THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Florida StateSeminoles

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Florida State played 10 such games.

ACC, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Florida State5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 424.9 yds/g allowed · 4,249 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -14.3 /g · -143 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 10 taken, 21 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:09 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 888.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 74 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.513 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#61. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#64. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #4–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#73. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #2–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#71. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #17–#120. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #16–#114. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #8–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #5–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #3–#64. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #4–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #6–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#22 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #2–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range #19–#74. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Clemson15–01 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 534.2 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 46.2 pts/g · 462 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.1 yds/g allowed · 3,101 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +30.8 /g · +308 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.362 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Miami7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 74 teams · 336.1 yds/g · 3,025 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 290.1 yds/g allowed · 2,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.1 /g · +37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:38 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 753.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.403 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Pittsburgh7–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 Syracuse)#34 (of 74 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 3,971 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 3,907 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +0.8 /g · +8 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.433 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.317 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Syracuse10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia)#15 (of 74 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g · 3,048 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 267 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 427.6 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.8 /g · +38 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:27 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 629.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 350.4 yds/g · 3,154 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 345.1 yds/g allowed · 3,106 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:09 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 542.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 74 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.168 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 372.7 yds/g · 3,354 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 383.1 yds/g allowed · 3,448 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +0.4 /g · +4 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 18 taken, 10 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:38 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 583.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.283 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018North Carolina2–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 74 teams · 424.8 yds/g · 3,823 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 3,981 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -8.9 /g · -80 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 28:07 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 688.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern)#44 (of 74 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,702 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 448.1 yds/g allowed · 4,481 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:00 /g · 4h 30m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 635.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia Tech6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 74 teams · 387.0 yds/g · 3,483 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 432.6 yds/g allowed · 3,893 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · -7.0 /g · -63 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 30:05 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 675.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.466 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 74 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 3,790 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 4,368 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 338 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -8.7 /g · -78 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 9 taken, 11 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 525.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Boston College7–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 357.1 yds/g · 3,214 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 3,778 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1.8 /g · -16 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:55 /g · 4h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Louisville2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 3,576 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 464.5 yds/g allowed · 4,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50.5 pts/g allowed · 505 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -31.9 /g · -319 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 632.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.399 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20182018 Florida StateACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #15 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #23 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #34 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #36 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #42 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Louisville #51 of 74; 2018 Boston College #52 of 74; 2018 Virginia #54 of 74; 2018 Miami #61 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 57 of 74. ACC median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #37
Scoring offense. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #7 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #17 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #30 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #37 of 74; 2018 Boston College #43 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 74; 2018 Miami #47 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 62 of 74. ACC median rank 37.
Total defensemedian #46
Total defense. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Clemson #6 of 74; 2018 Virginia #13 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #25 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Boston College #42 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 NC State #48 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #49 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #56 of 74; 2018 Duke #58 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 47 of 74. ACC median rank 46.
Scoring defensemedian #38
Scoring defense. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Miami #12 of 74; 2018 Virginia #16 of 74; 2018 Boston College #25 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #35 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #38 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #47 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #63 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 56 of 74. ACC median rank 38.
Point marginmedian #31
Point margin. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 74; 2018 NC State #21 of 74; 2018 Miami #22 of 74; 2018 Virginia #29 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #30 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #31 of 74; 2018 Boston College #40 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #56 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 60 of 74. ACC median rank 31.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Syracuse #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #7 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2018 Boston College #27 of 74; 2018 NC State #31 of 74; 2018 Miami #32 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #32 of 74; 2018 Clemson #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #42 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #44 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #54 of 74; 2018 Duke #56 of 74; 2018 Louisville #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 71 of 74. ACC median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #4 of 74; 2018 NC State #5 of 74; 2018 Virginia #7 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #26 of 74; 2018 Louisville #33 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #38 of 74; 2018 Clemson #49 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #51 of 74; 2018 Miami #56 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Duke #67 of 74; 2018 Boston College #68 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 71 of 74. ACC median rank 38.
Returning passingmedian #49
Returning passing. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Duke #17 of 130; 2018 NC State #24 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #29 of 130; 2018 Miami #33 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #37 of 130; 2018 Clemson #49 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #52 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #53 of 130; 2018 Boston College #61 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #95 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #99 of 130; 2018 Louisville #105 of 130; 2018 Virginia #120 of 130. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 40 of 130. ACC median rank 49.
Returning receivingmedian #67
Returning receiving. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Duke #16 of 130; 2018 Boston College #22 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #36 of 130; 2018 Louisville #46 of 130; 2018 NC State #47 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #67 of 130; 2018 Clemson #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia #72 of 130; 2018 Miami #79 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #82 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #110 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #114 of 130. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 57 of 130. ACC median rank 67.
Returning rushingmedian #33
Returning rushing. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Syracuse #14 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #21 of 130; 2018 Clemson #27 of 130; 2018 Miami #30 of 130; 2018 Virginia #33 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2018 Duke #62 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #71 of 130; 2018 Boston College #72 of 130; 2018 NC State #110 of 130; 2018 Louisville #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 8 of 130. ACC median rank 33.
Team talentmedian #39
Team talent. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #5 of 130; 2018 Miami #20 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #28 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #30 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #38 of 130; 2018 Duke #39 of 130; 2018 Louisville #40 of 130; 2018 NC State #41 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #49 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #54 of 130; 2018 Virginia #66 of 130; 2018 Boston College #69 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 130. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 7 of 130. ACC median rank 39.
Offensive EPAmedian #41
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #15 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #23 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #44 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 Miami #54 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2018 Louisville #63 of 74; 2018 Boston College #64 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 59 of 74. ACC median rank 41.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Clemson #5 of 74; 2018 Boston College #18 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2018 Virginia #25 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #26 of 74; 2018 Duke #37 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #44 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #48 of 74; 2018 NC State #53 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #62 of 74; 2018 Louisville #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 24 of 74. ACC median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #48
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 NC State #6 of 74; 2018 Clemson #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #41 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #42 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #49 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Duke #52 of 74; 2018 Louisville #56 of 74; 2018 Miami #65 of 74; 2018 Boston College #66 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 73 of 74. ACC median rank 48.
Defensive success ratemedian #30
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Virginia #12 of 74; 2018 Boston College #24 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Duke #30 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #37 of 74; 2018 NC State #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #68 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 18 of 74. ACC median rank 30.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #22
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Pittsburgh #6 of 74; 2018 Miami #7 of 74; 2018 Boston College #14 of 74; 2018 Clemson #15 of 74; 2018 Louisville #20 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #22 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Duke #29 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #36 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Virginia #63 of 74; 2018 NC State #66 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 2 of 74. ACC median rank 22.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #42
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Georgia Tech #19 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #21 of 74; 2018 Louisville #23 of 74; 2018 Boston College #32 of 74; 2018 Miami #33 of 74; 2018 Clemson #40 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #42 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #49 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 NC State #54 of 74; 2018 Virginia #57 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Florida State, ranked 46 of 74. ACC median rank 42.