THIRD AND DATA

UT Rio Grande Valley game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 30vs Sul Ross State66–0 W6267410.935–23626–27–438297–90–018–7130:3755%16%
Sep 6at Prairie View A&M27–21 W654096.334–14619–31–263242–111–107–7628:41——
Sep 13vs Langston80–0 W6075112.536–46216–24–289274–101–2010–11529:3151%—
Sep 20vs Texas Wesleyan61–13 W735307.341–28319–32–247218–150–113–2029:1642%—
Sep 27at SE Louisiana31–45 L634577.329–21718–34–240193–120–115–3626:4340%56%
Oct 4vs Houston Christian27–7 W603385.639–20711–21–131164–110–125–3431:2338%33%
Oct 18at Lamar21–23 L551893.433–839–22–106122–132–212–1025:1435%41%
Oct 25vs Incarnate Word56–28 W665488.329–10827–37–440237–130–102–1528:2648%39%
Nov 1at Stephen F. Austin17–41 L472154.621–10016–26–115156–110–025–5121:5540%51%
Nov 8vs Nicholls28–21 W623926.332–14520–30–247198–140–019–7227:3745%38%
Nov 15at McNeese28–13 W533656.924–10817–29–257188–130–001–523:3642%42%
Nov 22vs East Texas A&M33–14 W573125.534–17117–23–141252–60–004–5029:5361%43%
Season12 games9–37235,1807.2387–2266215–336–2,91424861–1384–9961–5555:32:5245%41%

Success rate

UT Rio Grande on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game45.4% · 40.9%
55
16
51
42
40
56
38
33
35
41
48
39
40
51
45
38
42
42
61
43
Sul Ross State
@ Prairie View A&M
Langston
Texas Wesleyan
@ SE Louisiana
Houston Christian
@ Lamar
Incarnate Word
@ Stephen F. Austin
Nicholls
@ McNeese
East Texas A&M

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Rio Grande on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Rio Grande's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Rio Grande offense 45% (300 of 661)Opponent offense / UT Rio Grande defense 41% (263 of 643)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Sul Ross State: opponent offense 16% of 45Sul Ross State: UT Rio Grande offense 55% of 65Langston: UT Rio Grande offense 51% of 63Texas Wesleyan: UT Rio Grande offense 42% of 73SE Louisiana: opponent offense 56% of 63SE Louisiana: UT Rio Grande offense 40% of 62Houston Christian: opponent offense 33% of 69Houston Christian: UT Rio Grande offense 38% of 60Lamar: opponent offense 41% of 71Lamar: UT Rio Grande offense 35% of 55Incarnate Word: opponent offense 39% of 82Incarnate Word: UT Rio Grande offense 48% of 65Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 51% of 88Stephen F. Austin: UT Rio Grande offense 40% of 47Nicholls: opponent offense 38% of 74Nicholls: UT Rio Grande offense 45% of 62McNeese: opponent offense 42% of 76McNeese: UT Rio Grande offense 42% of 53East Texas A&M: opponent offense 43% of 75East Texas A&M: UT Rio Grande offense 61% of 56
Sul Ross State@ Prairie View A&MLangstonTexas Wesleyan@ SE LouisianaHouston Christian@ LamarIncarnate Word@ Stephen F. AustinNicholls@ McNeeseEast Texas A&M
UT Rio Grande offenseOpponent offense (UT Rio Grande defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Sul Ross State

66–0 W · 65 plays to 45
UT Rio Grande offense 55% (36/65)Sul Ross State offense 16% (7/45)

vs Langston

80–0 W · 63 plays to 0
UT Rio Grande offense 51% (32/63)Langston offense — (0/0)

vs Texas Wesleyan

61–13 W · 73 plays to 0
UT Rio Grande offense 42% (31/73)Texas Wesleyan offense — (0/0)

at SE Louisiana

31–45 L · 62 plays to 63
UT Rio Grande offense 40% (25/62)SE Louisiana offense 56% (35/63)

vs Houston Christian

27–7 W · 60 plays to 69
UT Rio Grande offense 38% (23/60)HCU offense 33% (23/69)

at Lamar

21–23 L · 55 plays to 71
UT Rio Grande offense 35% (19/55)Lamar offense 41% (29/71)

vs Incarnate Word

56–28 W · 65 plays to 82
UT Rio Grande offense 48% (31/65)Incarnate Word offense 39% (32/82)

at Stephen F. Austin

17–41 L · 47 plays to 88
UT Rio Grande offense 40% (19/47)SFA offense 51% (45/88)

vs Nicholls

28–21 W · 62 plays to 74
UT Rio Grande offense 45% (28/62)Nicholls offense 38% (28/74)

at McNeese

28–13 W · 53 plays to 76
UT Rio Grande offense 42% (22/53)McNeese offense 42% (32/76)

vs East Texas A&M

33–14 W · 56 plays to 75
UT Rio Grande offense 61% (34/56)East Texas A&M offense 43% (32/75)