Metrics

USCTrojans

Season
Current

Pac-10

Pac-10, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010USC855 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 120 teams · 431.5 yds/g · 5,609 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#84 (of 120 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 5,203 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#51 (of 120 teams · +4.3 /g · +56 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#11 (of 120 teams · 20:07 /g · 4h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#100 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#29 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#100. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#53 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#106. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#57 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #18–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #10–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #7–#112. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#116. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#49 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #9–#94. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #5–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #7–#95. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #19–#114. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #26–#97. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2010Arizona760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 439.4 yds/g · 5,712 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#33 (of 120 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 4,431 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#45 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +72 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#75 (of 120 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Arizona State660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 425.7 yds/g · 5,108 yards)#28 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 387 points)#57 (of 120 teams · 365.5 yds/g allowed · 4,386 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +7.3 /g · +87 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.42 /g)#116 (of 120 teams · 16:31 /g · 3h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#36 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010California571 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 120 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,008 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#18 (of 120 teams · 318.8 yds/g allowed · 3,825 yards)#40 (of 120 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.3 /g · +39 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.17 /g)#51 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#27 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.925 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.929 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oregon1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 530.4 yds/g · 6,895 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47.0 pts/g · 611 points)#34 (of 120 teams · 346.0 yds/g allowed · 4,498 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +28.3 /g · +368 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 37 taken, 24 given · +1.00 /g)#111 (of 120 teams · 16:59 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#19 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oregon State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 120 teams · 326.5 yds/g · 3,918 yards)#82 (of 120 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#86 (of 120 teams · 407.9 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yards)#64 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 322 points)#79 (of 120 teams · -2.4 /g · -29 on the season)#36 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.33 /g)#112 (of 120 teams · 16:59 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#94 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Stanford1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 472.5 yds/g · 6,142 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 40.3 pts/g · 524 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.9 /g · +298 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 30 taken, 17 given · +1.00 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 21:04 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#67 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.921 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UCLA480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 120 teams · 316.7 yds/g · 3,800 yards)#104 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 242 points)#94 (of 120 teams · 420.1 yds/g allowed · 5,041 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 364 points)#98 (of 120 teams · -10.2 /g · -122 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 18 taken, 29 given · -0.92 /g)#77 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#81 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.827 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Washington760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 120 teams · 362.7 yds/g · 4,715 yards)#96 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 284 points)#70 (of 120 teams · 384.9 yds/g allowed · 5,003 yards)#80 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#92 (of 120 teams · -7.5 /g · -97 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:40 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#87 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.975 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Washington State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 330.2 yds/g · 3,962 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#118 (of 120 teams · 467.0 yds/g allowed · 5,604 yards)#110 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#111 (of 120 teams · -16.3 /g · -195 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#78 (of 120 teams · 18:07 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 120 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#114 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.082 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20102010 USCPac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #29
Total offense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #1 of 120; 2010 Stanford #14 of 120; 2010 Arizona #24 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #29 of 120; 2010 Washington #76 of 120; 2010 California #90 of 120; 2010 Washington State #92 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #94 of 120; 2010 UCLA #100 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 26 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 29.
Scoring offensemedian #53
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #1 of 120; 2010 Stanford #9 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2010 Arizona #53 of 120; 2010 California #73 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 Washington #96 of 120; 2010 UCLA #104 of 120; 2010 Washington State #106 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 37 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 53.
Total defensemedian #57
Total defense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 California #18 of 120; 2010 Stanford #22 of 120; 2010 Arizona #33 of 120; 2010 Oregon #34 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #57 of 120; 2010 Washington #70 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #86 of 120; 2010 UCLA #94 of 120; 2010 Washington State #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 84 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 57.
Scoring defensemedian #55
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #10 of 120; 2010 Oregon #12 of 120; 2010 California #40 of 120; 2010 Arizona #41 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #55 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #64 of 120; 2010 Washington #80 of 120; 2010 UCLA #86 of 120; 2010 Washington State #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 63 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 55.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #3 of 120; 2010 Stanford #5 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #38 of 120; 2010 Arizona #45 of 120; 2010 California #55 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #79 of 120; 2010 Washington #92 of 120; 2010 UCLA #98 of 120; 2010 Washington State #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 51 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #7 of 120; 2010 Stanford #7 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #36 of 120; 2010 California #45 of 120; 2010 Washington #47 of 120; 2010 Washington State #64 of 120; 2010 Arizona #74 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #84 of 120; 2010 UCLA #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 38 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #75
Possession. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #1 of 120; 2010 California #51 of 120; 2010 Washington #63 of 120; 2010 Arizona #75 of 120; 2010 UCLA #77 of 120; 2010 Washington State #78 of 120; 2010 Oregon #111 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #112 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 11 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 75.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 USC, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 USC, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 USC, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 USC, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #49
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #9 of 120; 2010 Arizona #18 of 120; 2010 Oregon #21 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #49 of 120; 2010 Washington #64 of 120; 2010 California #80 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 Washington State #84 of 120; 2010 UCLA #94 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 28 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 49.
Defensive EPAmedian #49
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #5 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #13 of 120; 2010 Stanford #44 of 120; 2010 Arizona #47 of 120; 2010 California #49 of 120; 2010 UCLA #85 of 120; 2010 Washington #90 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #98 of 120; 2010 Washington State #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 106 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 49.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #7 of 120; 2010 Oregon #20 of 120; 2010 Arizona #22 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #44 of 120; 2010 UCLA #75 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 California #83 of 120; 2010 Washington #86 of 120; 2010 Washington State #95 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 27 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #67
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #19 of 120; 2010 Arizona #26 of 120; 2010 California #27 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #36 of 120; 2010 Stanford #67 of 120; 2010 UCLA #81 of 120; 2010 Washington #87 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #94 of 120; 2010 Washington State #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 100 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 67.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Washington State #1 of 120; 2010 Washington #19 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #22 of 120; 2010 Arizona #28 of 120; 2010 Oregon #41 of 120; 2010 California #57 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #70 of 120; 2010 Stanford #91 of 120; 2010 UCLA #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 45 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Arizona State #26 of 120; 2010 Oregon #51 of 120; 2010 Washington #54 of 120; 2010 Stanford #58 of 120; 2010 California #62 of 120; 2010 UCLA #67 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #71 of 120; 2010 Washington State #85 of 120; 2010 Arizona #97 of 120. Marked: 2010 USC, ranked 83 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 62.