THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Washington StateCougars

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2016, released in week 15.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Washington State played 9 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Washington State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford)#12 (of 71 teams · 491.9 yds/g · 4,427 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.8 pts/g · 358 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 3,715 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.7 /g · +114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 32:09 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 522.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#18 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#60. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#50. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#31. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#45. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #3–#59. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#125. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #2–#127. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#57. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 10 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#48. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#52. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #3–#69. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #4–#71. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC · postseason: #4 Washington)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC, #14 Auburn, #17 Florida, #20 LSU, #21 Tennessee · postseason: #4 Washington)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 494.0 yds/g · 4,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 356 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 263.6 yds/g allowed · 2,372 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.8 pts/g allowed · 124 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +25.8 /g · +232 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 31:59 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 982.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.290 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.369 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado, #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 493.1 yds/g · 4,931 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 344.3 yds/g allowed · 3,443 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.0 /g · +240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13 in these games · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31:21 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.380 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #12 Oklahoma State, #16 West Virginia · postseason: #14 Auburn)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 565.5 yds/g · 5,655 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.4 pts/g · 454 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,517 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:04 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 777.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016LSU8–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Louisville)#31 (of 71 teams · 428.1 yds/g · 3,853 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 232 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 327.0 yds/g allowed · 2,943 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +75 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 32:07 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 917.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 71 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Colorado)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #16 West Virginia, #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #10 Colorado)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 517.0 yds/g · 5,170 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 376 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 486.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · +7.6 /g · +76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 28:43 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 631.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 0.218 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Colorado10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#23 (of 71 teams · 446.4 yds/g · 4,464 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 3,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · +10.6 /g · +106 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 31:17 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 526.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 71 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016USC10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)#14 (of 71 teams · 473.2 yds/g · 5,205 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 350 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +91 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 49m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 936.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 71 teams · 0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.259 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Auburn8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#48 (of 71 teams · 377.7 yds/g · 3,399 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 3,474 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 71 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Western Michigan13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (426.5 yds/g · 853 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g · 56 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (317.0 yds/g allowed · 634 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.5 pts/g allowed · 31 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+12.5 /g · +25 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37:02 /g · 1h 14m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 443.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.120 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016West Virginia10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 497.8 yds/g · 4,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 424.8 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 228 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · +9.0 /g · +90 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 654.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 71 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida9–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#60 (of 71 teams · 338.4 yds/g · 3,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 209 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 330.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +6.1 /g · +55 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 798.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Stanford10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#54 (of 71 teams · 359.6 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 276 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 4,096 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · +4.6 /g · +51 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 32:51 /g · 6h 01m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 778.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 71 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#30 (of 71 teams · 430.4 yds/g · 3,874 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 284 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 427.1 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +3.7 /g · +33 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:02 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 580.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 71 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)— (324.0 yds/g · 324 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (403.0 yds/g allowed · 403 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-7.0 /g · -7 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:27 /g · 0h 31m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 492.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.528 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.484 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida, #22 Virginia Tech)#21 (of 71 teams · 450.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 520.9 yds/g allowed · 4,688 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · +1.4 /g · +13 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 27:46 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 813.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 71 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.374 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Navy9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (368.0 yds/g · 368 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (370.0 yds/g allowed · 370 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g allowed · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1.0 /g · +1 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 0 taken, 0 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:53 /g · 0h 34m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 342.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.424 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.373 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20162016 Washington StateCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #18
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #8 of 71; 2016 Alabama #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #21 of 71; 2016 Colorado #23 of 71; 2016 Penn State #26 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Utah #30 of 71; 2016 LSU #31 of 71; 2016 Auburn #48 of 71; 2016 Stanford #54 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Florida #60 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 12 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Scoring offensemedian #13
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Alabama #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #11 of 71; 2016 Penn State #12 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #13 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 USC #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Colorado #21 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #23 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 LSU #39 of 71; 2016 Stanford #43 of 71; 2016 Auburn #45 of 71; 2016 Florida #50 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 5 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Total defensemedian #15
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Alabama #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Florida #8 of 71; 2016 Louisville #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Washington #11 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Colorado #17 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Stanford #21 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 71; 2016 Utah #42 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #59 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 34 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Scoring defensemedian #13
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Alabama #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Auburn #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #13 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Louisville #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Penn State #20 of 71; 2016 USC #24 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Utah #35 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #41 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #43 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #56 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 34 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Point marginmedian #12
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #7 of 71; 2016 Penn State #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #12 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #13 of 71; 2016 LSU #15 of 71; 2016 USC #16 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Auburn #20 of 71; 2016 Florida #21 of 71; 2016 Stanford #23 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 Utah #26 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #31 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 10 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Turnover marginmedian #24
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Utah #5 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #10 of 71; 2016 Penn State #14 of 71; 2016 Florida #18 of 71; 2016 Auburn #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #24 of 71; 2016 LSU #28 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #33 of 71; 2016 Stanford #35 of 71; 2016 Alabama #36 of 71; 2016 Louisville #36 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #36 of 71; 2016 USC #40 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 22 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 24.
Possessionmedian #20
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #9 of 71; 2016 Utah #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 LSU #16 of 71; 2016 Alabama #17 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Washington #25 of 71; 2016 Colorado #26 of 71; 2016 Florida #39 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #44 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Louisville #49 of 71; 2016 Penn State #51 of 71; 2016 Auburn #56 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #59 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 15 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Returning passingmedian #67
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Auburn #1 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #1 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #1 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Washington #30 of 128; 2016 LSU #30 of 128; 2016 Temple #34 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #51 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #58 of 128; 2016 Colorado #67 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Alabama #101 of 128; 2016 Penn State #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Stanford #109 of 128; 2016 USC #114 of 128; 2016 Navy #115 of 128; 2016 Florida #121 of 128; 2016 Utah #122 of 128. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 55 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 67.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 USC #11 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 LSU #23 of 128; 2016 Penn State #28 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #51 of 128; 2016 Alabama #54 of 128; 2016 Navy #55 of 128; 2016 Colorado #58 of 128; 2016 Stanford #66 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #80 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Utah #88 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Florida #101 of 128; 2016 Temple #104 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128; 2016 Auburn #110 of 128; 2016 Washington #111 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 38 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #51
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #2 of 128; 2016 Louisville #12 of 128; 2016 Temple #13 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #23 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Washington #43 of 128; 2016 Penn State #49 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 USC #51 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Stanford #77 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #94 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128; 2016 Auburn #122 of 128; 2016 Utah #123 of 128; 2016 Florida #124 of 128; 2016 Navy #126 of 128; 2016 Alabama #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 5 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Team talentmedian #20
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 128; 2016 USC #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #3 of 128; 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Auburn #7 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2016 Florida #16 of 128; 2016 Stanford #17 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2016 Penn State #20 of 128; 2016 Washington #24 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #31 of 128; 2016 Louisville #32 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #39 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Colorado #62 of 128; 2016 Temple #71 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #81 of 128; 2016 Navy #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 65 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Offensive EPAmedian #16
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Washington #2 of 71; 2016 Louisville #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #5 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 LSU #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #32 of 71; 2016 Utah #37 of 71; 2016 Stanford #38 of 71; 2016 Auburn #39 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Florida #57 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 7 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Defensive EPAmedian #16
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Louisville #7 of 71; 2016 Colorado #8 of 71; 2016 LSU #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Auburn #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #21 of 71; 2016 Penn State #22 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 USC #25 of 71; 2016 Stanford #41 of 71; 2016 Utah #44 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 38 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Offensive success ratemedian #14
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 USC #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #12 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 LSU #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #29 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Penn State #34 of 71; 2016 Stanford #36 of 71; 2016 Auburn #38 of 71; 2016 Florida #48 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 5 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Defensive success ratemedian #12
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #6 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Florida #11 of 71; 2016 Washington #12 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 USC #17 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #27 of 71; 2016 Utah #29 of 71; 2016 Stanford #31 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #34 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #49 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 38 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Penn State #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #6 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #13 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 71; 2016 Washington #34 of 71; 2016 Alabama #38 of 71; 2016 Stanford #42 of 71; 2016 USC #43 of 71; 2016 Colorado #52 of 71; 2016 Florida #53 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Utah #55 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Auburn #61 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 46 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #42
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #14 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #25 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Washington #30 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Florida #38 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Colorado #44 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #46 of 71; 2016 Stanford #47 of 71; 2016 Penn State #48 of 71; 2016 USC #56 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #59 of 71; 2016 Alabama #60 of 71; 2016 Utah #61 of 71; 2016 Louisville #62 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Washington State, ranked 49 of 71. CFP Top 25 median rank 42.