State3–48 L691882.737–6115–32–127144–160–165–4626:0731%44%
Sep 17vs North Carolina A&T58–21 W784936.339–13525–39–358285–130–026–6027:0849%27%
Sep 24at Fresno State48–41 W1026076.068–34424–34–281347–192–228–7127:0743%30%
Oct 7vs SMU43–40 W1035625.559–31525–44–247349–210–0117–14932:1945%37%
Oct 15at Houston31–38 L864595.335–9427–51–3652714–200–125–2524:5442%55%
Oct 22vs Tulane50–27 W815667.058–33014–23–236298–150–026–3632:2348%32%
Oct 29at Memphis59–30 W875966.954–36220–33–2342910–160–017–6333:2445%38%
Nov 5vs East Carolina45–24 W926166.754–34222–38–274376–140–0010–8631:5049%37%
Nov 12at Navy40–42 L655768.938–20716–27–369238–143–313–3522:3546%44%
Nov 19at UCF35–20 W814745.956–34812–25–126213–172–313–2632:4336%26%
Nov 25vs Cincinnati40–37 W1046115.965–30625–39–305356–140–133–3734:3650%41%
Dec 19vs Central Michigan55–10 W855816.846–26129–39–3203410–151–303–2529:0856%32%
Season13 games10–31,1166,8416.1667–3410267–449–3,44937397–2109–152178–6846:26:0546%36%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Tulsa on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Tulsa's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Tulsa offense 46% (507 of 1113)Opponent offense / Tulsa defense 36% (367 of 1011)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%San José State: opponent offense 26% of 61San José State: Tulsa offense 49% of 83#6 Ohio State: opponent offense 44% of 68#6 Ohio State: Tulsa offense 31% of 68North Carolina A&T: opponent offense 27% of 75North Carolina A&T: Tulsa offense 49% of 78Fresno State: opponent offense 30% of 89Fresno State: Tulsa offense 43% of 100SMU: opponent offense 37% of 87SMU: Tulsa offense 45% of 103Houston: opponent offense 55% of 89Houston: Tulsa offense 42% of 86Tulane: opponent offense 32% of 68Tulane: Tulsa offense 48% of 81Memphis: opponent offense 38% of 82Memphis: Tulsa offense 45% of 87East Carolina: opponent offense 37% of 92East Carolina: Tulsa offense 49% of 92Navy: opponent offense 44% of 72Navy: Tulsa offense 46% of 65UCF: opponent offense 26% of 85UCF: Tulsa offense 36% of 81Cincinnati: opponent offense 41% of 71Cincinnati: Tulsa offense 50% of 104Central Michigan: opponent offense 32% of 72Central Michigan: Tulsa offense 56% of 85
San José State@ #6 Ohio StateNorth Carolina A&T@ Fresno StateSMU@ HoustonTulane@ MemphisEast Carolina@ Navy@ UCFCincinnatiCentral Michigan *
Tulsa offenseOpponent offense (Tulsa defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs San José State

45–10 W · 83 plays to 61
Tulsa offense 49% (41/83)San José State offense 26% (16/61)

at #6 Ohio State

3–48 L · 68 plays to 68
Tulsa offense 31% (21/68)Ohio State offense 44% (30/68)

vs North Carolina A&T

58–21 W · 78 plays to 75
Tulsa offense 49% (38/78)N.C. A&T offense 27% (20/75)

at Fresno State

48–41 W · 100 plays to 89
Tulsa offense 43% (43/100)Fresno State offense 30% (27/89)

vs SMU

43–40 W · 103 plays to 87
Tulsa offense 45% (46/103)SMU offense 37% (32/87)

at Houston

31–38 L · 86 plays to 89
Tulsa offense 42% (36/86)Houston offense 55% (49/89)

vs Tulane

50–27 W · 81 plays to 68
Tulsa offense 48% (39/81)Tulane offense 32% (22/68)

at Memphis

59–30 W · 87 plays to 82
Tulsa offense 45% (39/87)Memphis offense 38% (31/82)

vs East Carolina

45–24 W · 92 plays to 92
Tulsa offense 49% (45/92)East Carolina offense 37% (34/92)

at Navy

40–42 L · 65 plays to 72
Tulsa offense 46% (30/65)Navy offense 44% (32/72)

at UCF

35–20 W · 81 plays to 85
Tulsa offense 36% (29/81)UCF offense 26% (22/85)

vs Cincinnati

40–37 W · 104 plays to 71
Tulsa offense 50% (52/104)Cincinnati offense 41% (29/71)

vs Central Michigan

55–10 W · 85 plays to 72
Tulsa offense 56% (48/85)Central Michigan offense 32% (23/72)