THIRD AND DATA

UT Martin game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27vs Central Arkansas24–36 L572965.233–14913–24–147163–113–422–1629:4237%48%
Sep 5vs Chicago State42–7 W644777.538–21617–26–261255–91–1213–11029:1952%20%
Sep 12at West Virginia7–52 L703184.537–14822–33–170187–161–326–5934:4440%56%
Sep 19at Memphis21–45 L572915.128–11417–29–177147–130–108–5028:4635%57%
Sep 26at Austin Peay12–35 L632974.736–12220–27–175135–150–224–2032:1330%47%
Oct 10at Tennessee State42–28 W663074.745–19315–21–114193–143–4210–10534:2234%34%
Oct 17vs Gardner-Webb17–6 W783104.053–21810–25–92167–191–236–5241:0132%23%
Oct 24at Western Illinois24–55 L703665.233–9019–37–276205–131–334–2829:4739%61%
Oct 31vs Eastern Illinois16–45 L603415.732–23614–28–105163–111–124–3028:4443%54%
Season9 games3–65853,0035.1335–1486147–250–1,51715745–12111–211857–4704:48:3838%45%

Success rate

UT Martin on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game37.9% · 45.4%
37
48
52
20
40
56
35
57
30
47
34
34
32
23
39
61
43
54
Central Arkansas
Chicago State
@ West Virginia
@ Memphis
@ Austin Peay
@ Tennessee State
Gardner-Webb
@ Western Illinois
Eastern Illinois
@ Charleston Southern
Lindenwood
@ Southeast Missouri State

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 40.0%, defense allows 56.5%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 38% (220 of 580)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 45% (250 of 551)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Central Arkansas: opponent offense 48% of 71Central Arkansas: UT Martin offense 37% of 57Chicago State: opponent offense 20% of 59Chicago State: UT Martin offense 52% of 64West Virginia: opponent offense 56% of 62West Virginia: UT Martin offense 40% of 70Memphis: opponent offense 57% of 75Memphis: UT Martin offense 35% of 57Austin Peay: opponent offense 47% of 51Austin Peay: UT Martin offense 30% of 63Tennessee State: opponent offense 34% of 59Tennessee State: UT Martin offense 34% of 62Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 23% of 52Gardner-Webb: UT Martin offense 32% of 77Western Illinois: opponent offense 61% of 61Western Illinois: UT Martin offense 39% of 70Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 54% of 61Eastern Illinois: UT Martin offense 43% of 60
UT Martin offenseOpponent offense (UT Martin defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Central Arkansas

24–36 L · 57 plays to 71
UT Martin offense 37% (21/57)Central Arkansas offense 48% (34/71)

vs Chicago State

42–7 W · 64 plays to 59
UT Martin offense 52% (33/64)Chicago State offense 20% (12/59)

at West Virginia

7–52 L · 70 plays to 62
UT Martin offense 40% (28/70)West Virginia offense 56% (35/62)

at Memphis

21–45 L · 57 plays to 75
UT Martin offense 35% (20/57)Memphis offense 57% (43/75)

at Austin Peay

12–35 L · 63 plays to 51
UT Martin offense 30% (19/63)Austin Peay offense 47% (24/51)

at Tennessee State

42–28 W · 62 plays to 59
UT Martin offense 34% (21/62)Tennessee State offense 34% (20/59)

vs Gardner-Webb

17–6 W · 77 plays to 52
UT Martin offense 32% (25/77)Gardner-Webb offense 23% (12/52)

at Western Illinois

24–55 L · 70 plays to 61
UT Martin offense 39% (27/70)Western Illinois offense 61% (37/61)

vs Eastern Illinois

16–45 L · 60 plays to 61
UT Martin offense 43% (26/60)Eastern Illinois offense 54% (33/61)