THIRD AND DATA

UT Martin game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 28at Oklahoma State7–27 L552254.138–11610–17–109136–150–017–5028:3934%39%
Sep 6at UTEP17–42 L763714.940–7624–36–295194–172–616–3538:4837%37%
Sep 13vs Southern Illinois10–37 L602914.828–11323–32–178165–130–228–5530:5535%49%
Sep 20at Missouri State10–42 L572213.925–7123–32–150145–141–133–3529:3236%46%
Sep 27vs Southeast Missouri State34–10 W694686.846–24315–23–225226–130–106–6035:0244%33%
Oct 4at Lindenwood14–30 L612984.927–13026–34–168204–101–218–9029:1147%40%
Oct 11vs Western Illinois32–31 W734456.144–20020–29–245238–150–1111–10136:3351%53%
Oct 18at Gardner-Webb37–7 W644086.448–24415–16–164209–161–104–3539:4144%36%
Nov 1at Eastern Illinois27–20 W773975.248–22522–29–1722610–160–209–6839:1555%48%
Nov 8vs Tennessee State26–7 W673395.153–2928–14–47197–150–102–2038:5941%33%
Nov 15vs Charleston Southern17–14 W624026.536–15018–26–252216–130–014–3534:1944%42%
Nov 22at Tennessee Tech17–20 L652523.939–9718–26–155177–151–104–6034:4238%45%
Season12 games6–67864,1175.2472–1957222–314–2,16023077–1726–181072–6446:55:3643%41%

Success rate

UT Martin on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game42.7% · 41.4%
34
39
37
37
35
49
36
46
44
33
47
40
51
53
44
36
55
48
41
33
44
42
38
45
@ Oklahoma State
@ UTEP
Southern Illinois
@ Missouri State
Southeast Missouri State
@ Lindenwood
Western Illinois
@ Gardner-Webb
@ Eastern Illinois
Tennessee State
Charleston Southern
@ Tennessee Tech

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 33.9%, defense allows 38.7%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 43% (328 of 769)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 41% (286 of 690)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Oklahoma State: opponent offense 39% of 75Oklahoma State: UT Martin offense 34% of 56UTEP: opponent offense 37% of 54UTEP: UT Martin offense 37% of 75Southern Illinois: opponent offense 49% of 57Southern Illinois: UT Martin offense 35% of 60Missouri State: opponent offense 46% of 59Missouri State: UT Martin offense 36% of 55Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 33% of 67Southeast Missouri State: UT Martin offense 44% of 68Lindenwood: opponent offense 40% of 55Lindenwood: UT Martin offense 47% of 62Western Illinois: opponent offense 53% of 51Western Illinois: UT Martin offense 51% of 68Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 36% of 61Gardner-Webb: UT Martin offense 44% of 61Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 48% of 44Eastern Illinois: UT Martin offense 55% of 76Tennessee State: opponent offense 33% of 51Tennessee State: UT Martin offense 41% of 66Charleston Southern: opponent offense 42% of 52Charleston Southern: UT Martin offense 44% of 59Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 45% of 64Tennessee Tech: UT Martin offense 38% of 63
UT Martin offenseOpponent offense (UT Martin defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Oklahoma State

7–27 L · 56 plays to 75
UT Martin offense 34% (19/56)Oklahoma State offense 39% (29/75)

at UTEP

17–42 L · 75 plays to 54
UT Martin offense 37% (28/75)UTEP offense 37% (20/54)

vs Southern Illinois

10–37 L · 60 plays to 57
UT Martin offense 35% (21/60)Southern Ill. offense 49% (28/57)

at Missouri State

10–42 L · 55 plays to 59
UT Martin offense 36% (20/55)Missouri State offense 46% (27/59)

vs Southeast Missouri State

34–10 W · 68 plays to 67
UT Martin offense 44% (30/68)SE. Missouri St. offense 33% (22/67)

at Lindenwood

14–30 L · 62 plays to 55
UT Martin offense 47% (29/62)Lindenwood offense 40% (22/55)

vs Western Illinois

32–31 W · 68 plays to 51
UT Martin offense 51% (35/68)Western Illinois offense 53% (27/51)

at Gardner-Webb

37–7 W · 61 plays to 61
UT Martin offense 44% (27/61)Gardner-Webb offense 36% (22/61)

at Eastern Illinois

27–20 W · 76 plays to 44
UT Martin offense 55% (42/76)Eastern Illinois offense 48% (21/44)

vs Tennessee State

26–7 W · 66 plays to 51
UT Martin offense 41% (27/66)Tennessee State offense 33% (17/51)

vs Charleston Southern

17–14 W · 59 plays to 52
UT Martin offense 44% (26/59)Charleston S. offense 42% (22/52)

at Tennessee Tech

17–20 L · 63 plays to 64
UT Martin offense 38% (24/63)Tennessee Tech offense 45% (29/64)