THIRD AND DATA

VMI game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29at Idaho State10–38 L612403.952–2295–9–11103–160–213–2034:5925%47%
Sep 5at Virginia Tech3–73 L56831.543–-45–13–8762–170–017–4531:279%64%
Sep 12vs Bucknell3–14 L632594.136–10411–27–155145–151–217–5531:3529%47%
Sep 19at Davidson24–27 L583025.240–1678–18–135165–130–121–526:2334%46%
Sep 26at Samford7–45 L522124.141–1513–11–61123–110–032–2025:2738%61%
Oct 3vs Mercer3–54 L531021.942–614–11–4183–150–004–2028:1517%49%
Oct 17at Wofford14–41 L561883.447–1525–9–36134–132–315–3230:4523%52%
Oct 24vs East Tennessee State0–38 L421433.437–1302–5–1363–120–005–3525:2821%56%
Oct 31at Chattanooga10–24 L552414.443–1178–12–124155–112–312–3032:1035%52%
Season9 games0–94961,7703.6381–110751–115–66310033–1235–111036–2624:26:2926%53%

Success rate

VMI on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game26.0% · 53.0%
25
47
9
64
29
47
34
46
38
61
17
49
23
52
21
56
35
52
@ Idaho State
@ Virginia Tech
Bucknell
@ Davidson
@ Samford
Mercer
@ Wofford
East Tennessee State
@ Chattanooga
@ Tennessee Tech
The Citadel
Furman

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 9.1%, defense allows 63.9%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: VMI on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is VMI's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:VMI offense 26% (128 of 493)Opponent offense / VMI defense 53% (319 of 602)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Idaho State: opponent offense 47% of 64Idaho State: VMI offense 25% of 60Virginia Tech: opponent offense 64% of 72Virginia Tech: VMI offense 9% of 55Bucknell: opponent offense 47% of 55Bucknell: VMI offense 29% of 62Davidson: opponent offense 46% of 76Davidson: VMI offense 34% of 58Samford: opponent offense 61% of 75Samford: VMI offense 38% of 53Mercer: opponent offense 49% of 74Mercer: VMI offense 17% of 52Wofford: opponent offense 52% of 56Wofford: VMI offense 23% of 56East Tennessee State: opponent offense 56% of 78East Tennessee State: VMI offense 21% of 42Chattanooga: opponent offense 52% of 52Chattanooga: VMI offense 35% of 55
@ Idaho State@ Virginia TechBucknell@ Davidson@ SamfordMercer@ WoffordEast Tennessee State@ Chattanooga@ Tennessee TechThe CitadelFurman
VMI offenseOpponent offense (VMI defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Idaho State

10–38 L · 60 plays to 64
VMI offense 25% (15/60)Idaho State offense 47% (30/64)

at Virginia Tech

3–73 L · 55 plays to 72
VMI offense 9% (5/55)Virginia Tech offense 64% (46/72)

vs Bucknell

3–14 L · 62 plays to 55
VMI offense 29% (18/62)Bucknell offense 47% (26/55)

at Davidson

24–27 L · 58 plays to 76
VMI offense 34% (20/58)Davidson offense 46% (35/76)

at Samford

7–45 L · 53 plays to 75
VMI offense 38% (20/53)Samford offense 61% (46/75)

vs Mercer

3–54 L · 52 plays to 74
VMI offense 17% (9/52)Mercer offense 49% (36/74)

at Wofford

14–41 L · 56 plays to 56
VMI offense 23% (13/56)Wofford offense 52% (29/56)

vs East Tennessee State

0–38 L · 42 plays to 78
VMI offense 21% (9/42)East Tenn. St. offense 56% (44/78)

at Chattanooga

10–24 L · 55 plays to 52
VMI offense 35% (19/55)Chattanooga offense 52% (27/52)