| 2016 | Wake Forest7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple) | #124 (of 128 teams · 311.5 yds/g · 4,049 yards) | #118 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 265 points) | #40 (of 128 teams · 370.5 yds/g allowed · 4,817 yards) | #23 (of 128 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points) | #81 (of 128 teams · -1.8 /g · -23 on the season) | #19 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.62 /g) | #50 (of 128 teams · 30:49 /g · 6h 41m on the season) | #12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning) | #67 (of 128 teams · 517.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #124 (of 128 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #30 (of 128 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #123 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful) | #43 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #100 (of 128 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays) | #42 (of 128 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2016 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #45 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #44 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #6–#118. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #24 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#122. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #39 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #10–#120. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #48 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #6–#116. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #58 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #14–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #54 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #9–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #25 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #34 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#108. 4 of 14 in the top 10.) | #39 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#80. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #4–#67. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #33 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #30 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #6–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #54 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #7–#128. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #26 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#115. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #56 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #83 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2016 | Boston College7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #127 (of 128 teams · 292.9 yds/g · 3,807 yards) | #118 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 265 points) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 314.1 yds/g allowed · 4,084 yards) | #44 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points) | #91 (of 128 teams · -4.6 /g · -60 on the season) | #24 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 27 taken, 20 given · +0.54 /g) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season) | #19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #49 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning) | #39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning) | #60 (of 128 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #127 (of 128 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #17 (of 128 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #128 (of 128 teams · 34% of plays successful) | #4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #92 (of 128 teams · 1.158 average PPA on successful plays) | #126 (of 128 teams · 1.423 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Clemson14–1 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State) | 4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State) | #12 (of 128 teams · 503.7 yds/g · 7,555 yards) | #14 (of 128 teams · 39.2 pts/g · 588 points) | #8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 311.5 yds/g allowed · 4,672 yards) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 270 points) | #6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.2 /g · +318 on the season) | #71 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.07 /g) | #54 (of 128 teams · 30:36 /g · 7h 39m on the season) | #25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning) | #26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing production returning) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #33 (of 128 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #107 (of 128 teams · 1.114 average PPA on successful plays) | #63 (of 128 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Duke4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #96 (of 128 teams · 377.6 yds/g · 4,531 yards) | #110 (of 128 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 280 points) | #59 (of 128 teams · 396.8 yds/g allowed · 4,762 yards) | #66 (of 128 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 338 points) | #92 (of 128 teams · -4.8 /g · -58 on the season) | #105 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.50 /g) | #89 (of 128 teams · 28:40 /g · 5h 44m on the season) | #36 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #103 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning) | #52 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing production returning) | #48 (of 128 teams · 599.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #83 (of 128 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #85 (of 128 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #54 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #53 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #108 (of 128 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays) | #113 (of 128 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Florida State10–3 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan) | #25 (of 128 teams · 466.4 yds/g · 6,063 yards) | #31 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 456 points) | #22 (of 128 teams · 349.1 yds/g allowed · 4,538 yards) | #44 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points) | #30 (of 128 teams · +10.1 /g · +131 on the season) | #42 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.23 /g) | #15 (of 128 teams · 32:55 /g · 7h 08m on the season) | #82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing production returning) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving production returning) | #39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning) | #4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #19 (of 128 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #36 (of 128 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #15 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful) | #22 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #56 (of 128 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays) | #111 (of 128 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Georgia Tech9–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech) | #84 (of 128 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 5,034 yards) | #70 (of 128 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points) | #60 (of 128 teams · 401.6 yds/g allowed · 5,221 yards) | #39 (of 128 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points) | #55 (of 128 teams · +3.8 /g · +49 on the season) | #38 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.31 /g) | #57 (of 128 teams · 30:17 /g · 6h 34m on the season) | #22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving production returning) | #47 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning) | #50 (of 128 teams · 582.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #32 (of 128 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #98 (of 128 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #58 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #115 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #35 (of 128 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays) | #22 (of 128 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Louisville9–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 532.7 yds/g · 6,925 yards) | #6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.5 pts/g · 553 points) | #14 (of 128 teams · 322.2 yds/g allowed · 4,189 yards) | #31 (of 128 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points) | #8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18.8 /g · +244 on the season) | #107 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 25 taken, 32 given · -0.54 /g) | #87 (of 128 teams · 28:47 /g · 6h 14m on the season) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving production returning) | #12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning) | #32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #20 (of 128 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays) | #106 (of 128 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Miami9–4 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #16 West Virginia) | #57 (of 128 teams · 425.9 yds/g · 5,537 yards) | #37 (of 128 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points) | #20 (of 128 teams · 345.5 yds/g allowed · 4,492 yards) | #12 (of 128 teams · 18.5 pts/g allowed · 241 points) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +15.8 /g · +205 on the season) | #14 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.69 /g) | #100 (of 128 teams · 27:59 /g · 6h 04m on the season) | #25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #71 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) | #19 (of 128 teams · 745.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #29 (of 128 teams · 0.225 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #19 (of 128 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #63 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #26 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #28 (of 128 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays) | #76 (of 128 teams · 1.208 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | NC State7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #63 (of 128 teams · 416.4 yds/g · 5,413 yards) | #75 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 351 points) | #24 (of 128 teams · 352.8 yds/g allowed · 4,586 yards) | #27 (of 128 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 296 points) | #52 (of 128 teams · +4.2 /g · +55 on the season) | #49 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.15 /g) | #29 (of 128 teams · 31:51 /g · 6h 54m on the season) | #112 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning) | #5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving production returning) | #58 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning) | #44 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 128 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #23 (of 128 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #75 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #23 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #57 (of 128 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays) | #83 (of 128 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | North Carolina8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State, #23 Pittsburgh) | #45 (of 128 teams · 439.0 yds/g · 5,707 yards) | #44 (of 128 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 420 points) | #65 (of 128 teams · 408.4 yds/g allowed · 5,309 yards) | #43 (of 128 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 324 points) | #39 (of 128 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season) | #79 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.15 /g) | #127 (of 128 teams · 24:23 /g · 5h 17m on the season) | #97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning) | #60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning) | #80 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning) | #29 (of 128 teams · 669.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #14 (of 128 teams · 0.275 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #71 (of 128 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #39 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #105 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.035 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Pittsburgh8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State) | #38 (of 128 teams · 446.8 yds/g · 5,808 yards) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.9 pts/g · 532 points) | #101 (of 128 teams · 452.8 yds/g allowed · 5,886 yards) | #106 (of 128 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 458 points) | #48 (of 128 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season) | #58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g) | #49 (of 128 teams · 30:53 /g · 6h 42m on the season) | #50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning) | #108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning) | #50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning) | #35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #13 (of 128 teams · 0.296 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #89 (of 128 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #42 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #57 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.367 average PPA on successful plays) | #120 (of 128 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Syracuse4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech) | #42 (of 128 teams · 440.8 yds/g · 5,290 yards) | #90 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 308 points) | #122 (of 128 teams · 501.1 yds/g allowed · 6,013 yards) | #120 (of 128 teams · 38.6 pts/g allowed · 463 points) | #116 (of 128 teams · -12.9 /g · -155 on the season) | #76 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g) | #88 (of 128 teams · 28:41 /g · 5h 44m on the season) | #34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #18 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning) | #34 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning) | #66 (of 128 teams · 520.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #91 (of 128 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #113 (of 128 teams · 0.246 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #111 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #97 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #30 (of 128 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays) | #119 (of 128 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Virginia2–10 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #112 (of 128 teams · 352.9 yds/g · 4,235 yards) | #115 (of 128 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 270 points) | #93 (of 128 teams · 446.6 yds/g allowed · 5,359 yards) | #99 (of 128 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points) | #112 (of 128 teams · -11.3 /g · -135 on the season) | #117 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 17 taken, 26 given · -0.75 /g) | #79 (of 128 teams · 29:00 /g · 5h 48m on the season) | #12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #65 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) | #42 (of 128 teams · 618.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #121 (of 128 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #106 (of 128 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #94 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #83 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #96 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays) | #99 (of 128 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2016 | Virginia Tech10–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh) | #39 (of 128 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 6,229 yards) | #33 (of 128 teams · 35.0 pts/g · 490 points) | #18 (of 128 teams · 340.7 yds/g allowed · 4,770 yards) | #28 (of 128 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 319 points) | #19 (of 128 teams · +12.2 /g · +171 on the season) | #72 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.07 /g) | #36 (of 128 teams · 31:15 /g · 7h 18m on the season) | #85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing production returning) | #20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving production returning) | #54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning) | #36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #66 (of 128 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #24 (of 128 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #33 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #18 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #121 (of 128 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays) | #74 (of 128 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |