Metrics

UConnHuskies

Season
Current

Big East

Big East, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011UConn570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 120 teams · 313.2 yds/g · 3,758 yards)#82 (of 120 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 291 points)#52 (of 120 teams · 368.9 yds/g allowed · 4,427 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#69 (of 120 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 on the season)#25 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 30 taken, 23 given · +0.58 /g)#44 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 120 teams · -0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#11 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 120 teams · 1.082 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Big East teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#85 (Total offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #13–#108. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#65 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #13–#98. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#35 (Total defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #16–#66. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #8–#73. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#37 (Point margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #16–#84. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#40 (Turnover margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #15–#53. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#81 (Possession: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #14–#97. 0 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#66 (Offensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #13–#108. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #9–#70. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#65 (Offensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #17–#112. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #11–#64. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #14–#113. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range #23–#116. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)
2011Cincinnati1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 385.7 yds/g · 5,014 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 433 points)#43 (of 120 teams · 357.4 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.0 /g · +169 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 30 taken, 21 given · +0.69 /g)#97 (of 120 teams · 17:21 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#37 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.970 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.986 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Louisville760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 120 teams · 333.0 yds/g · 4,329 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 285 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 329.5 yds/g allowed · 4,284 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points)#64 (of 120 teams · +1.9 /g · +24 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#18 (of 120 teams · 19:52 /g · 4h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 120 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#44 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Pittsburgh670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 120 teams · 350.1 yds/g · 4,551 yards)#83 (of 120 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 315 points)#35 (of 120 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 4,558 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#65 (of 120 teams · +1.4 /g · +18 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#91 (of 120 teams · 17:35 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#61 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.870 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Rutgers940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 120 teams · 339.0 yds/g · 4,407 yards)#65 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 343 points)#16 (of 120 teams · 311.5 yds/g allowed · 4,049 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 238 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +8.1 /g · +105 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 32 taken, 28 given · +0.31 /g)#14 (of 120 teams · 20:03 /g · 4h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 120 teams · -0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#12 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 1.001 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011South Florida570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 432.8 yds/g · 5,193 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 351 points)#39 (of 120 teams · 351.3 yds/g allowed · 4,216 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points)#37 (of 120 teams · +6.6 /g · +79 on the season)#40 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 26 taken, 24 given · +0.17 /g)#81 (of 120 teams · 17:55 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#40 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.840 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Syracuse570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 120 teams · 348.2 yds/g · 4,178 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#66 (of 120 teams · 386.4 yds/g allowed · 4,637 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 342 points)#84 (of 120 teams · -4.3 /g · -52 on the season)#40 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.17 /g)#90 (of 120 teams · 17:36 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.839 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.877 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011West Virginia1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 120 teams · 469.5 yds/g · 6,104 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#34 (of 120 teams · 349.1 yds/g allowed · 4,539 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 348 points)#23 (of 120 teams · +10.8 /g · +141 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#84 (of 120 teams · 17:43 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 120 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.887 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big East, 20112011 UConnBig East medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #85
Total offense. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 West Virginia #13 of 120; 2011 South Florida #29 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #58 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #85 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #88 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #97 of 120; 2011 Louisville #102 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 108 of 120. Big East median rank 85.
Scoring offensemedian #65
Scoring offense. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 West Virginia #13 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #26 of 120; 2011 South Florida #48 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #65 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #83 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #84 of 120; 2011 Louisville #98 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 82 of 120. Big East median rank 65.
Total defensemedian #35
Total defense. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #16 of 120; 2011 Louisville #26 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #34 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #35 of 120; 2011 South Florida #39 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #43 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #66 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 52 of 120. Big East median rank 35.
Scoring defensemedian #37
Scoring defense. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #8 of 120; 2011 Louisville #17 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #20 of 120; 2011 South Florida #37 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #38 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #61 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #73 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 50 of 120. Big East median rank 37.
Point marginmedian #37
Point margin. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Cincinnati #16 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #23 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #32 of 120; 2011 South Florida #37 of 120; 2011 Louisville #64 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #65 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #84 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 69 of 120. Big East median rank 37.
Turnover marginmedian #40
Turnover margin. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Cincinnati #15 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #32 of 120; 2011 South Florida #40 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #40 of 120; 2011 Louisville #47 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #47 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #53 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 25 of 120. Big East median rank 40.
Possessionmedian #81
Possession. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #14 of 120; 2011 Louisville #18 of 120; 2011 South Florida #81 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #84 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #90 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #91 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #97 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 44 of 120. Big East median rank 81.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big East, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big East, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big East, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big East, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 UConn, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #66
Offensive EPA. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 West Virginia #13 of 120; 2011 South Florida #47 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #63 of 120; 2011 Louisville #66 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #74 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #75 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 108 of 120. Big East median rank 66.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #9 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #17 of 120; 2011 Louisville #25 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #46 of 120; 2011 South Florida #49 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #68 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #70 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 34 of 120. Big East median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #65
Offensive success rate. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 South Florida #17 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #30 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #63 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #65 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #67 of 120; 2011 Louisville #80 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #108 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 112 of 120. Big East median rank 65.
Defensive success ratemedian #37
Defensive success rate. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #12 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #26 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #37 of 120; 2011 South Florida #40 of 120; 2011 Louisville #44 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #61 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #64 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 11 of 120. Big East median rank 37.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #33
Offensive explosiveness. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Rutgers #14 of 120; 2011 Louisville #21 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #32 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #33 of 120; 2011 Pittsburgh #52 of 120; 2011 South Florida #112 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #113 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 60 of 120. Big East median rank 33.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. Big East, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Pittsburgh #23 of 120; 2011 Syracuse #29 of 120; 2011 Louisville #33 of 120; 2011 West Virginia #35 of 120; 2011 South Florida #81 of 120; 2011 Cincinnati #97 of 120; 2011 Rutgers #100 of 120. Marked: 2011 UConn, ranked 116 of 120. Big East median rank 35.