THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

UConnHuskies

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

FBS Independents, 2003

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2003UConn9–30 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#17 (of 117 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 408 points)— (— allowed · —)#56 (of 117 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#31 (of 117 teams · +9.0 /g · +108 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 4 FBS Independents teams in 20030 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)#30 (Scoring offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range #17–#112. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#43 (Scoring defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range #34–#65. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range #31–#89. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2003Navy8–50 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#30 (of 117 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)— (— allowed · —)#34 (of 117 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#33 (of 117 teams · +8.7 /g · +113 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Notre Dame5–70 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#93 (of 117 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 243 points)— (— allowed · —)#65 (of 117 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#83 (of 117 teams · -6.0 /g · -72 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Troy6–60 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#112 — bottom 10 (of 117 teams · 15.4 pts/g · 185 points)— (— allowed · —)#43 (of 117 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points)#89 (of 117 teams · -7.3 /g · -87 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20032003 UConnFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #30
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Navy #30 of 117; 2003 Notre Dame #93 of 117; 2003 Troy #112 of 117. Marked: 2003 UConn, ranked 17 of 117. FBS Independents median rank 30.
Total defense
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #43
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Navy #34 of 117; 2003 Troy #43 of 117; 2003 Notre Dame #65 of 117. Marked: 2003 UConn, ranked 56 of 117. FBS Independents median rank 43.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Navy #33 of 117; 2003 Notre Dame #83 of 117; 2003 Troy #89 of 117. Marked: 2003 UConn, ranked 31 of 117. FBS Independents median rank 33.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 UConn, which has no value for this metric.