THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Washington StateCougars

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-10

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Pac-10, 2010

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Washington State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 330.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds)#106 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 467.0 yds/g allowed · 5,604 yds)#110 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -16.3 /g · -195 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#78 (of 120 teams · 18:07 /g · 3h 37m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#95 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.082 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#29 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#100. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#53 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#106. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#57 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #18–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #10–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #7–#112. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#116. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#49 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #9–#94. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #5–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #7–#95. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #19–#114. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #1–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range #26–#97. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2010Stanford12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 472.5 yds/g · 6,142 yds)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 40.3 pts/g · 524 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.9 /g · +298 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 30 taken, 17 given · +1.00 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 21:04 /g · 4h 34m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#67 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.921 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oregon12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 530.4 yds/g · 6,895 yds)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47.0 pts/g · 611 points)#34 (of 120 teams · 346.0 yds/g allowed · 4,498 yds)#12 (of 120 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +28.3 /g · +368 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 37 taken, 24 given · +1.00 /g)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:59 /g · 3h 41m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#20 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#19 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Arizona7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 439.4 yds/g · 5,712 yds)#53 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#33 (of 120 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 4,431 yds)#41 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#45 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +72 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#75 (of 120 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#22 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010California5–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 120 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,008 yds)#73 (of 120 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#18 (of 120 teams · 318.8 yds/g allowed · 3,825 yds)#40 (of 120 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.3 /g · +39 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.17 /g)#51 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 3h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#83 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#27 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.925 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.929 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010USC8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 120 teams · 431.5 yds/g · 5,609 yds)#37 (of 120 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#84 (of 120 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 5,203 yds)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#51 (of 120 teams · +4.3 /g · +56 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#11 (of 120 teams · 20:07 /g · 4h 22m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#27 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#100 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Washington7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 120 teams · 362.7 yds/g · 4,715 yds)#96 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 284 points)#70 (of 120 teams · 384.9 yds/g allowed · 5,003 yds)#80 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#92 (of 120 teams · -7.5 /g · -97 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:40 /g · 4h 03m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#87 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.975 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Arizona State6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 425.7 yds/g · 5,108 yds)#28 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 387 points)#57 (of 120 teams · 365.5 yds/g allowed · 4,386 yds)#55 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +7.3 /g · +87 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.42 /g)#116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:31 /g · 3h 18m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#44 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#36 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oregon State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 120 teams · 326.5 yds/g · 3,918 yds)#82 (of 120 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#86 (of 120 teams · 407.9 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yds)#64 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 322 points)#79 (of 120 teams · -2.4 /g · -29 on the season)#36 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.33 /g)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:59 /g · 3h 24m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#82 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#94 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UCLA4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2010. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 120 teams · 316.7 yds/g · 3,800 yds)#104 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 242 points)#94 (of 120 teams · 420.1 yds/g allowed · 5,041 yds)#86 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 364 points)#98 (of 120 teams · -10.2 /g · -122 on the season)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 18 taken, 29 given · -0.92 /g)#77 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#75 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#81 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.827 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20102010 Washington StatePac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #29
Total offense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #1 of 120; 2010 Stanford #14 of 120; 2010 Arizona #24 of 120; 2010 USC #26 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #29 of 120; 2010 Washington #76 of 120; 2010 California #90 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #94 of 120; 2010 UCLA #100 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 92 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 29.
Scoring offensemedian #53
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #1 of 120; 2010 Stanford #9 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2010 USC #37 of 120; 2010 Arizona #53 of 120; 2010 California #73 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 Washington #96 of 120; 2010 UCLA #104 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 106 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 53.
Total defensemedian #57
Total defense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 California #18 of 120; 2010 Stanford #22 of 120; 2010 Arizona #33 of 120; 2010 Oregon #34 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #57 of 120; 2010 Washington #70 of 120; 2010 USC #84 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #86 of 120; 2010 UCLA #94 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 118 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 57.
Scoring defensemedian #55
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #10 of 120; 2010 Oregon #12 of 120; 2010 California #40 of 120; 2010 Arizona #41 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #55 of 120; 2010 USC #63 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #64 of 120; 2010 Washington #80 of 120; 2010 UCLA #86 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 110 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 55.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #3 of 120; 2010 Stanford #5 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #38 of 120; 2010 Arizona #45 of 120; 2010 USC #51 of 120; 2010 California #55 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #79 of 120; 2010 Washington #92 of 120; 2010 UCLA #98 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 111 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #7 of 120; 2010 Stanford #7 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #36 of 120; 2010 USC #38 of 120; 2010 California #45 of 120; 2010 Washington #47 of 120; 2010 Arizona #74 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #84 of 120; 2010 UCLA #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 64 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #75
Possession. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #1 of 120; 2010 USC #11 of 120; 2010 California #51 of 120; 2010 Washington #63 of 120; 2010 Arizona #75 of 120; 2010 UCLA #77 of 120; 2010 Oregon #111 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #112 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 78 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 75.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #49
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #9 of 120; 2010 Arizona #18 of 120; 2010 Oregon #21 of 120; 2010 USC #28 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #49 of 120; 2010 Washington #64 of 120; 2010 California #80 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 UCLA #94 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 84 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 49.
Defensive EPAmedian #49
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #5 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #13 of 120; 2010 Stanford #44 of 120; 2010 Arizona #47 of 120; 2010 California #49 of 120; 2010 UCLA #85 of 120; 2010 Washington #90 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #98 of 120; 2010 USC #106 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 120 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 49.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Stanford #7 of 120; 2010 Oregon #20 of 120; 2010 Arizona #22 of 120; 2010 USC #27 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #44 of 120; 2010 UCLA #75 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #82 of 120; 2010 California #83 of 120; 2010 Washington #86 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 95 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #67
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oregon #19 of 120; 2010 Arizona #26 of 120; 2010 California #27 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #36 of 120; 2010 Stanford #67 of 120; 2010 UCLA #81 of 120; 2010 Washington #87 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #94 of 120; 2010 USC #100 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 114 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 67.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Washington #19 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #22 of 120; 2010 Arizona #28 of 120; 2010 Oregon #41 of 120; 2010 USC #45 of 120; 2010 California #57 of 120; 2010 Arizona State #70 of 120; 2010 Stanford #91 of 120; 2010 UCLA #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 1 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Arizona State #26 of 120; 2010 Oregon #51 of 120; 2010 Washington #54 of 120; 2010 Stanford #58 of 120; 2010 California #62 of 120; 2010 UCLA #67 of 120; 2010 Oregon State #71 of 120; 2010 USC #83 of 120; 2010 Arizona #97 of 120. Marked: 2010 Washington State, ranked 85 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 62.