THIRD AND DATA

UAB game log

2019: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Alabama State24–19 W662904.446–1768–20–114161–130–128–7231:5132%31%
Sep 7at Akron31–20 W584026.934–8315–24–319154–140–114–3527:3724%30%
Sep 21vs South Alabama35–3 W735147.045–20122–28–313269–130–124–3340:0356%28%
Sep 28at Western Kentucky13–20 L702984.339–11718–31–181205–131–347–6732:4541%36%
Oct 5vs Rice35–20 W634096.537–12714–26–282185–132–3213–17430:5435%32%
Oct 12at UTSA33–14 W674927.341–19817–26–294262–111–226–6836:0643%29%
Oct 19vs Old Dominion38–14 W734356.044–17515–29–260216–130–026–6232:5240%32%
Nov 2at Tennessee7–30 L552374.325–6314–30–174126–140–045–4926:0529%35%
Nov 9at Southern Miss2–37 L581733.033–7015–25–103102–140–122–3032:0121%36%
Nov 16vs UTEP37–10 W594497.649–3535–10–96176–120–009–8330:1644%30%
Nov 23vs Louisiana Tech20–14 W673535.344–16612–23–187173–152–418–7032:5237%35%
Nov 30at North Texas26–21 W613105.148–2037–13–107203–100–0110–9031:0749%35%
Dec 7at Florida Atlantic6–49 L592233.840–1398–19–84142–130–1211–8331:0531%43%
Dec 21vs #19 App State17–31 L673385.033–4022–34–298203–142–338–7325:4139%28%
Season14 games9–58964,9235.5558–2111192–338–2,81225257–1828–2028101–9897:21:1538%33%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UAB on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UAB's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UAB offense 38% (337 of 892)Opponent offense / UAB defense 33% (294 of 892)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Alabama State: opponent offense 31% of 64Alabama State: UAB offense 32% of 66Akron: opponent offense 30% of 71Akron: UAB offense 24% of 54South Alabama: opponent offense 28% of 47South Alabama: UAB offense 56% of 73Western Kentucky: opponent offense 36% of 53Western Kentucky: UAB offense 41% of 70Rice: opponent offense 32% of 73Rice: UAB offense 35% of 63UTSA: opponent offense 29% of 56UTSA: UAB offense 43% of 67Old Dominion: opponent offense 32% of 57Old Dominion: UAB offense 40% of 73Tennessee: opponent offense 35% of 66Tennessee: UAB offense 29% of 55Southern Miss: opponent offense 36% of 56Southern Miss: UAB offense 21% of 58UTEP: opponent offense 30% of 69UTEP: UAB offense 44% of 59Louisiana Tech: opponent offense 35% of 65Louisiana Tech: UAB offense 37% of 67North Texas: opponent offense 35% of 69North Texas: UAB offense 49% of 61Florida Atlantic: opponent offense 43% of 81Florida Atlantic: UAB offense 31% of 59#19 App State: opponent offense 28% of 65#19 App State: UAB offense 39% of 67
Alabama State@ AkronSouth Alabama@ Western KentuckyRice@ UTSAOld Dominion@ Tennessee@ Southern MissUTEPLouisiana Tech@ North Texas@ Florida Atlantic#19 App State *
UAB offenseOpponent offense (UAB defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs Alabama State

24–19 W · 66 plays to 64
UAB offense 32% (21/66)Alabama State offense 31% (20/64)

at Akron

31–20 W · 54 plays to 71
UAB offense 24% (13/54)Akron offense 30% (21/71)

vs South Alabama

35–3 W · 73 plays to 47
UAB offense 56% (41/73)South Alabama offense 28% (13/47)

at Western Kentucky

13–20 L · 70 plays to 53
UAB offense 41% (29/70)Western Kentucky offense 36% (19/53)

vs Rice

35–20 W · 63 plays to 73
UAB offense 35% (22/63)Rice offense 32% (23/73)

at UTSA

33–14 W · 67 plays to 56
UAB offense 43% (29/67)UTSA offense 29% (16/56)

vs Old Dominion

38–14 W · 73 plays to 57
UAB offense 40% (29/73)Old Dominion offense 32% (18/57)

at Tennessee

7–30 L · 55 plays to 66
UAB offense 29% (16/55)Tennessee offense 35% (23/66)

at Southern Miss

2–37 L · 58 plays to 56
UAB offense 21% (12/58)Southern Miss offense 36% (20/56)

vs UTEP

37–10 W · 59 plays to 69
UAB offense 44% (26/59)UTEP offense 30% (21/69)

vs Louisiana Tech

20–14 W · 67 plays to 65
UAB offense 37% (25/67)Louisiana Tech offense 35% (23/65)

at North Texas

26–21 W · 61 plays to 69
UAB offense 49% (30/61)North Texas offense 35% (24/69)

at Florida Atlantic

6–49 L · 59 plays to 81
UAB offense 31% (18/59)Florida Atlantic offense 43% (35/81)

vs #19 App State

17–31 L · 67 plays to 65
UAB offense 39% (26/67)App State offense 28% (18/65)