| 2018 | Virginia8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #82 (of 130 teams · 384.2 yds/g · 4,995 yards) | #70 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points) | #20 (of 130 teams · 331.5 yds/g allowed · 4,310 yards) | #21 (of 130 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points) | #41 (of 130 teams · +8.4 /g · +109 on the season) | #47 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:49 /g · 7h 33m on the season) | #120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning) | #72 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning) | #33 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning) | #66 (of 130 teams · 542.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #47 (of 130 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #49 (of 130 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #30 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #23 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #109 (of 130 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays) | #94 (of 130 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2018 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #63 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#109. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #61 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #4–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #69 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#117. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #72 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #1–#128. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #57 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #1–#129. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #53 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #5–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #83 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#120. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #49 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #17–#120. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #67 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #16–#114. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #33 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #8–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #39 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #5–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #66 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#117. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #60 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #2–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #71 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #7–#129. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #54 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #1–#129. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #61 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #4–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #60 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #24–#129. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2018 | Boston College7–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #65 (of 130 teams · 405.8 yds/g · 4,869 yards) | #39 (of 130 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 384 points) | #69 (of 130 teams · 394.9 yds/g allowed · 4,739 yards) | #55 (of 130 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points) | #47 (of 130 teams · +6.3 /g · +76 on the season) | #23 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.58 /g) | #101 (of 130 teams · 27:54 /g · 5h 35m on the season) | #61 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's passing production returning) | #22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning) | #72 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning) | #69 (of 130 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #94 (of 130 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #21 (of 130 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #107 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #37 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #17 (of 130 teams · 1.322 average PPA on successful plays) | #49 (of 130 teams · 1.191 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Clemson15–0 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 527.1 yds/g · 7,907 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 44.3 pts/g · 664 points) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 286.3 yds/g allowed · 4,295 yards) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.1 pts/g allowed · 197 points) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +31.1 /g · +467 on the season) | #29 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.47 /g) | #120 (of 130 teams · 26:51 /g · 6h 43m on the season) | #49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning) | #70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning) | #27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.344 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #18 (of 130 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays) | #36 (of 130 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Duke8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern) | #66 (of 130 teams · 405.7 yds/g · 5,274 yards) | #64 (of 130 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 382 points) | #77 (of 130 teams · 408.8 yds/g allowed · 5,314 yards) | #72 (of 130 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points) | #63 (of 130 teams · +2.0 /g · +26 on the season) | #111 (of 130 teams · -7 on the season · 13 taken, 20 given · -0.54 /g) | #107 (of 130 teams · 27:42 /g · 6h 00m on the season) | #17 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #16 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning) | #62 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing production returning) | #39 (of 130 teams · 635.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #91 (of 130 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #63 (of 130 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #83 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #33 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #63 (of 130 teams · 1.217 average PPA on successful plays) | #107 (of 130 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Florida State5–7 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #102 (of 130 teams · 361.6 yds/g · 4,339 yards) | #113 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 263 points) | #81 (of 130 teams · 416.3 yds/g allowed · 4,995 yards) | #90 (of 130 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 378 points) | #110 (of 130 teams · -9.6 /g · -115 on the season) | #124 (of 130 teams · -11 on the season · 15 taken, 26 given · -0.92 /g) | #111 (of 130 teams · 27:36 /g · 5h 31m on the season) | #40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning) | #57 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 888.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #112 (of 130 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #29 (of 130 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #129 (of 130 teams · 34% of plays successful) | #38 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.391 average PPA on successful plays) | #53 (of 130 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Georgia Tech7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #63 (of 130 teams · 408.8 yds/g · 5,314 yards) | #33 (of 130 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points) | #45 (of 130 teams · 369.2 yds/g allowed · 4,800 yards) | #79 (of 130 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 381 points) | #57 (of 130 teams · +4.3 /g · +56 on the season) | #24 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.54 /g) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:27 /g · 7h 15m on the season) | #29 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning) | #110 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning) | #21 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning) | #49 (of 130 teams · 583.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #23 (of 130 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #109 (of 130 teams · 0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #127 (of 130 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #123 (of 130 teams · 1.073 average PPA on successful plays) | #24 (of 130 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Louisville2–10 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #109 (of 130 teams · 352.6 yds/g · 4,231 yards) | #122 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 237 points) | #102 (of 130 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 5,284 yards) | #128 (of 130 teams · 44.1 pts/g allowed · 529 points) | #129 (of 130 teams · -24.3 /g · -292 on the season) | #125 (of 130 teams · -12 on the season · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.00 /g) | #115 (of 130 teams · 27:16 /g · 5h 27m on the season) | #105 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning) | #46 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning) | #126 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's rushing production returning) | #40 (of 130 teams · 632.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #117 (of 130 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #127 (of 130 teams · 0.341 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #102 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #129 (of 130 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #85 (of 130 teams · 1.185 average PPA on successful plays) | #33 (of 130 teams · 1.148 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Miami7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #105 (of 130 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 4,649 yards) | #66 (of 130 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 374 points) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 278.1 yds/g allowed · 3,616 yards) | #18 (of 130 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 253 points) | #35 (of 130 teams · +9.3 /g · +121 on the season) | #72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g) | #83 (of 130 teams · 28:55 /g · 6h 16m on the season) | #33 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning) | #79 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning) | #30 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning) | #20 (of 130 teams · 753.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #88 (of 130 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #110 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #14 (of 130 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays) | #29 (of 130 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | NC State9–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #50 (of 130 teams · 416.2 yds/g · 5,411 yards) | #31 (of 130 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points) | #66 (of 130 teams · 392.6 yds/g allowed · 5,104 yards) | #45 (of 130 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 324 points) | #36 (of 130 teams · +8.9 /g · +116 on the season) | #53 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g) | #36 (of 130 teams · 30:36 /g · 6h 38m on the season) | #24 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #47 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning) | #110 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning) | #41 (of 130 teams · 629.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #39 (of 130 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #82 (of 130 teams · 0.175 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #13 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful) | #67 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #116 (of 130 teams · 1.107 average PPA on successful plays) | #78 (of 130 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | North Carolina2–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #30 (of 130 teams · 442.9 yds/g · 4,872 yards) | #78 (of 130 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 301 points) | #106 (of 130 teams · 447.6 yds/g allowed · 4,924 yards) | #107 (of 130 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 380 points) | #103 (of 130 teams · -7.2 /g · -79 on the season) | #112 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.55 /g) | #95 (of 130 teams · 28:15 /g · 5h 11m on the season) | #53 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning) | #36 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning) | #15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning) | #28 (of 130 teams · 688.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #95 (of 130 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #86 (of 130 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #77 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #85 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #61 (of 130 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays) | #60 (of 130 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Pittsburgh7–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 Syracuse) | #96 (of 130 teams · 371.0 yds/g · 5,194 yards) | #94 (of 130 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 359 points) | #58 (of 130 teams · 387.5 yds/g allowed · 5,425 yards) | #75 (of 130 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 389 points) | #83 (of 130 teams · -2.1 /g · -30 on the season) | #55 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.14 /g) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:26 /g · 7h 48m on the season) | #95 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing production returning) | #82 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning) | #71 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning) | #38 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #58 (of 130 teams · 0.187 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #60 (of 130 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #86 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #72 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #24 (of 130 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays) | #91 (of 130 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Syracuse10–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia) | #19 (of 130 teams · 464.0 yds/g · 6,032 yards) | #11 (of 130 teams · 40.2 pts/g · 523 points) | #88 (of 130 teams · 426.5 yds/g allowed · 5,545 yards) | #64 (of 130 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 351 points) | #19 (of 130 teams · +13.2 /g · +172 on the season) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +13 on the season · 31 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g) | #46 (of 130 teams · 30:17 /g · 6h 34m on the season) | #52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning) | #114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning) | #14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning) | #54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #66 (of 130 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #58 (of 130 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #35 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #56 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #125 (of 130 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays) | #79 (of 130 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Virginia Tech6–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #38 (of 130 teams · 428.1 yds/g · 5,566 yards) | #61 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points) | #99 (of 130 teams · 438.9 yds/g allowed · 5,705 yards) | #85 (of 130 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 403 points) | #78 (of 130 teams · -1.1 /g · -15 on the season) | #53 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g) | #53 (of 130 teams · 30:05 /g · 6h 31m on the season) | #37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning) | #70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning) | #45 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning) | #30 (of 130 teams · 675.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #65 (of 130 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #104 (of 130 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #68 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #54 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #55 (of 130 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays) | #129 (of 130 teams · 1.432 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2018 | Wake Forest7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #27 (of 130 teams · 451.0 yds/g · 5,863 yards) | #35 (of 130 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points) | #117 (of 130 teams · 458.9 yds/g allowed · 5,965 yards) | #102 (of 130 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 433 points) | #74 (of 130 teams · -0.5 /g · -6 on the season) | #89 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.31 /g) | #96 (of 130 teams · 28:13 /g · 6h 07m on the season) | #99 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning) | #67 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning) | #55 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning) | #70 (of 130 teams · 525.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #71 (of 130 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #89 (of 130 teams · 0.196 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #71 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #63 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #105 (of 130 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays) | #110 (of 130 teams · 1.313 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |