Metrics

UCLABruins

Season

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2026

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026UCLA200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 138 teams · 413.0 yds/g · 826 yards)#45 (of 138 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 73 points)#57 (of 138 teams · 299.5 yds/g allowed · 599 yards)#50 (of 138 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points)#46 (of 138 teams · +19.5 /g · +39 on the season)#24 (of 138 teams · +2 on the season · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g)#78 (of 138 teams · 30:03 /g · 1h 00m on the season)#45 (of 138 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 138 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 138 teams · 774.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 138 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 138 teams · -0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 138 teams · 49% of plays successful)#28 (of 138 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 138 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 138 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#51 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #9–#131. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#133. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #4–#121. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#41 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#123. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#47 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#120. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#43 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #3–#136. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#54 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#129. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#123. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #5–#126. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#131. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #3–#61. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#126. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#129. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#128. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #4–#111. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#56 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #4–#129. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#66 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #17–#129. 0 of 18 in the top 10.)
2026Illinois110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 138 teams · 357.0 yds/g · 714 yards)#53 (of 138 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 69 points)#107 (of 138 teams · 394.5 yds/g allowed · 789 yards)#100 (of 138 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 54 points)#80 (of 138 teams · +7.5 /g · +15 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g)#124 (of 138 teams · 26:06 /g · 0h 52m on the season)#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 138 teams · 704.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 138 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#129 (of 138 teams · 0.250 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 138 teams · 52% of plays successful)#110 (of 138 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 138 teams · 1.203 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 138 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Indiana200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 138 teams · 435.0 yds/g · 870 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 53.5 pts/g · 107 points)#13 (of 138 teams · 212.0 yds/g allowed · 424 yards)#11 (of 138 teams · 8.0 pts/g allowed · 16 points)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +45.5 /g · +91 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g)#105 (of 138 teams · 28:07 /g · 0h 56m on the season)#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's rushing production returning)#38 (of 138 teams · 735.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.583 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 138 teams · -0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 138 teams · 54% of plays successful)#12 (of 138 teams · 28% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 1.572 average PPA on successful plays)#129 (of 138 teams · 1.519 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Iowa200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 138 teams · 395.5 yds/g · 791 yards)#85 (of 138 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 56 points)#7 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 187.5 yds/g allowed · 375 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 6.5 pts/g allowed · 13 points)#39 (of 138 teams · +21.5 /g · +43 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g)#47 (of 138 teams · 31:47 /g · 1h 04m on the season)#89 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning)#44 (of 138 teams · 722.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 138 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 138 teams · -0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 138 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 23% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 138 teams · 1.103 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 138 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Maryland200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 560.5 yds/g · 1,121 yards)#14 (of 138 teams · 50.0 pts/g · 100 points)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 154.0 yds/g allowed · 308 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 7.0 pts/g allowed · 14 points)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +43.0 /g · +86 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +4 on the season · 4 taken, 0 given · +2.00 /g)#38 (of 138 teams · 32:17 /g · 1h 05m on the season)#37 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#59 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#25 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 138 teams · 719.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 138 teams · 0.361 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · -0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 138 teams · 53% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 27% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 138 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 138 teams · 1.247 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Michigan203 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#131 (of 138 teams · 269.5 yds/g · 539 yards)#133 (of 138 teams · 15.0 pts/g · 30 points)#28 (of 138 teams · 255.0 yds/g allowed · 510 yards)#17 (of 138 teams · 11.0 pts/g allowed · 22 points)#89 (of 138 teams · +4.0 /g · +8 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g)#120 (of 138 teams · 26:35 /g · 0h 53m on the season)#24 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#49 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#29 (of 138 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 138 teams · 890.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 138 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 138 teams · -0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 138 teams · 35% of plays successful)#43 (of 138 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 138 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 138 teams · 1.013 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Michigan State200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 138 teams · 434.5 yds/g · 869 yards)#62 (of 138 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 65 points)#23 (of 138 teams · 246.0 yds/g allowed · 492 yards)#34 (of 138 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 27 points)#47 (of 138 teams · +19.0 /g · +38 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 37:19 /g · 1h 15m on the season)#65 (of 138 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#61 (of 138 teams · 685.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 138 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 138 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 138 teams · 46% of plays successful)#59 (of 138 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 138 teams · 1.134 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 138 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Minnesota110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 138 teams · 393.5 yds/g · 787 yards)#48 (of 138 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 72 points)#51 (of 138 teams · 294.5 yds/g allowed · 589 yards)#78 (of 138 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 45 points)#63 (of 138 teams · +13.5 /g · +27 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g)#30 (of 138 teams · 33:03 /g · 1h 06m on the season)#20 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning)#41 (of 138 teams · 728.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 138 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 138 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 138 teams · 49% of plays successful)#75 (of 138 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#127 (of 138 teams · 1.006 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 138 teams · 1.137 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Nebraska200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 138 teams · 534.5 yds/g · 1,069 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 52.5 pts/g · 105 points)#21 (of 138 teams · 236.0 yds/g allowed · 472 yards)#41 (of 138 teams · 14.0 pts/g allowed · 28 points)#16 (of 138 teams · +38.5 /g · +77 on the season)#24 (of 138 teams · +2 on the season · 3 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g)#54 (of 138 teams · 31:10 /g · 1h 02m on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's passing production returning)#23 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#22 (of 138 teams · 787.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.518 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 138 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 138 teams · 56% of plays successful)#39 (of 138 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 138 teams · 1.453 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 138 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Northwestern100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 138 teams · 497.0 yds/g · 497 yards)#55 (of 138 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 34 points)#121 (of 138 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 432 yards)#60 (of 138 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 18 points)#56 (of 138 teams · +16.0 /g · +16 on the season)#24 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g)#127 (of 138 teams · 25:52 /g · 0h 26m on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 89% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#60 (of 138 teams · 688.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.480 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 138 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 138 teams · 51% of plays successful)#100 (of 138 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 1.485 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 138 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Ohio State115 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 138 teams · 521.5 yds/g · 1,043 yards)#40 (of 138 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 79 points)#27 (of 138 teams · 250.5 yds/g allowed · 501 yards)#34 (of 138 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 27 points)#30 (of 138 teams · +26.0 /g · +52 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g)#76 (of 138 teams · 30:05 /g · 1h 00m on the season)#33 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 138 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 964.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 138 teams · 0.380 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 138 teams · -0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 138 teams · 48% of plays successful)#55 (of 138 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 138 teams · 1.407 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 138 teams · 1.098 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Oregon114 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 138 teams · 389.0 yds/g · 778 yards)#62 (of 138 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 65 points)#117 (of 138 teams · 414.0 yds/g allowed · 828 yards)#123 (of 138 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 66 points)#98 (of 138 teams · -0.5 /g · -1 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g)#129 (of 138 teams · 25:36 /g · 0h 51m on the season)#26 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#60 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 138 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 138 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 138 teams · 38% of plays successful)#81 (of 138 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 1.567 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 138 teams · 1.090 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Penn State201 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 138 teams · 451.5 yds/g · 903 yards)#48 (of 138 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 72 points)#14 (of 138 teams · 215.0 yds/g allowed · 430 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 4.5 pts/g allowed · 9 points)#23 (of 138 teams · +31.5 /g · +63 on the season)#15 (of 138 teams · +3 on the season · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g)#36 (of 138 teams · 32:31 /g · 1h 05m on the season)#123 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving production returning)#131 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 138 teams · 774.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 138 teams · 0.322 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 138 teams · -0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 138 teams · 48% of plays successful)#50 (of 138 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 138 teams · 1.246 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 138 teams · 1.037 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Purdue110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 138 teams · 489.0 yds/g · 978 yards)#38 (of 138 teams · 40.0 pts/g · 80 points)#83 (of 138 teams · 347.5 yds/g allowed · 695 yards)#111 (of 138 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 57 points)#69 (of 138 teams · +11.5 /g · +23 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 1 taken, 0 given · +0.50 /g)#15 (of 138 teams · 34:47 /g · 1h 10m on the season)#53 (of 138 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#105 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#81 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 138 teams · 698.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 138 teams · 0.311 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 138 teams · 0.214 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 138 teams · 50% of plays successful)#98 (of 138 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 138 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays)#128 (of 138 teams · 1.511 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Rutgers020 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 138 teams · 366.5 yds/g · 733 yards)#111 (of 138 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 42 points)#110 (of 138 teams · 399.5 yds/g allowed · 799 yards)#122 (of 138 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 65 points)#120 (of 138 teams · -11.5 /g · -23 on the season)#136 (of 138 teams · -5 on the season · 3 taken, 8 given · -2.50 /g)#94 (of 138 teams · 29:06 /g · 0h 58m on the season)#94 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 138 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 138 teams · 709.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 138 teams · -0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 138 teams · 0.156 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 138 teams · 40% of plays successful)#111 (of 138 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 138 teams · 1.470 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 138 teams · 1.120 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026USC302 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 138 teams · 513.3 yds/g · 1,540 yards)#29 (of 138 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 130 points)#42 (of 138 teams · 270.0 yds/g allowed · 810 yards)#62 (of 138 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 56 points)#34 (of 138 teams · +24.7 /g · +74 on the season)#108 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 2 taken, 4 given · -0.67 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 36:27 /g · 1h 49m on the season)#36 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 138 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 899.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 138 teams · 0.305 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 138 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 57% of plays successful)#58 (of 138 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 138 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 138 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Washington200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#87 (of 138 teams · 379.0 yds/g · 758 yards)#116 (of 138 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 40 points)#30 (of 138 teams · 256.5 yds/g allowed · 513 yards)#22 (of 138 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points)#78 (of 138 teams · +8.0 /g · +16 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +6 on the season · 6 taken, 0 given · +3.00 /g)#41 (of 138 teams · 32:11 /g · 1h 04m on the season)#38 (of 138 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#66 (of 138 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 138 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#24 (of 138 teams · 777.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 138 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 138 teams · -0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 138 teams · 44% of plays successful)#26 (of 138 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 138 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 138 teams · 1.346 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Wisconsin110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#105 (of 138 teams · 345.0 yds/g · 690 yards)#96 (of 138 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 49 points)#70 (of 138 teams · 326.0 yds/g allowed · 652 yards)#90 (of 138 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 50 points)#98 (of 138 teams · -0.5 /g · -1 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 0 taken, 2 given · -1.00 /g)#117 (of 138 teams · 26:44 /g · 0h 53m on the season)#64 (of 138 teams · 52% of last season's passing production returning)#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#40 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's rushing production returning)#30 (of 138 teams · 767.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 138 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 138 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 138 teams · 38% of plays successful)#96 (of 138 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 138 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 138 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20262026 UCLABig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #51
Total offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Maryland #9 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #14 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #18 of 138; 2026 USC #23 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #26 of 138; 2026 Purdue #28 of 138; 2026 Penn State #38 of 138; 2026 Indiana #50 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #51 of 138; 2026 Iowa #76 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #78 of 138; 2026 Oregon #81 of 138; 2026 Washington #87 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #96 of 138; 2026 Illinois #101 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #105 of 138; 2026 Michigan #131 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 68 of 138. Big Ten median rank 51.
Scoring offensemedian #48
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #8 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #10 of 138; 2026 Maryland #14 of 138; 2026 USC #29 of 138; 2026 Purdue #38 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #40 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #48 of 138; 2026 Penn State #48 of 138; 2026 Illinois #53 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #55 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #62 of 138; 2026 Oregon #62 of 138; 2026 Iowa #85 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #96 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #111 of 138; 2026 Washington #116 of 138; 2026 Michigan #133 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 45 of 138. Big Ten median rank 48.
Total defensemedian #30
Total defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Maryland #4 of 138; 2026 Iowa #7 of 138; 2026 Indiana #13 of 138; 2026 Penn State #14 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #21 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #23 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #27 of 138; 2026 Michigan #28 of 138; 2026 Washington #30 of 138; 2026 USC #42 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #51 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #70 of 138; 2026 Purdue #83 of 138; 2026 Illinois #107 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #110 of 138; 2026 Oregon #117 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #121 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 57 of 138. Big Ten median rank 30.
Scoring defensemedian #41
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Penn State #1 of 138; 2026 Iowa #5 of 138; 2026 Maryland #9 of 138; 2026 Indiana #11 of 138; 2026 Michigan #17 of 138; 2026 Washington #22 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #34 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #34 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #41 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #60 of 138; 2026 USC #62 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #78 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #90 of 138; 2026 Illinois #100 of 138; 2026 Purdue #111 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #122 of 138; 2026 Oregon #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 50 of 138. Big Ten median rank 41.
Point marginmedian #47
Point margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #8 of 138; 2026 Maryland #10 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #16 of 138; 2026 Penn State #23 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #30 of 138; 2026 USC #34 of 138; 2026 Iowa #39 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #47 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #56 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #63 of 138; 2026 Purdue #69 of 138; 2026 Washington #78 of 138; 2026 Illinois #80 of 138; 2026 Michigan #89 of 138; 2026 Oregon #98 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #98 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #120 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 46 of 138. Big Ten median rank 47.
Turnover marginmedian #43
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Washington #3 of 138; 2026 Maryland #10 of 138; 2026 Penn State #15 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #24 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #24 of 138; 2026 Indiana #43 of 138; 2026 Iowa #43 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #43 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #43 of 138; 2026 Purdue #43 of 138; 2026 Illinois #69 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #69 of 138; 2026 Oregon #69 of 138; 2026 Michigan #91 of 138; 2026 USC #108 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #110 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 24 of 138. Big Ten median rank 43.
Possessionmedian #54
Possession. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Michigan State #2 of 138; 2026 USC #7 of 138; 2026 Purdue #15 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #30 of 138; 2026 Penn State #36 of 138; 2026 Maryland #38 of 138; 2026 Washington #41 of 138; 2026 Iowa #47 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #54 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #76 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 Indiana #105 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #117 of 138; 2026 Michigan #120 of 138; 2026 Illinois #124 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #127 of 138; 2026 Oregon #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 78 of 138. Big Ten median rank 54.
Returning passingmedian #45
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #20 of 138; 2026 Michigan #24 of 138; 2026 Oregon #26 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #33 of 138; 2026 USC #36 of 138; 2026 Maryland #37 of 138; 2026 Washington #38 of 138; 2026 Purdue #53 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #65 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #69 of 138; 2026 Iowa #89 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 Illinois #111 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 45 of 138. Big Ten median rank 45.
Returning receivingmedian #59
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #5 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #23 of 138; 2026 Oregon #30 of 138; 2026 Iowa #39 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 138; 2026 Illinois #48 of 138; 2026 Michigan #49 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #54 of 138; 2026 Maryland #59 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #61 of 138; 2026 Washington #66 of 138; 2026 USC #101 of 138; 2026 Purdue #105 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #106 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #112 of 138; 2026 Indiana #116 of 138; 2026 Penn State #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 96 of 138. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Illinois #17 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #20 of 138; 2026 USC #24 of 138; 2026 Maryland #25 of 138; 2026 Michigan #29 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #31 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #40 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #45 of 138; 2026 Iowa #46 of 138; 2026 Oregon #60 of 138; 2026 Washington #77 of 138; 2026 Purdue #81 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #90 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #96 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #131 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 28 of 138. Big Ten median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #30
Team talent. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oregon #3 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #5 of 138; 2026 USC #9 of 138; 2026 Michigan #11 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 138; 2026 Washington #24 of 138; 2026 Penn State #26 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #30 of 138; 2026 Indiana #38 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #41 of 138; 2026 Iowa #44 of 138; 2026 Maryland #46 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #48 of 138; 2026 Illinois #51 of 138; 2026 Purdue #55 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #60 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #61 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 25 of 138. Big Ten median rank 30.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #2 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #5 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #9 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #22 of 138; 2026 Maryland #25 of 138; 2026 Penn State #30 of 138; 2026 Purdue #34 of 138; 2026 USC #35 of 138; 2026 Illinois #55 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #75 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #83 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #91 of 138; 2026 Michigan #97 of 138; 2026 Oregon #106 of 138; 2026 Washington #108 of 138; 2026 Iowa #115 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 48 of 138. Big Ten median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #63
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Maryland #8 of 138; 2026 Washington #11 of 138; 2026 Iowa #14 of 138; 2026 Indiana #21 of 138; 2026 Penn State #22 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #31 of 138; 2026 Michigan #37 of 138; 2026 Oregon #63 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #78 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #83 of 138; 2026 USC #91 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #95 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #102 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #110 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #114 of 138; 2026 Purdue #124 of 138; 2026 Illinois #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 25 of 138. Big Ten median rank 63.
Offensive success ratemedian #45
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 USC #8 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #11 of 138; 2026 Indiana #21 of 138; 2026 Maryland #22 of 138; 2026 Illinois #29 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #34 of 138; 2026 Purdue #38 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #44 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #49 of 138; 2026 Penn State #52 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #63 of 138; 2026 Washington #72 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 Iowa #95 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #106 of 138; 2026 Oregon #107 of 138; 2026 Michigan #128 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 45 of 138. Big Ten median rank 45.
Defensive success ratemedian #55
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Iowa #4 of 138; 2026 Maryland #8 of 138; 2026 Indiana #12 of 138; 2026 Washington #26 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #39 of 138; 2026 Michigan #43 of 138; 2026 Penn State #50 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #55 of 138; 2026 USC #58 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #59 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #75 of 138; 2026 Oregon #81 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #96 of 138; 2026 Purdue #98 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #100 of 138; 2026 Illinois #110 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #111 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 28 of 138. Big Ten median rank 55.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #56
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #4 of 138; 2026 Oregon #5 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #10 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #11 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #14 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #22 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #25 of 138; 2026 Michigan #44 of 138; 2026 Maryland #56 of 138; 2026 Penn State #61 of 138; 2026 Illinois #77 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #98 of 138; 2026 Purdue #101 of 138; 2026 Iowa #109 of 138; 2026 USC #112 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #127 of 138; 2026 Washington #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 85 of 138. Big Ten median rank 56.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #66
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wisconsin #17 of 138; 2026 Michigan #19 of 138; 2026 Penn State #23 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #25 of 138; 2026 Oregon #32 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #34 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #42 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #47 of 138; 2026 Iowa #66 of 138; 2026 Maryland #79 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #85 of 138; 2026 Illinois #93 of 138; 2026 USC #102 of 138; 2026 Washington #109 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #112 of 138; 2026 Purdue #128 of 138; 2026 Indiana #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 UCLA, ranked 70 of 138. Big Ten median rank 66.