THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

WisconsinBadgers

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Wisconsin played 9 such games.

Big Ten, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Wisconsin13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #10 Miami)#34 (of 70 teams · 397.7 yds/g · 3,579 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 288 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 233.2 yds/g allowed · 2,099 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 12.7 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +19.3 /g · +174 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:32 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 639.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 70 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#22 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#53. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#66. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#60. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#62. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #21–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#85 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #29–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#65. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#69. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #14–#69. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#63. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)
2017Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State · postseason: #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State, #16 Michigan State · postseason: #8 USC)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 5,108 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 433 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 296.0 yds/g allowed · 2,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +22.3 /g · +223 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 959.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Penn State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #11 Washington)#20 (of 70 teams · 434.4 yds/g · 4,344 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 347.3 yds/g allowed · 3,473 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +20.5 /g · +205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 30:47 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 779.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)#56 (of 70 teams · 338.5 yds/g · 3,385 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 372.6 yds/g allowed · 3,726 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +6.3 /g · +63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 29:30 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 593.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 70 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 70 teams · 348.6 yds/g · 3,486 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 279.1 yds/g allowed · 2,791 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 874.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.395 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Penn State · postseason: #18 Washington State)#49 (of 70 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 3,618 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 316.6 yds/g allowed · 3,166 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · -0.5 /g · -5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35:09 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Michigan State)#46 (of 70 teams · 367.6 yds/g · 3,676 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · +6.5 /g · +65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 627.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 70 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.127 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Purdue7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 70 teams · 375.2 yds/g · 4,127 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 246 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 502.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 70 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 3,804 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 243 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 357.2 yds/g allowed · 3,572 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · -4.4 /g · -44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 28:24 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 547.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Minnesota5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 3,668 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -5.0 /g · -50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 70 teams · 377.3 yds/g · 3,773 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 452.4 yds/g allowed · 4,524 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 380 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · -13.1 /g · -131 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 9 taken, 16 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 693.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 70 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.362 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Illinois2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 277.2 yds/g · 2,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.1 pts/g · 118 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -20.6 /g · -185 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 16m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 538.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 314.9 yds/g · 3,149 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 429.6 yds/g allowed · 4,296 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.4 /g · -174 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 696.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 70 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 234.8 yds/g · 2,348 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 138 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 4,264 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.6 /g · -186 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20172017 WisconsinBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #20 of 70; 2017 Indiana #40 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #42 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #46 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #49 of 70; 2017 Michigan #52 of 70; 2017 Iowa #56 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #67 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 34 of 70. Big Ten median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #44
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Iowa #25 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #31 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #41 of 70; 2017 Michigan #44 of 70; 2017 Indiana #45 of 70; 2017 Purdue #53 of 70; 2017 Maryland #55 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #57 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #57 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #67 of 70; 2017 Illinois #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 15 of 70. Big Ten median rank 44.
Total defensemedian #22
Total defense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan #4 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #6 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #8 of 70; 2017 Penn State #16 of 70; 2017 Indiana #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #24 of 70; 2017 Purdue #25 of 70; 2017 Iowa #28 of 70; 2017 Illinois #38 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #43 of 70; 2017 Maryland #45 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 1 of 70. Big Ten median rank 22.
Scoring defensemedian #17
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan #12 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #13 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #14 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #20 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #29 of 70; 2017 Indiana #36 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #49 of 70; 2017 Illinois #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #62 of 70; 2017 Maryland #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 2 of 70. Big Ten median rank 17.
Point marginmedian #23
Point margin. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #18 of 70; 2017 Michigan #22 of 70; 2017 Purdue #23 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #37 of 70; 2017 Indiana #44 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #46 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #58 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 5 of 70. Big Ten median rank 23.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Iowa #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #10 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #15 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #23 of 70; 2017 Maryland #25 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Michigan #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #43 of 70; 2017 Indiana #53 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 33 of 70. Big Ten median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan State #1 of 70; 2017 Michigan #11 of 70; 2017 Penn State #26 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #35 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #40 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa #44 of 70; 2017 Illinois #54 of 70; 2017 Purdue #55 of 70; 2017 Indiana #56 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #60 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 3 of 70. Big Ten median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #79
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #21 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 130; 2017 Purdue #32 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #34 of 130; 2017 Michigan #40 of 130; 2017 Indiana #44 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #81 of 130; 2017 Illinois #91 of 130; 2017 Maryland #95 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #96 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #108 of 130; 2017 Iowa #112 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #118 of 130. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 79 of 130. Big Ten median rank 79.
Returning receivingmedian #85
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #29 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #58 of 130; 2017 Illinois #67 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #71 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #77 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #85 of 130; 2017 Indiana #86 of 130; 2017 Purdue #98 of 130; 2017 Maryland #105 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #110 of 130; 2017 Iowa #115 of 130; 2017 Michigan #119 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 47 of 130. Big Ten median rank 85.
Returning rushingmedian #49
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #4 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #5 of 130; 2017 Purdue #19 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #38 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #39 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #41 of 130; 2017 Illinois #49 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #71 of 130; 2017 Michigan #75 of 130; 2017 Maryland #77 of 130; 2017 Iowa #100 of 130; 2017 Indiana #101 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #108 of 130. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 113 of 130. Big Ten median rank 49.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2017 Michigan #7 of 130; 2017 Penn State #19 of 130; 2017 Maryland #28 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #29 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #30 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2017 Iowa #49 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 130; 2017 Indiana #61 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #62 of 130; 2017 Illinois #64 of 130; 2017 Purdue #70 of 130. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 37 of 130. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #49
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Iowa #33 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Michigan #46 of 70; 2017 Indiana #49 of 70; 2017 Purdue #50 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #54 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #56 of 70; 2017 Maryland #59 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 21 of 70. Big Ten median rank 49.
Defensive EPAmedian #20
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan #6 of 70; 2017 Iowa #8 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #9 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #11 of 70; 2017 Penn State #17 of 70; 2017 Purdue #20 of 70; 2017 Indiana #24 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #25 of 70; 2017 Illinois #41 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #47 of 70; 2017 Maryland #60 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 1 of 70. Big Ten median rank 20.
Offensive success ratemedian #46
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #1 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #36 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #46 of 70; 2017 Iowa #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan #54 of 70; 2017 Indiana #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 15 of 70. Big Ten median rank 46.
Defensive success ratemedian #21
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan #2 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #7 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #21 of 70; 2017 Indiana #23 of 70; 2017 Iowa #38 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Maryland #64 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 4 of 70. Big Ten median rank 21.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Michigan #17 of 70; 2017 Maryland #19 of 70; 2017 Penn State #31 of 70; 2017 Indiana #32 of 70; 2017 Iowa #34 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Purdue #57 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #63 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #66 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 38 of 70. Big Ten median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #21
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Iowa #4 of 70; 2017 Maryland #6 of 70; 2017 Illinois #9 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #12 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Indiana #21 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #22 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #28 of 70; 2017 Penn State #32 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #52 of 70; 2017 Michigan #63 of 70. Marked: 2017 Wisconsin, ranked 18 of 70. Big Ten median rank 21.