Metrics

Eastern MichiganEagles

Season
Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2006, released in week 14.

AP Top 25, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Eastern Michigan1110 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#105 (of 119 teams · 276.3 yds/g · 3,315 yards)#114 (of 119 teams · 13.9 pts/g · 167 points)#100 (of 119 teams · 388.3 yds/g allowed · 4,660 yards)#92 (of 119 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 322 points)#109 (of 119 teams · -12.9 /g · -155 on the season)#80 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.33 /g)#71 (of 119 teams · 17:56 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 119 teams · -0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 119 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#97 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 119 teams · 0.750 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#24 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#96. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#78. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#95. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#69. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#42. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#79. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#119. 5 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#25 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#96. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#116. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#97. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#113. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#65 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #10–#106. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #25–#118. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2006Ohio State1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,999 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 280.5 yds/g allowed · 3,646 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.9 /g · +284 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 27 taken, 20 given · +0.54 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#30 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.977 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006USC1122 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 391.9 yds/g · 5,094 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#24 (of 119 teams · 295.9 yds/g allowed · 3,846 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 15.2 pts/g allowed · 197 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 119 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Michigan1122 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 119 teams · 370.8 yds/g · 4,820 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#11 (of 119 teams · 268.3 yds/g allowed · 3,488 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 207 points)#17 (of 119 teams · +13.3 /g · +173 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 30 taken, 13 given · +1.31 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:23 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 119 teams · -0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 119 teams · 1.052 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Florida1311 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 119 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 5,226 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 416 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 240.1 yds/g allowed · 3,361 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 189 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season)#41 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 30 taken, 25 given · +0.36 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:00 /g · 4h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 119 teams · -0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006LSU1121 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 393.5 yds/g · 5,116 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 228.8 yds/g allowed · 2,974 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.1 /g · +274 on the season)#53 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#11 (of 119 teams · 19:33 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Louisville1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 475.3 yds/g · 6,179 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 320.5 yds/g allowed · 4,166 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 16.3 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.5 /g · +279 on the season)#47 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 27 taken, 24 given · +0.23 /g)#25 (of 119 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 119 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49% of plays successful)#22 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 119 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Wisconsin1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 119 teams · 373.1 yds/g · 4,851 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 253.1 yds/g allowed · 3,290 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.1 pts/g allowed · 157 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.1 /g · +223 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 26 taken, 29 given · -0.23 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:13 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 119 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Arkansas1040 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 347.4 yds/g · 4,864 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 404 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 281.0 yds/g allowed · 3,934 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#22 (of 119 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#73 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.21 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 18:10 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 119 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oklahoma1132 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 368.7 yds/g · 5,162 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 424 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 287.1 yds/g allowed · 4,020 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +13.0 /g · +182 on the season)#79 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 32 taken, 36 given · -0.29 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 119 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Boise State1300 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 420.6 yds/g · 5,468 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 516 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 284.0 yds/g allowed · 3,692 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:34 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 119 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Auburn1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 306.9 yds/g · 3,990 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 322 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 268.5 yds/g allowed · 3,490 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +10.8 /g · +141 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 31 taken, 20 given · +0.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:24 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#49 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Notre Dame1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 119 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 5,067 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 340.2 yds/g allowed · 4,423 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#38 (of 119 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.46 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#79 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.863 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Rutgers1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 345.1 yds/g · 4,486 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 387 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 252.2 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#13 (of 119 teams · +15.5 /g · +201 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 34 taken, 19 given · +1.15 /g)#19 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 119 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 119 teams · 0.844 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.986 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Virginia Tech1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 119 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 3,837 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 336 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 219.5 yds/g allowed · 2,853 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 11.0 pts/g allowed · 143 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#44 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 31 taken, 27 given · +0.31 /g)#78 (of 119 teams · 17:50 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 119 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006West Virginia1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 461.4 yds/g · 5,998 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 505 points)#65 (of 119 teams · 336.6 yds/g allowed · 4,376 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.1 /g · +223 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.54 /g)#56 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Wake Forest1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 119 teams · 307.0 yds/g · 4,298 yards)#78 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 302 points)#50 (of 119 teams · 322.5 yds/g allowed · 4,515 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +6.2 /g · +87 on the season)#12 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 31 taken, 19 given · +0.86 /g)#51 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#67 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 119 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Tennessee941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 119 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#55 (of 119 teams · 327.5 yds/g allowed · 4,258 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#59 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#74 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 391.5 yds/g · 5,089 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 467 points)#26 (of 119 teams · 297.4 yds/g allowed · 3,866 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 238 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.6 /g · +229 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 38 taken, 24 given · +1.08 /g)#26 (of 119 teams · 18:59 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.985 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Nebraska951 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 414.6 yds/g · 5,804 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 428 points)#60 (of 119 teams · 331.9 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +12.3 /g · +172 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.07 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 4h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 119 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006BYU1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 465.5 yds/g · 6,051 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#44 (of 119 teams · 319.1 yds/g allowed · 4,149 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.7 pts/g allowed · 191 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.08 /g)#31 (of 119 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50% of plays successful)#63 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.907 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006California1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 416.0 yds/g · 5,408 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#95 (of 119 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 4,761 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +13.5 /g · +176 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 119 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 119 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas A&M941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 397.4 yds/g · 5,166 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 322.6 yds/g allowed · 4,194 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +7.3 /g · +95 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.77 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:27 /g · 4h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Georgia Tech950 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 119 teams · 332.1 yds/g · 4,649 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 349 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 300.6 yds/g allowed · 4,208 yards)#27 (of 119 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#41 (of 119 teams · +6.6 /g · +92 on the season)#34 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 29 taken, 23 given · +0.43 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 119 teams · -0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 119 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.057 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Hawai'i1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 394.4 yds/g · 5,521 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 280.1 yds/g allowed · 3,921 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.8 /g · +319 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.21 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 10:51 /g · 2h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 55% of plays successful)#113 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Boston College1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 119 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 4,589 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 311.5 yds/g allowed · 4,049 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#24 (of 119 teams · +10.3 /g · +134 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 39 taken, 22 given · +1.31 /g)#37 (of 119 teams · 18:44 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#19 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20062006 Eastern MichiganAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #24
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Louisville #1 of 119; 2006 BYU #3 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #4 of 119; 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 California #9 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #11 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #17 of 119; 2006 LSU #18 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Texas #20 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #21 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #33 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Michigan #36 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #38 of 119; 2006 Boston College #47 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #51 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #54 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #64 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #91 of 119; 2006 Auburn #92 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 105 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring offensemedian #19
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #3 of 119; 2006 Louisville #4 of 119; 2006 BYU #5 of 119; 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #8 of 119; 2006 LSU #9 of 119; 2006 California #11 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #17 of 119; 2006 USC #18 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #22 of 119; 2006 Florida #23 of 119; 2006 Michigan #26 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #26 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #31 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #34 of 119; 2006 Boston College #46 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #49 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #54 of 119; 2006 Auburn #56 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #78 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 114 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #3 of 119; 2006 Florida #5 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #6 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #7 of 119; 2006 Michigan #11 of 119; 2006 Auburn #12 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #14 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #15 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #17 of 119; 2006 Boise State #18 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #20 of 119; 2006 USC #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #30 of 119; 2006 Boston College #38 of 119; 2006 BYU #44 of 119; 2006 Louisville #46 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #50 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #51 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #55 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #60 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #65 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #69 of 119; 2006 California #95 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 100 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #17
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #1 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #4 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #5 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Auburn #7 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #8 of 119; 2006 BYU #10 of 119; 2006 USC #11 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #12 of 119; 2006 Boston College #14 of 119; 2006 Michigan #15 of 119; 2006 Louisville #17 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Boise State #20 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #24 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #27 of 119; 2006 California #32 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #44 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #49 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #67 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #69 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 92 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 17.
Point marginmedian #15
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 BYU #2 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #4 of 119; 2006 Louisville #5 of 119; 2006 LSU #6 of 119; 2006 Texas #7 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #8 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #8 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #13 of 119; 2006 USC #14 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #15 of 119; 2006 California #16 of 119; 2006 Michigan #17 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #19 of 119; 2006 Auburn #21 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #22 of 119; 2006 Boston College #24 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #37 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #41 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #42 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 109 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 15.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Michigan #2 of 119; 2006 Boston College #2 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #5 of 119; 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 BYU #6 of 119; 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #12 of 119; 2006 Auburn #13 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #17 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #24 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #30 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #34 of 119; 2006 USC #36 of 119; 2006 California #36 of 119; 2006 Florida #41 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #44 of 119; 2006 Louisville #47 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #48 of 119; 2006 LSU #53 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #59 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #63 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #73 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #74 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #79 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 80 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas A&M #2 of 119; 2006 Michigan #4 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #5 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #7 of 119; 2006 LSU #11 of 119; 2006 Auburn #14 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #19 of 119; 2006 Louisville #25 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 BYU #31 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #35 of 119; 2006 Boston College #37 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #39 of 119; 2006 Boise State #43 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #51 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #56 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #57 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #58 of 119; 2006 USC #75 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #78 of 119; 2006 California #87 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #95 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 71 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 35.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #25
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Louisville #2 of 119; 2006 BYU #4 of 119; 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #8 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #10 of 119; 2006 Boise State #11 of 119; 2006 California #15 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #16 of 119; 2006 Florida #18 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #23 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #25 of 119; 2006 Texas #32 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #36 of 119; 2006 Auburn #40 of 119; 2006 Michigan #41 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #44 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #50 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #54 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #60 of 119; 2006 Boston College #61 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #86 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #93 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 102 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 25.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Wisconsin #1 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 Boston College #8 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #11 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #13 of 119; 2006 Michigan #14 of 119; 2006 Louisville #22 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #24 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2006 Boise State #35 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #37 of 119; 2006 BYU #40 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #43 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #45 of 119; 2006 California #47 of 119; 2006 USC #48 of 119; 2006 Texas #51 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #53 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #59 of 119; 2006 Auburn #60 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #62 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #75 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #116 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 84 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #29
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 BYU #2 of 119; 2006 Louisville #3 of 119; 2006 LSU #7 of 119; 2006 Boise State #9 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #12 of 119; 2006 Texas #18 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #19 of 119; 2006 California #20 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #21 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 Michigan #29 of 119; 2006 USC #30 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Boston College #32 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #41 of 119; 2006 Auburn #42 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #46 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #48 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #52 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #54 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #68 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #76 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #97 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 82 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 29.
Defensive success ratemedian #23
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #1 of 119; 2006 LSU #2 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #4 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #5 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #8 of 119; 2006 Michigan #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #15 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #18 of 119; 2006 Boston College #19 of 119; 2006 Louisville #22 of 119; 2006 USC #23 of 119; 2006 Texas #24 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #30 of 119; 2006 Boise State #39 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #43 of 119; 2006 Auburn #49 of 119; 2006 California #53 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #61 of 119; 2006 BYU #63 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #67 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #74 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #79 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #113 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 97 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #65
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Nebraska #10 of 119; 2006 California #12 of 119; 2006 USC #25 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #35 of 119; 2006 LSU #40 of 119; 2006 Florida #45 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #47 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #48 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #50 of 119; 2006 Louisville #55 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #57 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #64 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #65 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #66 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #73 of 119; 2006 BYU #80 of 119; 2006 Boston College #83 of 119; 2006 Boise State #87 of 119; 2006 Auburn #90 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #91 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #93 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #94 of 119; 2006 Michigan #100 of 119; 2006 Texas #102 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #106 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 118 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 65.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #71
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #25 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #26 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #29 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #31 of 119; 2006 Boise State #40 of 119; 2006 BYU #47 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #49 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #53 of 119; 2006 Boston College #55 of 119; 2006 California #57 of 119; 2006 LSU #66 of 119; 2006 Auburn #70 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #71 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #73 of 119; 2006 Texas #87 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #89 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #90 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #92 of 119; 2006 Florida #97 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #101 of 119; 2006 Louisville #103 of 119; 2006 Michigan #109 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #112 of 119; 2006 USC #113 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Eastern Michigan, ranked 15 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 71.