Metrics

UConnHuskies

Season
Current

American Athletic

American Athletic, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016UConn390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#122 (of 128 teams · 320.0 yds/g · 3,840 yards)#128 (of 128 teams · 14.8 pts/g · 178 points)#66 (of 128 teams · 410.8 yds/g allowed · 4,929 yards)#65 (of 128 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#117 (of 128 teams · -13.3 /g · -159 on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · -8 on the season · 11 taken, 19 given · -0.67 /g)#63 (of 128 teams · 29:52 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#87 (of 128 teams · 423.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 128 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 128 teams · 0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#78 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 128 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 128 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #4–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #4–#128. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Total defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #4–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Scoring defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #11–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Point margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #13–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Turnover margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #13–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Possession: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #8–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #22–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #10–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #11–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #52–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #3–#123. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #5–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #3–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #8–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #1–#101. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #5–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2016Cincinnati480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#99 (of 128 teams · 374.1 yds/g · 4,489 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 232 points)#72 (of 128 teams · 422.8 yds/g allowed · 5,074 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#101 (of 128 teams · -7.6 /g · -91 on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#120 (of 128 teams · 26:30 /g · 5h 18m on the season)#40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's receiving production returning)#66 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 541.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 128 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#76 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016East Carolina390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 128 teams · 467.1 yds/g · 5,605 yards)#75 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 324 points)#100 (of 128 teams · 452.8 yds/g allowed · 5,433 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 433 points)#108 (of 128 teams · -9.1 /g · -109 on the season)#126 (of 128 teams · -16 on the season · 8 taken, 24 given · -1.33 /g)#60 (of 128 teams · 30:08 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#91 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's passing production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 442.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 128 teams · 0.167 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 128 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#102 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 128 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Houston940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Oklahoma, #13 Louisville)#41 (of 128 teams · 443.4 yds/g · 5,764 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 466 points)#13 (of 128 teams · 319.6 yds/g allowed · 4,155 yards)#30 (of 128 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#17 (of 128 teams · +12.4 /g · +161 on the season)#107 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 18 taken, 25 given · -0.54 /g)#13 (of 128 teams · 33:04 /g · 7h 10m on the season)#43 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 572.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 128 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 128 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#11 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 128 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 128 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Memphis850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Temple)#28 (of 128 teams · 463.7 yds/g · 6,028 yards)#15 (of 128 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 505 points)#106 (of 128 teams · 454.6 yds/g allowed · 5,910 yards)#68 (of 128 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#32 (of 128 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#19 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 29 taken, 21 given · +0.62 /g)#109 (of 128 teams · 27:13 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#125 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#87 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's rushing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 451.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.225 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#82 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 128 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 128 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Navy950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 128 teams · 438.3 yds/g · 6,136 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 531 points)#84 (of 128 teams · 434.0 yds/g allowed · 6,076 yards)#84 (of 128 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 434 points)#43 (of 128 teams · +6.9 /g · +97 on the season)#52 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.14 /g)#38 (of 128 teams · 31:11 /g · 7h 17m on the season)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's rushing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 342.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.340 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 128 teams · 0.268 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 52% of plays successful)#113 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 128 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016SMU570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 128 teams · 427.3 yds/g · 5,127 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 332 points)#103 (of 128 teams · 453.0 yds/g allowed · 5,436 yards)#111 (of 128 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 435 points)#104 (of 128 teams · -8.6 /g · -103 on the season)#47 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 26 taken, 24 given · +0.17 /g)#53 (of 128 teams · 30:38 /g · 6h 08m on the season)#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning)#75 (of 128 teams · 474.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 128 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#81 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016South Florida1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)#11 (of 128 teams · 511.5 yds/g · 6,650 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.8 pts/g · 569 points)#119 (of 128 teams · 482.0 yds/g allowed · 6,266 yards)#92 (of 128 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#20 (of 128 teams · +12.2 /g · +158 on the season)#14 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 26 taken, 17 given · +0.69 /g)#114 (of 128 teams · 26:49 /g · 5h 49m on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 128 teams · 0.198 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#114 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 128 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Temple1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)#65 (of 128 teams · 413.6 yds/g · 5,790 yards)#43 (of 128 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 453 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 282.5 yds/g allowed · 3,955 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 258 points)#13 (of 128 teams · +13.9 /g · +195 on the season)#32 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 25 taken, 19 given · +0.43 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:33 /g · 7h 50m on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 492.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#14 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 128 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 128 teams · 1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Tulane480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#118 (of 128 teams · 341.4 yds/g · 4,097 yards)#104 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 289 points)#32 (of 128 teams · 364.5 yds/g allowed · 4,374 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 332 points)#84 (of 128 teams · -3.6 /g · -43 on the season)#13 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.75 /g)#22 (of 128 teams · 32:24 /g · 6h 29m on the season)#124 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#56 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 388.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 128 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#35 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 128 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Tulsa1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 526.2 yds/g · 6,841 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.5 pts/g · 552 points)#74 (of 128 teams · 426.5 yds/g allowed · 5,544 yards)#76 (of 128 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 388 points)#15 (of 128 teams · +12.6 /g · +164 on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 21 taken, 21 given · +0.00 /g)#66 (of 128 teams · 29:42 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#91 (of 128 teams · 409.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#20 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 128 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016UCF670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#113 (of 128 teams · 351.1 yds/g · 4,565 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 374 points)#39 (of 128 teams · 370.3 yds/g allowed · 4,814 yards)#42 (of 128 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points)#53 (of 128 teams · +4.2 /g · +54 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 26 taken, 25 given · +0.08 /g)#107 (of 128 teams · 27:28 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#76 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 510.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 128 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#121 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20162016 UConnAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Tulsa #4 of 128; 2016 South Florida #11 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #23 of 128; 2016 Memphis #28 of 128; 2016 Houston #41 of 128; 2016 Navy #46 of 128; 2016 SMU #55 of 128; 2016 Temple #65 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #99 of 128; 2016 UCF #113 of 128; 2016 Tulane #118 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 122 of 128. American Athletic median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #4 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #7 of 128; 2016 Memphis #15 of 128; 2016 Navy #20 of 128; 2016 Houston #26 of 128; 2016 Temple #43 of 128; 2016 UCF #66 of 128; 2016 SMU #71 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #75 of 128; 2016 Tulane #104 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 128 of 128. American Athletic median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #72
Total defense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Temple #4 of 128; 2016 Houston #13 of 128; 2016 Tulane #32 of 128; 2016 UCF #39 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #72 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #74 of 128; 2016 Navy #84 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #100 of 128; 2016 SMU #103 of 128; 2016 Memphis #106 of 128; 2016 South Florida #119 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 66 of 128. American Athletic median rank 72.
Scoring defensemedian #65
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Temple #11 of 128; 2016 Houston #30 of 128; 2016 UCF #42 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #55 of 128; 2016 Tulane #60 of 128; 2016 Memphis #68 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #76 of 128; 2016 Navy #84 of 128; 2016 South Florida #92 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #110 of 128; 2016 SMU #111 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 65 of 128. American Athletic median rank 65.
Point marginmedian #43
Point margin. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Temple #13 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #15 of 128; 2016 Houston #17 of 128; 2016 South Florida #20 of 128; 2016 Memphis #32 of 128; 2016 Navy #43 of 128; 2016 UCF #53 of 128; 2016 Tulane #84 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #101 of 128; 2016 SMU #104 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #108 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 117 of 128. American Athletic median rank 43.
Turnover marginmedian #52
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Tulane #13 of 128; 2016 South Florida #14 of 128; 2016 Memphis #19 of 128; 2016 Temple #32 of 128; 2016 SMU #47 of 128; 2016 Navy #52 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #54 of 128; 2016 UCF #58 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #67 of 128; 2016 Houston #107 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 114 of 128. American Athletic median rank 52.
Possessionmedian #60
Possession. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Temple #8 of 128; 2016 Houston #13 of 128; 2016 Tulane #22 of 128; 2016 Navy #38 of 128; 2016 SMU #53 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #66 of 128; 2016 UCF #107 of 128; 2016 Memphis #109 of 128; 2016 South Florida #114 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #120 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 63 of 128. American Athletic median rank 60.
Returning passingmedian #49
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 SMU #22 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #25 of 128; 2016 Temple #34 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #40 of 128; 2016 Houston #43 of 128; 2016 South Florida #49 of 128; 2016 UCF #76 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #91 of 128; 2016 Navy #115 of 128; 2016 Tulane #124 of 128; 2016 Memphis #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 60 of 128. American Athletic median rank 49.
Returning receivingmedian #62
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #10 of 128; 2016 UCF #14 of 128; 2016 SMU #26 of 128; 2016 Navy #55 of 128; 2016 Tulane #62 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #67 of 128; 2016 Houston #82 of 128; 2016 Memphis #87 of 128; 2016 Temple #104 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #118 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 12 of 128. American Athletic median rank 62.
Returning rushingmedian #56
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #11 of 128; 2016 Temple #13 of 128; 2016 UCF #21 of 128; 2016 SMU #38 of 128; 2016 Tulane #56 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #66 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #83 of 128; 2016 Memphis #100 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #104 of 128; 2016 Houston #111 of 128; 2016 Navy #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 22 of 128. American Athletic median rank 56.
Team talentmedian #75
Team talent. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Houston #52 of 128; 2016 South Florida #54 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #58 of 128; 2016 UCF #69 of 128; 2016 Temple #71 of 128; 2016 SMU #75 of 128; 2016 Memphis #79 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #82 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #91 of 128; 2016 Tulane #103 of 128; 2016 Navy #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 87 of 128. American Athletic median rank 75.
Offensive EPAmedian #61
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #3 of 128; 2016 Navy #6 of 128; 2016 Memphis #26 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #31 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Temple #61 of 128; 2016 Houston #68 of 128; 2016 SMU #90 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #116 of 128; 2016 UCF #118 of 128; 2016 Tulane #120 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 123 of 128. American Athletic median rank 61.
Defensive EPAmedian #42
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCF #5 of 128; 2016 Houston #15 of 128; 2016 Temple #16 of 128; 2016 Tulane #31 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #33 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #42 of 128; 2016 SMU #66 of 128; 2016 Memphis #77 of 128; 2016 South Florida #91 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #112 of 128; 2016 Navy #118 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 83 of 128. American Athletic median rank 42.
Offensive success ratemedian #65
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Navy #3 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #24 of 128; 2016 South Florida #31 of 128; 2016 Memphis #38 of 128; 2016 Houston #61 of 128; 2016 Temple #65 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #66 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #104 of 128; 2016 SMU #109 of 128; 2016 Tulane #119 of 128; 2016 UCF #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 118 of 128. American Athletic median rank 65.
Defensive success ratemedian #76
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCF #8 of 128; 2016 Houston #11 of 128; 2016 Temple #14 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #20 of 128; 2016 Tulane #35 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #76 of 128; 2016 SMU #81 of 128; 2016 Memphis #82 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #102 of 128; 2016 Navy #113 of 128; 2016 South Florida #114 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 78 of 128. American Athletic median rank 76.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #65
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #1 of 128; 2016 Memphis #16 of 128; 2016 Temple #47 of 128; 2016 UCF #54 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Houston #65 of 128; 2016 SMU #66 of 128; 2016 Navy #78 of 128; 2016 Tulane #82 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #87 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #98 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 101 of 128. American Athletic median rank 65.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Cincinnati #5 of 128; 2016 South Florida #20 of 128; 2016 Memphis #47 of 128; 2016 Temple #59 of 128; 2016 UCF #67 of 128; 2016 SMU #73 of 128; 2016 Tulane #88 of 128; 2016 East Carolina #91 of 128; 2016 Navy #93 of 128; 2016 Houston #102 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #115 of 128. Marked: 2016 UConn, ranked 55 of 128. American Athletic median rank 67.