Metrics

VanderbiltCommodores

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009Vanderbilt2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 306.3 yds/g · 3,676 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 196 points)#56 (of 120 teams · 362.8 yds/g allowed · 4,353 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#97 (of 120 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#44 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.25 /g)#120 (of 120 teams · 15:51 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#59 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.887 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20091 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#60 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #6–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #9–#113. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #2–#89. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #2–#79. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #4–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #7–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#42 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#69. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #6–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#74. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #8–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #5–#97. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2009Alabama1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 403.0 yds/g · 5,642 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 244.4 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.4 /g · +285 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.36 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:22 /g · 4h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.807 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Arkansas850 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 120 teams · 427.3 yds/g · 5,555 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 468 points)#89 (of 120 teams · 401.1 yds/g allowed · 5,215 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#20 (of 120 teams · +10.9 /g · +142 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:20 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#72 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 1.002 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.883 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Auburn851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 5,613 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 433 points)#67 (of 120 teams · 374.4 yds/g allowed · 4,867 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#43 (of 120 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 25 taken, 22 given · +0.23 /g)#89 (of 120 teams · 17:45 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#57 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Florida1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 457.9 yds/g · 6,410 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 252.6 yds/g allowed · 3,536 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.4 pts/g allowed · 174 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.4 /g · +328 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.50 /g)#60 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 4h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#17 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Georgia855 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 362.1 yds/g · 4,708 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 339.4 yds/g allowed · 4,412 yards)#64 (of 120 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#58 (of 120 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#118 (of 120 teams · -16 on the season · 12 taken, 28 given · -1.23 /g)#83 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#40 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.016 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.925 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Kentucky760 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 120 teams · 331.5 yds/g · 4,310 yards)#70 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 339 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 4,676 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +3.4 /g · +44 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.15 /g)#65 (of 120 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009LSU943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 304.5 yds/g · 3,959 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 323 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 327.6 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +8.6 /g · +112 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Mississippi State570 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,463 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 307 points)#58 (of 120 teams · 366.0 yds/g allowed · 4,392 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#76 (of 120 teams · -1.2 /g · -14 on the season)#87 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.42 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:12 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 120 teams · -0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#74 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.897 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.802 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Ole Miss940 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 402.4 yds/g · 5,231 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 314.7 yds/g allowed · 4,091 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 17.7 pts/g allowed · 230 points)#19 (of 120 teams · +11.8 /g · +154 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 24 taken, 31 given · -0.54 /g)#51 (of 120 teams · 18:47 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#21 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009South Carolina761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 347.4 yds/g · 4,516 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 268 points)#15 (of 120 teams · 300.7 yds/g allowed · 3,909 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#68 (of 120 teams · +0.2 /g · +3 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#28 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 120 teams · -0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#19 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Tennessee762 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 383.6 yds/g · 4,987 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 318.8 yds/g allowed · 4,144 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#35 (of 120 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.23 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:49 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#68 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.824 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20092009 VanderbiltSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #60
Total offense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 Auburn #16 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #20 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #44 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #60 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #65 of 120; 2009 Georgia #75 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #82 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #93 of 120; 2009 LSU #112 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 110 of 120. SEC median rank 60.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Arkansas #9 of 120; 2009 Florida #10 of 120; 2009 Auburn #17 of 120; 2009 Alabama #22 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #39 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #43 of 120; 2009 Georgia #51 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #70 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #72 of 120; 2009 LSU #76 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #102 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 113 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #15 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #21 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #22 of 120; 2009 LSU #26 of 120; 2009 Georgia #38 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #53 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #58 of 120; 2009 Auburn #67 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #89 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 56 of 120. SEC median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #38
Scoring defense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 LSU #11 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #15 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #24 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #43 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #58 of 120; 2009 Georgia #64 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #71 of 120; 2009 Auburn #79 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 46 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Point marginmedian #35
Point margin. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Alabama #5 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #19 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #20 of 120; 2009 LSU #28 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #35 of 120; 2009 Auburn #43 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #56 of 120; 2009 Georgia #58 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #68 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #76 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 97 of 120. SEC median rank 35.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #4 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #6 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 LSU #37 of 120; 2009 Auburn #45 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #45 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #52 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #80 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #87 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #101 of 120; 2009 Georgia #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 44 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #60
Possession. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #7 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #28 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #49 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #51 of 120; 2009 Florida #60 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #65 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #70 of 120; 2009 Georgia #83 of 120; 2009 Auburn #89 of 120; 2009 LSU #106 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 120 of 120. SEC median rank 60.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #42
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #25 of 120; 2009 Auburn #32 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2009 Georgia #39 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 LSU #60 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #73 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #78 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #84 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #92 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 120 of 120. SEC median rank 42.
Defensive EPAmedian #24
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #12 of 120; 2009 LSU #18 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #20 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Auburn #27 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #37 of 120; 2009 Georgia #44 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #47 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #69 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 65 of 120. SEC median rank 24.
Offensive success ratemedian #51
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 Alabama #20 of 120; 2009 Auburn #27 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #33 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #50 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #51 of 120; 2009 LSU #65 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #70 of 120; 2009 Georgia #86 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #97 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #100 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 117 of 120. SEC median rank 51.
Defensive success ratemedian #40
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #17 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #19 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #21 of 120; 2009 LSU #29 of 120; 2009 Georgia #40 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #51 of 120; 2009 Auburn #57 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #68 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #74 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 59 of 120. SEC median rank 40.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Georgia #8 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #13 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #46 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #47 of 120; 2009 Auburn #53 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #55 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #70 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #76 of 120; 2009 LSU #87 of 120; 2009 Alabama #114 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 56 of 120. SEC median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Mississippi State #5 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #12 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #32 of 120; 2009 Auburn #33 of 120; 2009 LSU #45 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #59 of 120; 2009 Georgia #65 of 120; 2009 Alabama #75 of 120; 2009 Ole Miss #93 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #97 of 120. Marked: 2009 Vanderbilt, ranked 35 of 120. SEC median rank 35.