THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Georgia TechYellow Jackets

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Georgia Tech played 10 such games.

ACC, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Georgia Tech5–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#31 (of 70 teams · 398.6 yds/g · 3,986 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 3,708 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1.0 /g · -10 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 7 taken, 15 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:43 /g · 5h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 70 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#31 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#63. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #6–#62. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #7–#68. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #6–#60. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #8–#59. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #4–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#117. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#91 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #14–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#65. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#67. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#60. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#60. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#67. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #7–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2017Clemson12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami, #22 Virginia Tech, #24 NC State)#25 (of 70 teams · 416.8 yds/g · 4,168 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 306.3 yds/g allowed · 3,063 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 853.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 70 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 551.1 yds/g · 5,511 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 4,411 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 312 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Miami10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Notre Dame, #22 Virginia Tech)#35 (of 70 teams · 390.6 yds/g · 3,515 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 258 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · +11.1 /g · +100 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 26 taken, 11 given · +1.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 749.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 70 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 70 teams · 441.6 yds/g · 4,416 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 3,746 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · +2.0 /g · +20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:07 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 70 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 70 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 3,702 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 30:14 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 535.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 70 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Duke7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Northwestern)#43 (of 70 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 3,760 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 3,599 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 627.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 70 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 70 teams · 365.4 yds/g · 3,289 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 216 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 334.4 yds/g allowed · 3,010 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 145 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +7.9 /g · +71 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 31:46 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 662.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 70 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.444 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wake Forest8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#15 (of 70 teams · 443.3 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.2 yds/g allowed · 4,322 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:57 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 527.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida State7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 313.7 yds/g · 3,137 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 201 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 355.2 yds/g allowed · 3,552 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 925.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Pittsburgh5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)#51 (of 70 teams · 356.5 yds/g · 3,565 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 406.4 yds/g allowed · 4,064 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -7.1 /g · -71 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 32:05 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 70 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)#60 (of 70 teams · 317.1 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 30:58 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 603.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)#14 (of 70 teams · 444.8 yds/g · 4,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 490.7 yds/g allowed · 4,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · -13.0 /g · -117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 5 taken, 17 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 539.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.430 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017North Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 70 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 3,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.4 pts/g · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · -14.8 /g · -148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:59 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 697.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20172017 Georgia TechACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #31
Total offense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #14 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #15 of 70; 2017 NC State #16 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #29 of 70; 2017 Miami #35 of 70; 2017 Duke #43 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #51 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Florida State #63 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 31 of 70. ACC median rank 31.
Scoring offensemedian #42
Scoring offense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #6 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #17 of 70; 2017 Clemson #21 of 70; 2017 Miami #24 of 70; 2017 NC State #27 of 70; 2017 Boston College #42 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #47 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 70; 2017 Duke #52 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #54 of 70; 2017 Florida State #60 of 70; 2017 Virginia #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #62 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 35 of 70. ACC median rank 42.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #7 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #11 of 70; 2017 Florida State #17 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Virginia #20 of 70; 2017 Duke #21 of 70; 2017 NC State #29 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Boston College #37 of 70; 2017 Louisville #47 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #62 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 26 of 70. ACC median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #28
Scoring defense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #6 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 Miami #8 of 70; 2017 Duke #18 of 70; 2017 Florida State #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #38 of 70; 2017 Virginia #41 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #45 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #54 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 32 of 70. ACC median rank 28.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Miami #12 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Louisville #20 of 70; 2017 NC State #26 of 70; 2017 Duke #30 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #33 of 70; 2017 Boston College #35 of 70; 2017 Florida State #45 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #50 of 70; 2017 Virginia #54 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #57 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 39 of 70. ACC median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #31
Turnover margin. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Miami #1 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #9 of 70; 2017 Boston College #14 of 70; 2017 Louisville #15 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #21 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Duke #31 of 70; 2017 NC State #33 of 70; 2017 Virginia #39 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #43 of 70; 2017 Florida State #53 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #63 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 61 of 70. ACC median rank 31.
Possessionmedian #23
Possession. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 NC State #6 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #12 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Clemson #16 of 70; 2017 Duke #20 of 70; 2017 Virginia #23 of 70; 2017 Louisville #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #37 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #41 of 70; 2017 Miami #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #65 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 4 of 70. ACC median rank 23.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Duke #1 of 130; 2017 NC State #1 of 130; 2017 Florida State #45 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 130; 2017 Louisville #51 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2017 Virginia #64 of 130; 2017 Boston College #105 of 130; 2017 Clemson #110 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #111 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #115 of 130; 2017 Miami #122 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 106 of 130. ACC median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #70
Returning receiving. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #1 of 130; 2017 Boston College #7 of 130; 2017 Duke #27 of 130; 2017 NC State #31 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #56 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #70 of 130; 2017 Virginia #72 of 130; 2017 Miami #81 of 130; 2017 Louisville #88 of 130; 2017 Clemson #95 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #109 of 130; 2017 Florida State #111 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #117 of 130. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 8 of 130. ACC median rank 70.
Returning rushingmedian #91
Returning rushing. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #23 of 130; 2017 Boston College #58 of 130; 2017 Louisville #62 of 130; 2017 Duke #66 of 130; 2017 Miami #76 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #91 of 130; 2017 NC State #92 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Florida State #109 of 130; 2017 Clemson #119 of 130; 2017 Virginia #126 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 117 of 130. ACC median rank 91.
Team talentmedian #36
Team talent. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida State #5 of 130; 2017 Clemson #9 of 130; 2017 Miami #20 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #27 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #33 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #34 of 130; 2017 Louisville #36 of 130; 2017 Duke #40 of 130; 2017 NC State #44 of 130; 2017 Virginia #47 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #63 of 130; 2017 Boston College #65 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 130. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 52 of 130. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #2 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 70; 2017 NC State #23 of 70; 2017 Clemson #27 of 70; 2017 Miami #34 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #45 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #47 of 70; 2017 Boston College #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #58 of 70; 2017 Duke #60 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #61 of 70; 2017 Florida State #62 of 70; 2017 Virginia #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 30 of 70. ACC median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Miami #3 of 70; 2017 Clemson #4 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #10 of 70; 2017 Duke #14 of 70; 2017 Florida State #23 of 70; 2017 Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #30 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #38 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #39 of 70; 2017 Louisville #46 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #55 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 37 of 70. ACC median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #34
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #25 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #29 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #34 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #43 of 70; 2017 Miami #47 of 70; 2017 Boston College #48 of 70; 2017 Florida State #55 of 70; 2017 Duke #57 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 18 of 70. ACC median rank 34.
Defensive success ratemedian #33
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Virginia Tech #5 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Duke #12 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Virginia #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #42 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #56 of 70; 2017 Louisville #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 49 of 70. ACC median rank 33.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #44
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #5 of 70; 2017 Miami #6 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #13 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #23 of 70; 2017 NC State #24 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #36 of 70; 2017 Boston College #44 of 70; 2017 Duke #48 of 70; 2017 Virginia #50 of 70; 2017 Florida State #52 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #60 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #64 of 70; 2017 Clemson #67 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 49 of 70. ACC median rank 44.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Miami #23 of 70; 2017 Clemson #24 of 70; 2017 NC State #25 of 70; 2017 Virginia #29 of 70; 2017 Louisville #30 of 70; 2017 Florida State #35 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #49 of 70; 2017 Boston College #50 of 70; 2017 Duke #53 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #57 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Georgia Tech, ranked 7 of 70. ACC median rank 35.