Metrics

UtahUtes

Season
Current

Mountain West

Mountain West, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009Utah1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 389.5 yds/g · 5,064 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#19 (of 120 teams · 313.9 yds/g allowed · 4,080 yards)#23 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +9.6 /g · +125 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 25 taken, 20 given · +0.38 /g)#35 (of 120 teams · 19:18 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.800 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Mountain West teams in 20090 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#78 (Total offense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #7–#107. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #5–#113. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#74 (Total defense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #1–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#73 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #6–#113. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#99 (Point margin: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #1–#114. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#60 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #1–#111. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#59 (Possession: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #16–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#54 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #4–#109. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #2–#120. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #3–#113. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #1–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#86 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #3–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range #3–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2009Air Force850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 120 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,834 yards)#36 (of 120 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 386 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 288.3 yds/g allowed · 3,748 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +14.0 /g · +182 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22 on the season · 34 taken, 12 given · +1.69 /g)#16 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 4h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#32 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 120 teams · 0.805 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.779 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009BYU1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 5,553 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,278 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +13.9 /g · +181 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 24 taken, 24 given · +0.00 /g)#59 (of 120 teams · 18:39 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.881 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Colorado State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 120 teams · 351.2 yds/g · 4,214 yards)#97 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#78 (of 120 teams · 387.8 yds/g allowed · 4,653 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#102 (of 120 teams · -8.2 /g · -98 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#84 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#104 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.936 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.925 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009New Mexico1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#103 (of 120 teams · 315.3 yds/g · 3,784 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 196 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 418.7 yds/g allowed · 5,024 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 431 points)#114 (of 120 teams · -19.6 /g · -235 on the season)#96 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 20 taken, 26 given · -0.50 /g)#109 (of 120 teams · 17:06 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#91 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009San Diego State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 341.9 yds/g · 4,103 yards)#85 (of 120 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 280 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#99 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#111 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 15 taken, 25 given · -0.83 /g)#110 (of 120 teams · 16:58 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#47 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.052 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 120 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009TCU1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 456.7 yds/g · 5,937 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.3 pts/g · 498 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 239.7 yds/g allowed · 3,116 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.5 /g · +332 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#38 (of 120 teams · 19:13 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.766 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009UNLV570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 120 teams · 351.3 yds/g · 4,215 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#115 (of 120 teams · 456.2 yds/g allowed · 5,474 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 389 points)#100 (of 120 teams · -7.6 /g · -91 on the season)#76 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 16 taken, 19 given · -0.25 /g)#54 (of 120 teams · 18:43 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 120 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#117 (of 120 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Wyoming760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 120 teams · 309.4 yds/g · 4,022 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 238 points)#81 (of 120 teams · 393.3 yds/g allowed · 5,113 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#105 (of 120 teams · -9.0 /g · -117 on the season)#17 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#99 (of 120 teams · 17:31 /g · 3h 48m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 120 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#94 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.876 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mountain West, 20092009 UtahMountain West medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #78
Total offense. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 BYU #21 of 120; 2009 Air Force #66 of 120; 2009 UNLV #78 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #79 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #86 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #103 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #107 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 54 of 120. Mountain West median rank 78.
Scoring offensemedian #77
Scoring offense. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #5 of 120; 2009 BYU #11 of 120; 2009 Air Force #36 of 120; 2009 UNLV #77 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #85 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #97 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #109 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 34 of 120. Mountain West median rank 77.
Total defensemedian #74
Total defense. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Air Force #11 of 120; 2009 BYU #28 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #74 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #78 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #81 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #100 of 120; 2009 UNLV #115 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 19 of 120. Mountain West median rank 74.
Scoring defensemedian #73
Scoring defense. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #6 of 120; 2009 Air Force #10 of 120; 2009 BYU #29 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #73 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #93 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #98 of 120; 2009 UNLV #103 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 23 of 120. Mountain West median rank 73.
Point marginmedian #99
Point margin. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Air Force #14 of 120; 2009 BYU #15 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #99 of 120; 2009 UNLV #100 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #102 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #105 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #114 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 25 of 120. Mountain West median rank 99.
Turnover marginmedian #60
Turnover margin. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Air Force #1 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #17 of 120; 2009 TCU #52 of 120; 2009 BYU #60 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #60 of 120; 2009 UNLV #76 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #96 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #111 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 32 of 120. Mountain West median rank 60.
Possessionmedian #59
Possession. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Air Force #16 of 120; 2009 TCU #38 of 120; 2009 UNLV #54 of 120; 2009 BYU #59 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #84 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #99 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #109 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #110 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 35 of 120. Mountain West median rank 59.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #54
Offensive EPA. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 BYU #4 of 120; 2009 TCU #33 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #48 of 120; 2009 Air Force #53 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #54 of 120; 2009 UNLV #74 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #97 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #109 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 87 of 120. Mountain West median rank 54.
Defensive EPAmedian #71
Defensive EPA. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #2 of 120; 2009 Air Force #17 of 120; 2009 BYU #43 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #71 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #78 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #79 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #99 of 120; 2009 UNLV #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 9 of 120. Mountain West median rank 71.
Offensive success ratemedian #58
Offensive success rate. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 BYU #3 of 120; 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #52 of 120; 2009 UNLV #58 of 120; 2009 Air Force #68 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #92 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #108 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 34 of 120. Mountain West median rank 58.
Defensive success ratemedian #47
Defensive success rate. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Air Force #32 of 120; 2009 BYU #35 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #47 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #91 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #94 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #104 of 120; 2009 UNLV #117 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 16 of 120. Mountain West median rank 47.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #86
Offensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 San Diego State #3 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #15 of 120; 2009 UNLV #34 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #50 of 120; 2009 BYU #86 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #91 of 120; 2009 Air Force #116 of 120; 2009 TCU #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 117 of 120. Mountain West median rank 86.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #54
Defensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Air Force #3 of 120; 2009 New Mexico #27 of 120; 2009 BYU #30 of 120; 2009 Wyoming #47 of 120; 2009 UNLV #54 of 120; 2009 Colorado State #64 of 120; 2009 TCU #108 of 120; 2009 San Diego State #115 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 67 of 120. Mountain West median rank 54.