THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Wake ForestDemon Deacons

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Wake Forest played 10 such games.

ACC, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Wake Forest3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 307.0 yds/g · 3,070 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 15.1 pts/g · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 397.4 yds/g allowed · 3,974 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -12.7 /g · -127 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 497.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#38 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #8–#75. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #5–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #3–#61. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #3–#58. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #3–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #7–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #6–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#47 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #7–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#77 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #12–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #4–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#58. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #5–#74. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#68. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #6–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #5–#74. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2015North Carolina11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 4,917 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 401 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 416.3 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +18.0 /g · +180 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 25:23 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.353 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.375 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.116 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Clemson14–11 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 510.5 yds/g · 5,105 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 295.2 yds/g allowed · 2,952 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 206 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +15.9 /g · +159 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.280 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 1.257 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.577 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#32 (of 75 teams · 399.3 yds/g · 3,594 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 342.8 yds/g allowed · 3,085 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 146 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · +10.8 /g · +97 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 10 taken, 8 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 75 teams · 391.8 yds/g · 3,918 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 321.8 yds/g allowed · 3,218 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · +1.5 /g · +15 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 29:20 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 75 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Miami8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 75 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 3,485 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 440.8 yds/g allowed · 3,967 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 292 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · -6.3 /g · -57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29:14 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 773.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 75 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.129 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 75 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,029 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 219 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 395.9 yds/g allowed · 3,167 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 237 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · -2.3 /g · -18 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 30:04 /g · 4h 01m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 610.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 75 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 75 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 3,950 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 412.0 yds/g allowed · 4,120 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -4.1 /g · -41 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:32 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 667.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 75 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 1.370 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 75 teams · 338.6 yds/g · 3,386 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · +2.6 /g · +26 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 31:47 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 658.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 75 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.441 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Boston College3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 237.7 yds/g · 2,139 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 89 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 2,797 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · -8.6 /g · -77 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 534.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 28% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.280 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 75 teams · 392.6 yds/g · 3,533 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 426.6 yds/g allowed · 3,839 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:04 /g · 4h 04m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 75 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 0.177 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 1.326 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Georgia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)#58 (of 75 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 3,896 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -7.6 /g · -76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 31:10 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 590.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 75 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.252 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 75 teams · 380.7 yds/g · 3,807 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 361.9 yds/g allowed · 3,619 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +1.9 /g · +19 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 32:43 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 611.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 75 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.432 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 309.1 yds/g · 2,782 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 459.8 yds/g allowed · 4,138 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -8.2 /g · -74 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 508.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 75 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20152015 Wake ForestACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #38
Total offense. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Clemson #8 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #10 of 75; 2015 Florida State #32 of 75; 2015 Virginia #33 of 75; 2015 Duke #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #36 of 75; 2015 Miami #38 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 75; 2015 NC State #44 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #58 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #59 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 75; 2015 Boston College #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 67 of 75. ACC median rank 38.
Scoring offensemedian #35
Scoring offense. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 75; 2015 NC State #33 of 75; 2015 Florida State #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #35 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #35 of 75; 2015 Miami #39 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #43 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Boston College #73 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 68 of 75. ACC median rank 35.
Total defensemedian #30
Total defense. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Boston College #6 of 75; 2015 Louisville #8 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #21 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 Virginia #42 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #48 of 75; 2015 Duke #51 of 75; 2015 Miami #54 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #61 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 36 of 75. ACC median rank 30.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Florida State #3 of 75; 2015 Boston College #7 of 75; 2015 Clemson #13 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #18 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Louisville #27 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #46 of 75; 2015 NC State #48 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 35 of 75. ACC median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #41
Point margin. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #3 of 75; 2015 Clemson #4 of 75; 2015 Florida State #11 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #30 of 75; 2015 Louisville #32 of 75; 2015 NC State #41 of 75; 2015 Virginia #43 of 75; 2015 Duke #45 of 75; 2015 Miami #49 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #51 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 75; 2015 Boston College #55 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 66 of 75. ACC median rank 41.
Turnover marginmedian #30
Turnover margin. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 NC State #7 of 75; 2015 Miami #9 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #13 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #21 of 75; 2015 Florida State #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 Boston College #39 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 Virginia #45 of 75; 2015 Clemson #51 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #65 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 65 of 75. ACC median rank 30.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Virginia #6 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #12 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #17 of 75; 2015 Clemson #18 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #42 of 75; 2015 Florida State #43 of 75; 2015 Miami #44 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #50 of 75; 2015 Boston College #52 of 75; 2015 Duke #68 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #72 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 28 of 75. ACC median rank 35.
Returning passingmedian #47
Returning passing. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #39 of 128; 2015 NC State #40 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #43 of 128; 2015 Louisville #44 of 128; 2015 Miami #47 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 128; 2015 Virginia #81 of 128; 2015 Clemson #84 of 128; 2015 Florida State #103 of 128; 2015 Duke #116 of 128; 2015 Boston College #118 of 128. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 47 of 128. ACC median rank 47.
Returning receivingmedian #77
Returning receiving. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 128; 2015 Miami #66 of 128; 2015 Florida State #69 of 128; 2015 Virginia #77 of 128; 2015 NC State #85 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #91 of 128; 2015 Duke #96 of 128; 2015 Boston College #108 of 128; 2015 Louisville #116 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 93 of 128. ACC median rank 77.
Returning rushingmedian #56
Returning rushing. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #7 of 128; 2015 Miami #12 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 128; 2015 NC State #39 of 128; 2015 Clemson #52 of 128; 2015 Boston College #59 of 128; 2015 Duke #70 of 128; 2015 Florida State #85 of 128; 2015 Louisville #89 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #97 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #115 of 128; 2015 Virginia #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 56 of 128. ACC median rank 56.
Team talentmedian #36
Team talent. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Florida State #4 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Miami #17 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #26 of 128; 2015 Virginia #30 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 128; 2015 Louisville #36 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 128; 2015 NC State #43 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 128; 2015 Duke #53 of 128; 2015 Boston College #58 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 128. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 69 of 128. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 Florida State #21 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia #29 of 75; 2015 Miami #36 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 NC State #49 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Duke #60 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 70 of 75. ACC median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Boston College #1 of 75; 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Louisville #22 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 NC State #30 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #34 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 75; 2015 Virginia #51 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 44 of 75. ACC median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #50
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Clemson #12 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Virginia #31 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #41 of 75; 2015 Duke #50 of 75; 2015 Louisville #51 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Miami #57 of 75; 2015 NC State #59 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 70 of 75. ACC median rank 50.
Defensive success ratemedian #28
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Clemson #1 of 75; 2015 Boston College #2 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #10 of 75; 2015 Louisville #13 of 75; 2015 Florida State #17 of 75; 2015 NC State #26 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #28 of 75; 2015 Duke #34 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #54 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #64 of 75; 2015 Miami #68 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 36 of 75. ACC median rank 28.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #28
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Louisville #6 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #8 of 75; 2015 NC State #12 of 75; 2015 Miami #13 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 Boston College #28 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #30 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Clemson #41 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #42 of 75; 2015 Duke #47 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #58 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #66 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 21 of 75. ACC median rank 28.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #55
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Miami #7 of 75; 2015 Florida State #20 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #29 of 75; 2015 Duke #55 of 75; 2015 Louisville #61 of 75; 2015 NC State #63 of 75; 2015 Virginia #65 of 75; 2015 Boston College #67 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #70 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #71 of 75; 2015 Clemson #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Wake Forest, ranked 48 of 75. ACC median rank 55.