UT Martin game log
2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.
Season
Game log
Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.
Success rate
UT Martin on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.
37
48
52
20
40
56
35
57
30
47
34
34
32
23
39
61
43
54
Central Arkansas
Chicago State
@ West Virginia
@ Memphis
@ Austin Peay
@ Tennessee State
Gardner-Webb
@ Western Illinois
Eastern Illinois
@ Charleston Southern
Lindenwood
@ Southeast Missouri State
Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 40.0%, defense allows 56.5%.
Success by play
Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.
Down
Play
Min to go
Player
Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 38% (220 of 580)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 45% (250 of 551)
SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps
No player qualifies under these filters.
vs Central Arkansas
24–36 L · 57 plays to 71UT Martin offense 37% (21/57)Central Arkansas offense 48% (34/71)
UT Martin offense
37%
21 of 57 plays
Play #
Central Arkansas offenseUT Martin defense
48%
34 of 71 plays
vs Chicago State
42–7 W · 64 plays to 59UT Martin offense 52% (33/64)Chicago State offense 20% (12/59)
UT Martin offense
52%
33 of 64 plays
Play #
Chicago State offenseUT Martin defense
20%
12 of 59 plays
at West Virginia
7–52 L · 70 plays to 62UT Martin offense 40% (28/70)West Virginia offense 56% (35/62)
UT Martin offense
40%
28 of 70 plays
Play #
West Virginia offenseUT Martin defense
56%
35 of 62 plays
at Memphis
21–45 L · 57 plays to 75UT Martin offense 35% (20/57)Memphis offense 57% (43/75)
UT Martin offense
35%
20 of 57 plays
Play #
Memphis offenseUT Martin defense
57%
43 of 75 plays
at Austin Peay
12–35 L · 63 plays to 51UT Martin offense 30% (19/63)Austin Peay offense 47% (24/51)
UT Martin offense
30%
19 of 63 plays
Play #
Austin Peay offenseUT Martin defense
47%
24 of 51 plays
at Tennessee State
42–28 W · 62 plays to 59UT Martin offense 34% (21/62)Tennessee State offense 34% (20/59)
UT Martin offense
34%
21 of 62 plays
Play #
Tennessee State offenseUT Martin defense
34%
20 of 59 plays
vs Gardner-Webb
17–6 W · 77 plays to 52UT Martin offense 32% (25/77)Gardner-Webb offense 23% (12/52)
UT Martin offense
32%
25 of 77 plays
Play #
Gardner-Webb offenseUT Martin defense
23%
12 of 52 plays
at Western Illinois
24–55 L · 70 plays to 61UT Martin offense 39% (27/70)Western Illinois offense 61% (37/61)
UT Martin offense
39%
27 of 70 plays
Play #
Western Illinois offenseUT Martin defense
61%
37 of 61 plays
vs Eastern Illinois
16–45 L · 60 plays to 61UT Martin offense 43% (26/60)Eastern Illinois offense 54% (33/61)
UT Martin offense
43%
26 of 60 plays
Play #
Eastern Illinois offenseUT Martin defense
54%
33 of 61 plays