THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Georgia TechYellow Jackets

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

ACC, 2011

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Georgia Tech8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 458.8 yds/g · 5,964 yds)#21 (of 120 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#44 (of 120 teams · 359.3 yds/g allowed · 4,671 yds)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +8.2 /g · +107 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#24 (of 120 teams · 19:34 /g · 4h 14m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#50 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.985 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 120 teams · 1.015 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#63 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #16–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #21–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #4–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #4–#102. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #14–#104. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #15–#106. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #6–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #8–#107. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #10–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #33–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #5–#110. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #6–#106. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #7–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Florida State9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 120 teams · 369.1 yds/g · 4,799 yds)#39 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 275.1 yds/g allowed · 3,577 yds)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 196 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +15.5 /g · +202 on the season)#26 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#33 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Virginia Tech11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 413.0 yds/g · 5,782 yds)#57 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 391 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 304.6 yds/g allowed · 4,265 yds)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 247 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +10.3 /g · +144 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.29 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:37 /g · 4h 49m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 120 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#44 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 120 teams · 1.040 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Miami6–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 377.8 yds/g · 4,533 yds)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 318 points)#45 (of 120 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 4,319 yds)#18 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#40 (of 120 teams · +6.4 /g · +77 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.67 /g)#66 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#47 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#97 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.838 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Wake Forest6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 120 teams · 367.8 yds/g · 4,781 yds)#68 (of 120 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 397.9 yds/g allowed · 5,172 yds)#65 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#72 (of 120 teams · -1.4 /g · -18 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.69 /g)#61 (of 120 teams · 18:20 /g · 3h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#98 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.031 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.914 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Clemson10–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 440.8 yds/g · 6,171 yds)#24 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 470 points)#72 (of 120 teams · 394.4 yds/g allowed · 5,521 yds)#81 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#52 (of 120 teams · +4.3 /g · +60 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.14 /g)#101 (of 120 teams · 17:19 /g · 4h 02m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#42 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#74 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Duke3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 366.3 yds/g · 4,395 yds)#93 (of 120 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 270 points)#95 (of 120 teams · 425.4 yds/g allowed · 5,105 yds)#90 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#97 (of 120 teams · -8.7 /g · -104 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 12 taken, 21 given · -0.75 /g)#48 (of 120 teams · 18:43 /g · 3h 45m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#110 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.019 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011NC State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 4,483 yds)#54 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#41 (of 120 teams · 355.1 yds/g allowed · 4,616 yds)#54 (of 120 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +46 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 35 taken, 27 given · +0.62 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:11 /g · 4h 09m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#110 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011North Carolina7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 120 teams · 393.2 yds/g · 5,112 yds)#56 (of 120 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 364 points)#50 (of 120 teams · 365.2 yds/g allowed · 4,748 yds)#56 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#58 (of 120 teams · +3.1 /g · +41 on the season)#72 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.15 /g)#86 (of 120 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#43 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#55 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 399.8 yds/g · 5,197 yds)#86 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 302 points)#40 (of 120 teams · 351.7 yds/g allowed · 4,572 yds)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#70 (of 120 teams · -0.6 /g · -8 on the season)#100 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.62 /g)#12 (of 120 teams · 20:26 /g · 4h 26m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#54 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.962 average PPA on successful plays)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.049 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Maryland2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 120 teams · 379.7 yds/g · 4,556 yds)#87 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 277 points)#109 (of 120 teams · 457.2 yds/g allowed · 5,486 yds)#102 (of 120 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#104 (of 120 teams · -11.2 /g · -134 on the season)#35 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 26 taken, 23 given · +0.25 /g)#117 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 15:36 /g · 3h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#106 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.913 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Boston College4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 298.8 yds/g · 3,585 yds)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 218 points)#71 (of 120 teams · 394.3 yds/g allowed · 4,732 yds)#43 (of 120 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#86 (of 120 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#93 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g)#50 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 3h 43m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 120 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#99 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#85 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.978 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20112011 Georgia TechACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #63
Total offense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Clemson #24 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #34 of 120; 2011 Virginia #44 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #51 of 120; 2011 Maryland #63 of 120; 2011 Miami #65 of 120; 2011 Florida State #72 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #74 of 120; 2011 Duke #75 of 120; 2011 NC State #92 of 120; 2011 Boston College #112 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 16 of 120. ACC median rank 63.
Scoring offensemedian #57
Scoring offense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Clemson #24 of 120; 2011 Florida State #39 of 120; 2011 NC State #54 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #56 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #57 of 120; 2011 Miami #63 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #68 of 120; 2011 Virginia #86 of 120; 2011 Maryland #87 of 120; 2011 Duke #93 of 120; 2011 Boston College #112 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 21 of 120. ACC median rank 57.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #4 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2011 Virginia #40 of 120; 2011 NC State #41 of 120; 2011 Miami #45 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #50 of 120; 2011 Boston College #71 of 120; 2011 Clemson #72 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #76 of 120; 2011 Duke #95 of 120; 2011 Maryland #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 44 of 120. ACC median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #4 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #7 of 120; 2011 Miami #18 of 120; 2011 Boston College #43 of 120; 2011 Virginia #46 of 120; 2011 NC State #54 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #56 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #65 of 120; 2011 Clemson #81 of 120; 2011 Duke #90 of 120; 2011 Maryland #102 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 60 of 120. ACC median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #56
Point margin. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #14 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #25 of 120; 2011 Miami #40 of 120; 2011 Clemson #52 of 120; 2011 NC State #56 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #58 of 120; 2011 Virginia #70 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #72 of 120; 2011 Boston College #86 of 120; 2011 Duke #97 of 120; 2011 Maryland #104 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 31 of 120. ACC median rank 56.
Turnover marginmedian #53
Turnover margin. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wake Forest #15 of 120; 2011 NC State #21 of 120; 2011 Florida State #26 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #34 of 120; 2011 Maryland #35 of 120; 2011 Clemson #71 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #72 of 120; 2011 Boston College #93 of 120; 2011 Virginia #100 of 120; 2011 Miami #101 of 120; 2011 Duke #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 53 of 120. ACC median rank 53.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Virginia Tech #6 of 120; 2011 Virginia #12 of 120; 2011 NC State #30 of 120; 2011 Duke #48 of 120; 2011 Boston College #50 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #61 of 120; 2011 Miami #66 of 120; 2011 Florida State #70 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #86 of 120; 2011 Clemson #101 of 120; 2011 Maryland #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 24 of 120. ACC median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Miami #31 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #36 of 120; 2011 Florida State #49 of 120; 2011 Virginia #50 of 120; 2011 Clemson #60 of 120; 2011 Duke #65 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #71 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #78 of 120; 2011 Maryland #94 of 120; 2011 Boston College #102 of 120; 2011 NC State #107 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 8 of 120. ACC median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #41
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #10 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #15 of 120; 2011 Virginia #24 of 120; 2011 NC State #33 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #36 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #41 of 120; 2011 Clemson #63 of 120; 2011 Miami #71 of 120; 2011 Boston College #75 of 120; 2011 Maryland #104 of 120; 2011 Duke #115 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 59 of 120. ACC median rank 41.
Offensive success ratemedian #47
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #33 of 120; 2011 Clemson #42 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #43 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #44 of 120; 2011 Miami #47 of 120; 2011 Virginia #54 of 120; 2011 Maryland #64 of 120; 2011 Duke #86 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #98 of 120; 2011 Boston College #99 of 120; 2011 NC State #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 37 of 120. ACC median rank 47.
Defensive success ratemedian #55
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #5 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #6 of 120; 2011 Virginia #8 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #52 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #55 of 120; 2011 NC State #60 of 120; 2011 Clemson #74 of 120; 2011 Boston College #85 of 120; 2011 Miami #97 of 120; 2011 Maryland #106 of 120; 2011 Duke #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 50 of 120. ACC median rank 55.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #39
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wake Forest #6 of 120; 2011 Duke #7 of 120; 2011 Miami #23 of 120; 2011 Boston College #28 of 120; 2011 Virginia #39 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #40 of 120; 2011 Clemson #46 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #61 of 120; 2011 Maryland #69 of 120; 2011 NC State #76 of 120; 2011 Florida State #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 22 of 120. ACC median rank 39.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Miami #7 of 120; 2011 Boston College #11 of 120; 2011 Clemson #30 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #51 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #61 of 120; 2011 Maryland #62 of 120; 2011 NC State #82 of 120; 2011 Florida State #84 of 120; 2011 Duke #90 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #110 of 120; 2011 Virginia #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Georgia Tech, ranked 106 of 120. ACC median rank 62.