Metrics

Eastern MichiganEagles

Season
Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 26 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2005, released in week 14.

AP Top 25, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Eastern Michigan470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 119 teams · 345.9 yds/g · 3,805 yards)#88 (of 119 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 240 points)#91 (of 119 teams · 408.7 yds/g allowed · 4,496 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#85 (of 119 teams · -5.0 /g · -55 on the season)#19 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 20 taken, 11 given · +0.82 /g)#63 (of 119 teams · 17:49 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#114 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#44 (Total offense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#93. 5 of 26 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring offense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#104. 7 of 26 in the top 10.)#19 (Total defense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#115. 9 of 26 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring defense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#110. 10 of 26 in the top 10.)#14 (Point margin: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#74. 10 of 26 in the top 10.)#23 (Turnover margin: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#106. 5 of 26 in the top 10.)#39 (Possession: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#119. 5 of 26 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#30 (Offensive EPA: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#87. 4 of 26 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #2–#114. 4 of 26 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive success rate: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#84. 6 of 26 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #2–#107. 6 of 26 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #24–#118. 0 of 26 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #8–#116. 1 of 26 in the top 10.)
2005USC1211 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 522.5 yds/g · 6,792 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.1 pts/g · 638 points)#40 (of 119 teams · 339.1 yds/g allowed · 4,408 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +26.2 /g · +341 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22 on the season · 37 taken, 15 given · +1.69 /g)#100 (of 119 teams · 16:17 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 1.024 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas1301 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 512.1 yds/g · 6,657 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50.1 pts/g · 652 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 302.9 yds/g allowed · 3,938 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +33.8 /g · +439 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 31 taken, 21 given · +0.77 /g)#28 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005LSU1121 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 119 teams · 374.1 yds/g · 4,863 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 266.9 yds/g allowed · 3,469 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.2 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.2 /g · +198 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g)#12 (of 119 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Penn State1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 119 teams · 421.5 yds/g · 5,058 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 413 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 304.7 yds/g allowed · 3,656 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.4 /g · +209 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 27 taken, 23 given · +0.33 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 119 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 119 teams · 1.014 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Virginia Tech1120 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 380.9 yds/g · 4,952 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 247.6 yds/g allowed · 3,219 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.9 pts/g allowed · 168 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.9 /g · +272 on the season)#23 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.69 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:59 /g · 4h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 119 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 119 teams · 1.088 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Ohio State1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 119 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 5,068 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 392 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 281.3 yds/g allowed · 3,376 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.3 pts/g allowed · 183 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.4 /g · +209 on the season)#106 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#13 (of 119 teams · 19:24 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 119 teams · 0.814 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 119 teams · 1.003 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Notre Dame930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 477.3 yds/g · 5,728 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 440 points)#81 (of 119 teams · 396.9 yds/g allowed · 4,763 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +12.2 /g · +146 on the season)#16 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:01 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#38 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oregon1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 119 teams · 360.8 yds/g · 4,330 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 414 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 275.3 yds/g allowed · 3,303 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 278 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +136 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 30 taken, 16 given · +1.17 /g)#115 (of 119 teams · 14:57 /g · 2h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 1.088 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Auburn930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 362.2 yds/g · 4,346 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 386 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 296.9 yds/g allowed · 3,563 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16.7 /g · +200 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.33 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 1.020 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 119 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Miami931 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 119 teams · 324.2 yds/g · 3,890 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 237.6 yds/g allowed · 2,851 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 171 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +12.8 /g · +154 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 31 taken, 25 given · +0.50 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:26 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 119 teams · 1.062 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 119 teams · 1.112 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005UCLA1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 431.0 yds/g · 5,172 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 469 points)#115 (of 119 teams · 468.1 yds/g allowed · 5,617 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +4.9 /g · +59 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.58 /g)#99 (of 119 teams · 16:20 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#107 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.041 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005West Virginia1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 4,667 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 385 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 3,729 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +14.3 /g · +171 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 32 taken, 17 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:55 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#54 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Georgia1031 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 119 teams · 391.1 yds/g · 5,085 yards)#42 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#23 (of 119 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,075 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +13.2 /g · +171 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 31 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 119 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 119 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Alabama1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g · 4,307 yards)#86 (of 119 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 263 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 255.1 yds/g allowed · 3,061 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 10.7 pts/g allowed · 128 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +135 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.67 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:06 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.131 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005TCU1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 119 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 4,799 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 398 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 3,949 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 223 points)#11 (of 119 teams · +14.6 /g · +175 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +24 on the season · 43 taken, 19 given · +2.00 /g)#38 (of 119 teams · 18:27 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#33 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 119 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Louisville930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 482.1 yds/g · 5,785 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 43.4 pts/g · 521 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 324.0 yds/g allowed · 3,888 yards)#47 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +19.7 /g · +236 on the season)#11 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 36 taken, 23 given · +1.08 /g)#103 (of 119 teams · 16:13 /g · 3h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.189 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.073 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Florida931 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 373.4 yds/g · 4,481 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 299.8 yds/g allowed · 3,598 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#25 (of 119 teams · +9.8 /g · +117 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +18 on the season · 32 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:58 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#32 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.044 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas Tech930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 495.8 yds/g · 5,950 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.4 pts/g · 473 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 335.8 yds/g allowed · 4,030 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.6 /g · +247 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 30 taken, 20 given · +0.83 /g)#67 (of 119 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.062 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Boston College930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 387.8 yds/g · 4,653 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#21 (of 119 teams · 311.7 yds/g allowed · 3,740 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 191 points)#24 (of 119 teams · +9.9 /g · +119 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.33 /g)#93 (of 119 teams · 16:38 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 119 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Michigan751 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 119 teams · 384.3 yds/g · 4,611 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 345 points)#45 (of 119 teams · 345.2 yds/g allowed · 4,142 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#30 (of 119 teams · +8.4 /g · +101 on the season)#37 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.42 /g)#33 (of 119 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#75 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.924 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Wisconsin1030 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 119 teams · 396.5 yds/g · 5,155 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#97 (of 119 teams · 417.4 yds/g allowed · 5,426 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +10.5 /g · +137 on the season)#14 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 28 taken, 16 given · +0.92 /g)#18 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#73 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 119 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Clemson840 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 353.1 yds/g · 4,237 yards)#61 (of 119 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 287.7 yds/g allowed · 3,452 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +8.8 /g · +105 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.67 /g)#41 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 119 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Florida State851 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 119 teams · 328.4 yds/g · 4,269 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 3,407 yards)#28 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#32 (of 119 teams · +6.9 /g · +90 on the season)#66 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 21 taken, 23 given · -0.15 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 13:41 /g · 2h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 119 teams · 1.049 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Fresno State850 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 384.1 yds/g · 4,994 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#19 (of 119 teams · 309.1 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#86 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.38 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 16:28 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#51 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Georgia Tech750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 119 teams · 349.0 yds/g · 4,188 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 222 points)#26 (of 119 teams · 317.5 yds/g allowed · 3,810 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#74 (of 119 teams · -1.6 /g · -19 on the season)#11 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 32 taken, 19 given · +1.08 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:51 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 119 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 119 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Iowa750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 432.4 yds/g · 5,189 yards)#36 (of 119 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points)#73 (of 119 teams · 382.7 yds/g allowed · 4,592 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#23 (of 119 teams · +10.0 /g · +120 on the season)#67 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.17 /g)#105 (of 119 teams · 16:04 /g · 3h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#55 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 119 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 1.045 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20052005 Eastern MichiganAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #44
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2005 Louisville #7 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Iowa #18 of 119; 2005 UCLA #19 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2005 Penn State #27 of 119; 2005 TCU #35 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #39 of 119; 2005 Georgia #43 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #44 of 119; 2005 Boston College #45 of 119; 2005 Michigan #49 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #51 of 119; 2005 LSU #53 of 119; 2005 Florida #54 of 119; 2005 Auburn #59 of 119; 2005 Oregon #60 of 119; 2005 Alabama #62 of 119; 2005 Clemson #70 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #74 of 119; 2005 Florida State #88 of 119; 2005 Miami #93 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 76 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 44.
Scoring offensemedian #26
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Louisville #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 UCLA #5 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #6 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Oregon #12 of 119; 2005 Penn State #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #14 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #17 of 119; 2005 TCU #22 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #26 of 119; 2005 Auburn #30 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #31 of 119; 2005 Iowa #36 of 119; 2005 Georgia #42 of 119; 2005 LSU #43 of 119; 2005 Florida State #44 of 119; 2005 Michigan #45 of 119; 2005 Florida #49 of 119; 2005 Miami #55 of 119; 2005 Clemson #61 of 119; 2005 Boston College #64 of 119; 2005 Alabama #86 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #104 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 88 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Total defensemedian #19
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Miami #1 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Alabama #3 of 119; 2005 Florida State #4 of 119; 2005 LSU #5 of 119; 2005 Oregon #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #8 of 119; 2005 Clemson #9 of 119; 2005 Auburn #10 of 119; 2005 Florida #14 of 119; 2005 Texas #15 of 119; 2005 Penn State #17 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #20 of 119; 2005 Boston College #21 of 119; 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #26 of 119; 2005 Louisville #27 of 119; 2005 TCU #30 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #38 of 119; 2005 USC #40 of 119; 2005 Michigan #45 of 119; 2005 Iowa #73 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #81 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #97 of 119; 2005 UCLA #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 91 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Scoring defensemedian #15
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2005 LSU #3 of 119; 2005 Miami #4 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #5 of 119; 2005 Auburn #6 of 119; 2005 Boston College #7 of 119; 2005 Texas #8 of 119; 2005 Georgia #8 of 119; 2005 Penn State #10 of 119; 2005 Clemson #11 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #13 of 119; 2005 TCU #15 of 119; 2005 Florida #18 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #18 of 119; 2005 Iowa #22 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #23 of 119; 2005 Michigan #24 of 119; 2005 Florida State #28 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #32 of 119; 2005 USC #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #38 of 119; 2005 Louisville #47 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #48 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #53 of 119; 2005 UCLA #110 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 67 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 15.
Point marginmedian #14
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 Louisville #5 of 119; 2005 Penn State #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #6 of 119; 2005 Auburn #8 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #9 of 119; 2005 LSU #10 of 119; 2005 TCU #11 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #12 of 119; 2005 Georgia #14 of 119; 2005 Miami #15 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Oregon #19 of 119; 2005 Alabama #20 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #21 of 119; 2005 Iowa #23 of 119; 2005 Boston College #24 of 119; 2005 Florida #25 of 119; 2005 Clemson #29 of 119; 2005 Michigan #30 of 119; 2005 Florida State #32 of 119; 2005 UCLA #42 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #74 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 85 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 14.
Turnover marginmedian #23
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 TCU #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Florida #3 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #7 of 119; 2005 Oregon #8 of 119; 2005 Louisville #11 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #11 of 119; 2005 Georgia #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #14 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #17 of 119; 2005 Texas #20 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #23 of 119; 2005 Alabama #24 of 119; 2005 Clemson #24 of 119; 2005 UCLA #26 of 119; 2005 Miami #30 of 119; 2005 Michigan #37 of 119; 2005 Penn State #42 of 119; 2005 Florida State #66 of 119; 2005 Iowa #67 of 119; 2005 Auburn #78 of 119; 2005 Boston College #78 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2005 LSU #100 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #106 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 19 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Possessionmedian #39
Possession. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #2 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2005 Florida #4 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #6 of 119; 2005 LSU #12 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #18 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Texas #28 of 119; 2005 Michigan #33 of 119; 2005 TCU #38 of 119; 2005 Miami #39 of 119; 2005 Clemson #41 of 119; 2005 Penn State #58 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #67 of 119; 2005 Auburn #72 of 119; 2005 Georgia #75 of 119; 2005 Boston College #93 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #96 of 119; 2005 UCLA #99 of 119; 2005 USC #100 of 119; 2005 Louisville #103 of 119; 2005 Iowa #105 of 119; 2005 Oregon #115 of 119; 2005 Florida State #119 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 63 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 39.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #30
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Louisville #5 of 119; 2005 Texas #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #16 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2005 LSU #24 of 119; 2005 Iowa #25 of 119; 2005 Penn State #26 of 119; 2005 UCLA #28 of 119; 2005 Auburn #29 of 119; 2005 Georgia #30 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #36 of 119; 2005 Clemson #37 of 119; 2005 Florida #39 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #41 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #42 of 119; 2005 Boston College #46 of 119; 2005 Alabama #52 of 119; 2005 TCU #55 of 119; 2005 Michigan #63 of 119; 2005 Miami #65 of 119; 2005 Florida State #70 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #73 of 119; 2005 Oregon #87 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 71 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 30.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Miami #6 of 119; 2005 Alabama #7 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Florida State #16 of 119; 2005 Boston College #19 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #20 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #23 of 119; 2005 Penn State #28 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #29 of 119; 2005 Florida #33 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #34 of 119; 2005 Louisville #35 of 119; 2005 Texas #37 of 119; 2005 TCU #38 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #40 of 119; 2005 Clemson #48 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Auburn #70 of 119; 2005 Iowa #73 of 119; 2005 Georgia #76 of 119; 2005 Michigan #78 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #85 of 119; 2005 USC #89 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #91 of 119; 2005 UCLA #114 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 87 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #32
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #3 of 119; 2005 Louisville #4 of 119; 2005 Texas #5 of 119; 2005 Iowa #8 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Penn State #18 of 119; 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #24 of 119; 2005 Clemson #25 of 119; 2005 LSU #30 of 119; 2005 Boston College #32 of 119; 2005 Auburn #35 of 119; 2005 UCLA #37 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #39 of 119; 2005 Michigan #43 of 119; 2005 TCU #45 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #47 of 119; 2005 Alabama #51 of 119; 2005 Florida #53 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #56 of 119; 2005 Florida State #70 of 119; 2005 Miami #79 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #80 of 119; 2005 Oregon #84 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 60 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 32.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Alabama #4 of 119; 2005 Miami #5 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #8 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Florida State #10 of 119; 2005 Penn State #12 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #15 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #18 of 119; 2005 Texas #21 of 119; 2005 Louisville #26 of 119; 2005 Boston College #31 of 119; 2005 Florida #32 of 119; 2005 TCU #33 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2005 Auburn #41 of 119; 2005 Clemson #43 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #51 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #54 of 119; 2005 Iowa #55 of 119; 2005 Georgia #56 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #73 of 119; 2005 Michigan #75 of 119; 2005 USC #82 of 119; 2005 UCLA #107 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 114 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #24 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #25 of 119; 2005 Miami #27 of 119; 2005 Florida State #31 of 119; 2005 Florida #34 of 119; 2005 UCLA #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #36 of 119; 2005 USC #45 of 119; 2005 Auburn #47 of 119; 2005 Georgia #48 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #54 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #57 of 119; 2005 Penn State #60 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #62 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 Texas #67 of 119; 2005 Alabama #72 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #73 of 119; 2005 Louisville #80 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #106 of 119; 2005 Boston College #108 of 119; 2005 Iowa #110 of 119; 2005 Michigan #111 of 119; 2005 TCU #113 of 119; 2005 Clemson #115 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #118 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 86 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #85
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2005 Boston College #20 of 119; 2005 Michigan #23 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Texas #54 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #57 of 119; 2005 Georgia #60 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #62 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 UCLA #65 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #67 of 119; 2005 Penn State #71 of 119; 2005 USC #85 of 119; 2005 Clemson #86 of 119; 2005 Iowa #87 of 119; 2005 Florida State #91 of 119; 2005 TCU #92 of 119; 2005 Louisville #97 of 119; 2005 Auburn #98 of 119; 2005 Florida #100 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #102 of 119; 2005 Oregon #104 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #106 of 119; 2005 Miami #109 of 119; 2005 Alabama #112 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Eastern Michigan, ranked 4 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 85.