Metrics

UtahUtes

Season
Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2009, released in week 15.

AP Top 25, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009Utah1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 389.5 yds/g · 5,064 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#19 (of 120 teams · 313.9 yds/g allowed · 4,080 yards)#23 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +9.6 /g · +125 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 25 taken, 20 given · +0.38 /g)#35 (of 120 teams · 19:18 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.800 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #6–#112. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#86. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#90. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#69. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#54. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#71. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#118. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#105. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#109. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#101. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#105. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #14–#119. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #2–#119. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)
2009Alabama1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 403.0 yds/g · 5,642 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 244.4 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.4 /g · +285 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.36 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:22 /g · 4h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.807 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Texas1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 5,897 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 550 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 251.9 yds/g allowed · 3,527 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 234 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.6 /g · +316 on the season)#13 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 37 taken, 27 given · +0.71 /g)#18 (of 120 teams · 19:34 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.875 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009TCU1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 456.7 yds/g · 5,937 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.3 pts/g · 498 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 239.7 yds/g allowed · 3,116 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.5 /g · +332 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#38 (of 120 teams · 19:13 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.766 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Cincinnati1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 120 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 5,817 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.6 pts/g · 502 points)#68 (of 120 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 4,870 yards)#44 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15.5 /g · +202 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.69 /g)#118 (of 120 teams · 16:08 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#76 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.919 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Florida1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 457.9 yds/g · 6,410 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 252.6 yds/g allowed · 3,536 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.4 pts/g allowed · 174 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.4 /g · +328 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.50 /g)#60 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 4h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#17 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Boise State1400 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +351 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#47 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oregon1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 412.0 yds/g · 5,356 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 36.1 pts/g · 469 points)#35 (of 120 teams · 336.3 yds/g allowed · 4,372 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#103 (of 120 teams · 17:25 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#18 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.991 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Ohio State1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 369.0 yds/g · 4,797 yards)#49 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 262.3 yds/g allowed · 3,410 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.5 pts/g allowed · 163 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.5 /g · +214 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 35 taken, 18 given · +1.31 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#11 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.777 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Georgia Tech1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 120 teams · 422.1 yds/g · 5,910 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 473 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 360.3 yds/g allowed · 5,044 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#26 (of 120 teams · +9.0 /g · +126 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.57 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:29 /g · 4h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Iowa1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 120 teams · 336.3 yds/g · 4,372 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 301 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 276.5 yds/g allowed · 3,595 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 200 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 30 taken, 28 given · +0.15 /g)#23 (of 120 teams · 19:29 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Penn State1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 120 teams · 406.9 yds/g · 5,290 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 375 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 274.5 yds/g allowed · 3,568 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.2 pts/g allowed · 159 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.6 /g · +216 on the season)#26 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.46 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 21:05 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.919 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Virginia Tech1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 120 teams · 392.1 yds/g · 5,097 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#12 (of 120 teams · 295.5 yds/g allowed · 3,841 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.6 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.2 /g · +211 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 24 taken, 15 given · +0.69 /g)#69 (of 120 teams · 18:21 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.045 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009LSU943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 304.5 yds/g · 3,959 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 323 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 327.6 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +8.6 /g · +112 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Miami943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 120 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 5,199 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points)#29 (of 120 teams · 329.6 yds/g allowed · 4,285 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +8.2 /g · +106 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 21 taken, 21 given · +0.00 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.985 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009BYU1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 5,553 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,278 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +13.9 /g · +181 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 24 taken, 24 given · +0.00 /g)#59 (of 120 teams · 18:39 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.881 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oregon State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 410.6 yds/g · 5,338 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#46 (of 120 teams · 349.5 yds/g allowed · 4,543 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#42 (of 120 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.38 /g)#31 (of 120 teams · 19:20 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Pittsburgh1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 120 teams · 391.6 yds/g · 5,091 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 319.3 yds/g allowed · 4,151 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#11 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 24 taken, 14 given · +0.77 /g)#56 (of 120 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#41 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.919 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009West Virginia940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 (of 120 teams · 376.4 yds/g · 4,893 yards)#67 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 340 points)#36 (of 120 teams · 336.5 yds/g allowed · 4,374 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#47 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +58 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.15 /g)#36 (of 120 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Stanford850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 120 teams · 427.6 yds/g · 5,559 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#90 (of 120 teams · 402.7 yds/g allowed · 5,235 yards)#69 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#27 (of 120 teams · +8.9 /g · +116 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:08 /g · 4h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.974 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Nebraska1041 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 120 teams · 323.0 yds/g · 4,522 yards)#75 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 352 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 272.0 yds/g allowed · 3,808 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 10.4 pts/g allowed · 146 points)#12 (of 120 teams · +14.7 /g · +206 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 28 taken, 23 given · +0.36 /g)#37 (of 120 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oklahoma State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 120 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 4,774 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 369 points)#31 (of 120 teams · 332.5 yds/g allowed · 4,323 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +6.7 /g · +87 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 30 taken, 30 given · +0.00 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:21 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Arizona850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,999 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 356 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 322.2 yds/g allowed · 4,189 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#54 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#68 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 19:01 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#33 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Wisconsin1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 120 teams · 416.9 yds/g · 5,420 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 413 points)#17 (of 120 teams · 305.7 yds/g allowed · 3,974 yards)#33 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#23 (of 120 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 27 taken, 24 given · +0.23 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:39 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#12 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 120 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Central Michigan1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 423.1 yds/g · 5,924 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 475 points)#43 (of 120 teams · 344.2 yds/g allowed · 4,819 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +15.0 /g · +210 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.36 /g)#73 (of 120 teams · 18:17 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20092009 UtahAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 Boise State #10 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #19 of 120; 2009 BYU #21 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #24 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #26 of 120; 2009 Texas #29 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #30 of 120; 2009 Oregon #33 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #34 of 120; 2009 Penn State #37 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 Miami #45 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #50 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #52 of 120; 2009 Arizona #58 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #61 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #68 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #70 of 120; 2009 Iowa #89 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #99 of 120; 2009 LSU #112 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 54 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #24
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #1 of 120; 2009 Texas #3 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #4 of 120; 2009 TCU #5 of 120; 2009 Oregon #8 of 120; 2009 Florida #10 of 120; 2009 BYU #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #11 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #13 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #15 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #21 of 120; 2009 Alabama #22 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #24 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #26 of 120; 2009 Miami #31 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #49 of 120; 2009 Penn State #52 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #56 of 120; 2009 Arizona #61 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #67 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #75 of 120; 2009 LSU #76 of 120; 2009 Iowa #86 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 34 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Total defensemedian #23
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Texas #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #7 of 120; 2009 Penn State #9 of 120; 2009 Iowa #10 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #17 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #23 of 120; 2009 Arizona #25 of 120; 2009 LSU #26 of 120; 2009 BYU #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #29 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Oregon #35 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #36 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #43 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #46 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #54 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #68 of 120; 2009 Stanford #90 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 19 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Scoring defensemedian #19
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nebraska #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Penn State #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 TCU #6 of 120; 2009 Iowa #8 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #9 of 120; 2009 LSU #11 of 120; 2009 Texas #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #17 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #19 of 120; 2009 BYU #29 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #31 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #33 of 120; 2009 Miami #37 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #44 of 120; 2009 Oregon #51 of 120; 2009 Arizona #53 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #56 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #57 of 120; 2009 Stanford #69 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 23 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Point marginmedian #16
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Boise State #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Texas #4 of 120; 2009 Alabama #5 of 120; 2009 Penn State #6 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #8 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #9 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #10 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #11 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #12 of 120; 2009 BYU #15 of 120; 2009 Oregon #16 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #16 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #23 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #26 of 120; 2009 Stanford #27 of 120; 2009 LSU #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #31 of 120; 2009 Iowa #32 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #38 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #42 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #47 of 120; 2009 Arizona #54 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 25 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 16.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #3 of 120; 2009 Alabama #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #11 of 120; 2009 Texas #13 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #14 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Penn State #26 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #32 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #34 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #34 of 120; 2009 LSU #37 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #45 of 120; 2009 TCU #52 of 120; 2009 Oregon #52 of 120; 2009 Iowa #52 of 120; 2009 Miami #60 of 120; 2009 BYU #60 of 120; 2009 Stanford #60 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #60 of 120; 2009 Arizona #68 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #71 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 32 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Penn State #1 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #6 of 120; 2009 Alabama #7 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #8 of 120; 2009 Stanford #10 of 120; 2009 Texas #18 of 120; 2009 Iowa #23 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #30 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #31 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #36 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #37 of 120; 2009 TCU #38 of 120; 2009 Arizona #45 of 120; 2009 Boise State #47 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #56 of 120; 2009 BYU #59 of 120; 2009 Florida #60 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #69 of 120; 2009 Miami #71 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #73 of 120; 2009 Oregon #103 of 120; 2009 LSU #106 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 35 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Utah, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 BYU #4 of 120; 2009 Stanford #6 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #7 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #10 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #12 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #14 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #15 of 120; 2009 Boise State #22 of 120; 2009 Miami #26 of 120; 2009 Oregon #29 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #30 of 120; 2009 TCU #33 of 120; 2009 Penn State #36 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #41 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #49 of 120; 2009 Texas #58 of 120; 2009 LSU #60 of 120; 2009 Arizona #62 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #71 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #83 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #85 of 120; 2009 Iowa #105 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 87 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #30
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Texas #1 of 120; 2009 TCU #2 of 120; 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Boise State #6 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #7 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #8 of 120; 2009 Iowa #10 of 120; 2009 Penn State #16 of 120; 2009 LSU #18 of 120; 2009 Oregon #23 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #30 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Arizona #35 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #39 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #41 of 120; 2009 Miami #42 of 120; 2009 BYU #43 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #49 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #50 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #87 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #90 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #94 of 120; 2009 Stanford #109 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 9 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 30.
Offensive success ratemedian #28
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 BYU #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #8 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #9 of 120; 2009 Penn State #10 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Alabama #20 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #21 of 120; 2009 Texas #25 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #30 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #37 of 120; 2009 Oregon #41 of 120; 2009 Arizona #43 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #61 of 120; 2009 LSU #65 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #66 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #73 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #76 of 120; 2009 Iowa #96 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #101 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 34 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Defensive success ratemedian #18
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #4 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #5 of 120; 2009 Texas #6 of 120; 2009 Boise State #9 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #11 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #12 of 120; 2009 Penn State #14 of 120; 2009 Iowa #15 of 120; 2009 Florida #17 of 120; 2009 Oregon #18 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #26 of 120; 2009 Miami #28 of 120; 2009 LSU #29 of 120; 2009 Arizona #33 of 120; 2009 BYU #35 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #41 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #52 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #63 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #64 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #75 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #76 of 120; 2009 Stanford #105 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 16 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 18.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #73
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #16 of 120; 2009 Oregon #17 of 120; 2009 Miami #20 of 120; 2009 Stanford #27 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #28 of 120; 2009 Florida #46 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #49 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #61 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #62 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #64 of 120; 2009 Iowa #72 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #73 of 120; 2009 BYU #86 of 120; 2009 LSU #87 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #89 of 120; 2009 Texas #92 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #94 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #97 of 120; 2009 Boise State #98 of 120; 2009 Arizona #101 of 120; 2009 Penn State #104 of 120; 2009 Alabama #114 of 120; 2009 TCU #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 117 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 73.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Ohio State #2 of 120; 2009 Texas #10 of 120; 2009 Iowa #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 BYU #30 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #39 of 120; 2009 Boise State #41 of 120; 2009 Arizona #43 of 120; 2009 LSU #45 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #46 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #49 of 120; 2009 Penn State #61 of 120; 2009 Alabama #75 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #76 of 120; 2009 Oregon #78 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #80 of 120; 2009 Miami #84 of 120; 2009 Stanford #86 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #90 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #92 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #98 of 120; 2009 TCU #108 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #112 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 Utah, ranked 67 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 67.