THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

WisconsinBadgers

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Wisconsin played 9 such games.

Big Ten, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Wisconsin8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 74 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 3,791 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 653.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#31 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #5–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #5–#67. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #19–#112. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #10–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #7–#73. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #6–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #3–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Iowa State · postseason: #18 Mississippi State)#41 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,051 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.9 /g · +119 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:32 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 615.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Purdue6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 457.4 yds/g · 5,032 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 364 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 447.8 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 307 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.2 /g · +57 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:56 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.142 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Maryland5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#45 (of 74 teams · 369.7 yds/g · 3,697 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 409.8 yds/g allowed · 4,098 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 29:07 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 725.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.579 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State)#62 (of 74 teams · 331.9 yds/g · 3,319 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 315.1 yds/g allowed · 3,151 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 165 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +0.3 /g · +3 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 658.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 464.2 yds/g · 4,642 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 296 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 27:34 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 711.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 74 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 4,055 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:02 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Minnesota7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)#38 (of 74 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 3,423 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 247 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -6.8 /g · -61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:11 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 589.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.294 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Illinois4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 228 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 517.2 yds/g allowed · 4,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 45.6 pts/g allowed · 410 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.2 /g · -182 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 13 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 562.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.397 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Rutgers1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 248.8 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 11.4 pts/g · 114 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 418.4 yds/g allowed · 4,184 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -21.4 /g · -214 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15 in these games · 10 taken, 25 given · -1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 27:53 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 555.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20182018 WisconsinBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #31
Total offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #8 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Illinois #29 of 74; 2018 Indiana #31 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2018 Iowa #41 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #62 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 22 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Scoring offensemedian #31
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Iowa #20 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2018 Maryland #31 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 74; 2018 Illinois #39 of 74; 2018 Indiana #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #69 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 32 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Iowa #5 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #8 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Maryland #34 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Purdue #57 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #63 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 26 of 74. Big Ten median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #33
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Iowa #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Purdue #34 of 74; 2018 Maryland #42 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #57 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #58 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 33 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Point marginmedian #32
Point margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Purdue #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #32 of 74; 2018 Maryland #35 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #45 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #67 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 33 of 74. Big Ten median rank 32.
Turnover marginmedian #28
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #2 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Indiana #28 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #37 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Purdue #46 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 52 of 74. Big Ten median rank 28.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #18 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 Purdue #42 of 74; 2018 Maryland #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #59 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #61 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #64 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 37 of 74. Big Ten median rank 37.
Returning passingmedian #50
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #1 of 130; 2018 Iowa #21 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #27 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Maryland #50 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #75 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #126 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 1 of 130. Big Ten median rank 50.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #20 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 130; 2018 Purdue #38 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 130; 2018 Illinois #48 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #91 of 130; 2018 Maryland #98 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 51 of 130. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #68
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #10 of 130; 2018 Maryland #11 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #20 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #68 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Illinois #85 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #121 of 130; 2018 Iowa #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 19 of 130. Big Ten median rank 68.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Maryland #24 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #34 of 130; 2018 Iowa #42 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #48 of 130; 2018 Indiana #57 of 130; 2018 Illinois #58 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #60 of 130; 2018 Purdue #71 of 130. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 35 of 130. Big Ten median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #17 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Maryland #28 of 74; 2018 Illinois #33 of 74; 2018 Iowa #35 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #43 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 14 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan State #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Maryland #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Purdue #41 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #64 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 29 of 74. Big Ten median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #31
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #10 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Purdue #28 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #29 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Illinois #34 of 74; 2018 Indiana #39 of 74; 2018 Iowa #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74; 2018 Maryland #61 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #67 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 4 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Iowa #29 of 74; 2018 Indiana #42 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #47 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #52 of 74; 2018 Purdue #54 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #57 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 39 of 74. Big Ten median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #40
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #1 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Illinois #28 of 74; 2018 Iowa #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #42 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #47 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 72 of 74. Big Ten median rank 40.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #20
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Iowa #4 of 74; 2018 Purdue #7 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #16 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Maryland #20 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Wisconsin, ranked 14 of 74. Big Ten median rank 20.