THIRD AND DATA

UT Rio Grande Valley game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs UT Permian Basin44–0 W826758.247–27123–35–404297–151–124–3038:4351%28%
Sep 5at UTSA16–45 L814225.234–17726–47–245227–181–3213–10534:4938%65%
Sep 12at Nicholls28–31 L783274.233–6319–45–264217–184–4310–8529:4439%35%
Sep 19vs McNeese27–10 W694887.141–31513–28–173265–130–1110–8433:3744%34%
Oct 3at East Texas A&M17–20 L602654.427–7217–33–193145–140–127–5526:5033%39%
Oct 10vs SE Louisiana13–3 W583105.321–6623–37–244178–130–015–3725:3638%49%
Oct 17at Incarnate Word16–41 L763314.429–5629–47–275224–162–347–6732:4332%54%
Oct 24at Central Arkansas30–27 W694186.134–17724–35–241267–130–0111–9027:5152%50%
Oct 31vs Lamar23–52 L512825.524–13110–27–151162–100–121–522:5524%46%
Season9 games4–56243,5185.6290–1328184–334–2,19019352–1308–141868–5584:32:4840%45%

Success rate

UT Rio Grande on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game39.6% · 44.8%
51
28
38
65
39
35
44
34
33
39
38
49
32
54
52
50
24
46
UT Permian Basin
@ UTSA
@ Nicholls
McNeese
@ East Texas A&M
SE Louisiana
@ Incarnate Word
@ Central Arkansas
Lamar
@ Northwestern State
Stephen F. Austin
@ Houston Christian

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Rio Grande on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Rio Grande's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Rio Grande offense 40% (246 of 621)Opponent offense / UT Rio Grande defense 45% (262 of 585)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%UT Permian Basin: opponent offense 28% of 47UT Permian Basin: UT Rio Grande offense 51% of 81UTSA: opponent offense 65% of 57UTSA: UT Rio Grande offense 38% of 81Nicholls: opponent offense 35% of 74Nicholls: UT Rio Grande offense 39% of 80McNeese: opponent offense 34% of 61McNeese: UT Rio Grande offense 44% of 68East Texas A&M: opponent offense 39% of 67East Texas A&M: UT Rio Grande offense 33% of 60SE Louisiana: opponent offense 49% of 68SE Louisiana: UT Rio Grande offense 38% of 56Incarnate Word: opponent offense 54% of 70Incarnate Word: UT Rio Grande offense 32% of 76Central Arkansas: opponent offense 50% of 76Central Arkansas: UT Rio Grande offense 52% of 69Lamar: opponent offense 46% of 65Lamar: UT Rio Grande offense 24% of 50
UT Rio Grande offenseOpponent offense (UT Rio Grande defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs UT Permian Basin

44–0 W · 81 plays to 47
UT Rio Grande offense 51% (41/81)UT Permian Basin offense 28% (13/47)

at UTSA

16–45 L · 81 plays to 57
UT Rio Grande offense 38% (31/81)UTSA offense 65% (37/57)

at Nicholls

28–31 L · 80 plays to 74
UT Rio Grande offense 39% (31/80)Nicholls offense 35% (26/74)

vs McNeese

27–10 W · 68 plays to 61
UT Rio Grande offense 44% (30/68)McNeese offense 34% (21/61)

at East Texas A&M

17–20 L · 60 plays to 67
UT Rio Grande offense 33% (20/60)East Texas A&M offense 39% (26/67)

vs SE Louisiana

13–3 W · 56 plays to 68
UT Rio Grande offense 38% (21/56)SE Louisiana offense 49% (33/68)

at Incarnate Word

16–41 L · 76 plays to 70
UT Rio Grande offense 32% (24/76)Incarnate Word offense 54% (38/70)

at Central Arkansas

30–27 W · 69 plays to 76
UT Rio Grande offense 52% (36/69)Central Arkansas offense 50% (38/76)

vs Lamar

23–52 L · 50 plays to 65
UT Rio Grande offense 24% (12/50)Lamar offense 46% (30/65)