Metrics

VanderbiltCommodores

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Vanderbilt480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 326.8 yds/g · 3,921 yards)#73 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 264 points)#47 (of 119 teams · 321.3 yds/g allowed · 3,856 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#70 (of 119 teams · -1.7 /g · -20 on the season)#56 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 29 taken, 28 given · +0.08 /g)#45 (of 119 teams · 18:28 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 119 teams · 1.034 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#51 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #16–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #9–#108. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#22 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #1–#118. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #4–#99. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #6–#96. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #4–#96. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#28 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #1–#95. 3 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#52 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #5–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #5–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #5–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #2–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #6–#104. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range #2–#108. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2006Alabama670 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 335.9 yds/g · 4,367 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 298 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 297.7 yds/g allowed · 3,870 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 250 points)#48 (of 119 teams · +3.7 /g · +48 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 28 taken, 23 given · +0.38 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:35 /g · 4h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.865 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Arkansas1040 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 347.4 yds/g · 4,864 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 404 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 281.0 yds/g allowed · 3,934 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#22 (of 119 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#73 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.21 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 18:10 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 119 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Auburn1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 306.9 yds/g · 3,990 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 322 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 268.5 yds/g allowed · 3,490 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +10.8 /g · +141 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 31 taken, 20 given · +0.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:24 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#49 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Florida1311 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 119 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 5,226 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 416 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 240.1 yds/g allowed · 3,361 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 189 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season)#41 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 30 taken, 25 given · +0.36 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:00 /g · 4h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 119 teams · -0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Georgia942 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 119 teams · 238.1 yds/g · 3,095 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 327 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 188.4 yds/g allowed · 2,449 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#33 (of 119 teams · +7.5 /g · +98 on the season)#68 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 31 taken, 33 given · -0.15 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:47 /g · 4h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 119 teams · -0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#32 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.973 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.792 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Kentucky850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 119 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,879 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 347 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 453.4 yds/g allowed · 5,894 yards)#99 (of 119 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#71 (of 119 teams · -1.7 /g · -22 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16 on the season · 35 taken, 19 given · +1.23 /g)#55 (of 119 teams · 18:13 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 119 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#110 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 119 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006LSU1121 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 393.5 yds/g · 5,116 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 228.8 yds/g allowed · 2,974 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.1 /g · +274 on the season)#53 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#11 (of 119 teams · 19:33 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Mississippi State390 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 119 teams · 262.0 yds/g · 3,144 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#22 (of 119 teams · 290.5 yds/g allowed · 3,486 yards)#83 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#96 (of 119 teams · -7.3 /g · -88 on the season)#96 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 21 taken, 28 given · -0.58 /g)#46 (of 119 teams · 18:26 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 119 teams · -0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#40 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.096 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Ole Miss480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 119 teams · 261.5 yds/g · 3,138 yards)#108 (of 119 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 188 points)#80 (of 119 teams · 353.9 yds/g allowed · 4,247 yards)#61 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#95 (of 119 teams · -7.3 /g · -87 on the season)#93 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 12 taken, 18 given · -0.50 /g)#91 (of 119 teams · 17:34 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 119 teams · -0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#86 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.867 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006South Carolina850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 119 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 5,135 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#66 (of 119 teams · 336.9 yds/g allowed · 4,379 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#31 (of 119 teams · +7.9 /g · +103 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.23 /g)#28 (of 119 teams · 18:56 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.150 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.051 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#47 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 119 teams · 1.047 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Tennessee941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 119 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#55 (of 119 teams · 327.5 yds/g allowed · 4,258 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#59 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#74 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20062006 VanderbiltSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #51
Total offense. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 South Carolina #16 of 119; 2006 LSU #18 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #28 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #51 of 119; 2006 Alabama #62 of 119; 2006 Auburn #92 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #109 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #110 of 119; 2006 Georgia #115 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 70 of 119. SEC median rank 51.
Scoring offensemedian #44
Scoring offense. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #23 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #31 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #43 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #44 of 119; 2006 Georgia #53 of 119; 2006 Auburn #56 of 119; 2006 Alabama #68 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #97 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #108 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 73 of 119. SEC median rank 44.
Total defensemedian #22
Total defense. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Georgia #1 of 119; 2006 LSU #3 of 119; 2006 Florida #5 of 119; 2006 Auburn #12 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #17 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #22 of 119; 2006 Alabama #27 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #55 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #66 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #80 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 47 of 119. SEC median rank 22.
Scoring defensemedian #29
Scoring defense. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #4 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Auburn #7 of 119; 2006 Georgia #20 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #24 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #29 of 119; 2006 Alabama #31 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #61 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #83 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #99 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 65 of 119. SEC median rank 29.
Point marginmedian #31
Point margin. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #6 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Auburn #21 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #22 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #31 of 119; 2006 Georgia #33 of 119; 2006 Alabama #48 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #71 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #95 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 70 of 119. SEC median rank 31.
Turnover marginmedian #56
Turnover margin. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Kentucky #4 of 119; 2006 Auburn #13 of 119; 2006 Alabama #36 of 119; 2006 Florida #41 of 119; 2006 LSU #53 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #59 of 119; 2006 Georgia #68 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #73 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #74 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #93 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 56 of 119. SEC median rank 56.
Possessionmedian #28
Possession. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Georgia #1 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Alabama #9 of 119; 2006 LSU #11 of 119; 2006 Auburn #14 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #28 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #46 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #55 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #58 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #91 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #95 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 45 of 119. SEC median rank 28.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #52
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #7 of 119; 2006 Florida #18 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #36 of 119; 2006 Auburn #40 of 119; 2006 Alabama #52 of 119; 2006 Georgia #59 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #83 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #86 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #106 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 69 of 119. SEC median rank 52.
Defensive EPAmedian #54
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #11 of 119; 2006 Georgia #12 of 119; 2006 Alabama #41 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #54 of 119; 2006 Auburn #60 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #71 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #75 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #77 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #109 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 73 of 119. SEC median rank 54.
Offensive success ratemedian #45
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 South Carolina #5 of 119; 2006 LSU #7 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Auburn #42 of 119; 2006 Alabama #45 of 119; 2006 Georgia #59 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #65 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #68 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #86 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 100 of 119. SEC median rank 45.
Defensive success ratemedian #47
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 LSU #2 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #5 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Georgia #32 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #40 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #47 of 119; 2006 Auburn #49 of 119; 2006 Alabama #50 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #74 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #86 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #110 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 82 of 119. SEC median rank 47.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #45
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Mississippi State #6 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #34 of 119; 2006 Georgia #37 of 119; 2006 LSU #40 of 119; 2006 Florida #45 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #57 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #59 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #73 of 119; 2006 Auburn #90 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #99 of 119; 2006 Alabama #104 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 18 of 119. SEC median rank 45.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #66
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Georgia #2 of 119; 2006 Ole Miss #22 of 119; 2006 Alabama #27 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #29 of 119; 2006 LSU #66 of 119; 2006 Auburn #70 of 119; 2006 Mississippi State #83 of 119; 2006 Kentucky #95 of 119; 2006 Florida #97 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #101 of 119; 2006 South Carolina #108 of 119. Marked: 2006 Vanderbilt, ranked 50 of 119. SEC median rank 66.