THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Georgia TechYellow Jackets

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Georgia Tech played 10 such games.

ACC, 2023

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2023Georgia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#20 (of 73 teams · 415.4 yds/g · 4,154 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 299 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 451.5 yds/g allowed · 4,515 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · -1.6 /g · -16 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 29:20 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 133 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 133 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 133 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 133 teams · 710.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 73 teams · 0.261 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 0.267 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 1.347 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20230 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #3–#63. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #13–#65. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #5–#71. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #6–#66. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #7–#63. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #5–#61. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #5–#72. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #1–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #1–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #2–#109. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #5–#70. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #17–#64. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #8–#61. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#43 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #7–#67. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #2–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #4–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #8–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2023Florida State13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 LSU, #15 Louisville, #22 Clemson)#22 (of 73 teams · 410.7 yds/g · 4,107 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 330.2 yds/g allowed · 3,302 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 175 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +16.6 /g · +166 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 13 taken, 5 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 29:29 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 133 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 133 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 133 teams · 765.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 73 teams · 0.243 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 1.289 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Clemson9–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Notre Dame)#33 (of 73 teams · 382.2 yds/g · 3,822 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 298.3 yds/g allowed · 2,983 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 208 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · +2.8 /g · +28 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:23 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 133 teams · 22% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 133 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 133 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 917.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 73 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.087 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 1.364 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 NC State, #22 Clemson)#49 (of 73 teams · 335.2 yds/g · 3,352 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 383.9 yds/g allowed · 3,839 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · +2.7 /g · +27 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 28:14 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 133 teams · 620.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 73 teams · 0.189 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Clemson)#55 (of 73 teams · 321.4 yds/g · 2,893 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 333.2 yds/g allowed · 2,999 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · +2.8 /g · +25 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 19 taken, 11 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 32:30 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 133 teams · 19% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 133 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 133 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 133 teams · 700.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 73 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023North Carolina8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 492.6 yds/g · 4,926 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 340 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 408.4 yds/g allowed · 4,084 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 284 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +5.6 /g · +56 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 28:56 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 133 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 133 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 133 teams · 805.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 73 teams · 0.270 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Louisville10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Notre Dame, #18 NC State)#19 (of 73 teams · 415.7 yds/g · 4,573 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 340 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 328.2 yds/g allowed · 3,610 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 240 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · +9.1 /g · +100 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 32:15 /g · 5h 55m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 133 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 133 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 133 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 133 teams · 744.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 73 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.441 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Miami7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Clemson)#23 (of 73 teams · 407.7 yds/g · 3,669 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 258 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 3,230 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · +1.1 /g · +10 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 32:02 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 133 teams · 72% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 133 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 133 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 133 teams · 860.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 73 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.435 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 SMU)#32 (of 73 teams · 383.0 yds/g · 3,064 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 197 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 432.8 yds/g allowed · 3,462 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -8.0 /g · -64 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 13 taken, 14 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 31:02 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 (of 133 teams · 46% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 133 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 133 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 133 teams · 650.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 73 teams · 0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 0.292 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.382 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.443 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Syracuse6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 73 teams · 303.6 yds/g · 2,732 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 164 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 427.1 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · -10.9 /g · -98 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 27:54 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 133 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 133 teams · 47% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 133 teams · 610.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 73 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.152 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#28 (of 73 teams · 392.4 yds/g · 3,924 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 290 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 319.1 yds/g allowed · 3,191 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · +4.0 /g · +40 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 8 taken, 12 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 31:07 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 133 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 133 teams · 638.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 73 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 1.321 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Virginia3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 73 teams · 357.7 yds/g · 3,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 429.7 yds/g allowed · 4,297 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 356 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · -13.9 /g · -139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 31:39 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 133 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 133 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 133 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 133 teams · 622.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 73 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 0.254 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 1.186 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Pittsburgh3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Louisville)#63 (of 73 teams · 302.2 yds/g · 3,324 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 197 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 382.9 yds/g allowed · 4,212 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · -11.3 /g · -124 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · -6 in these games · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.55 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 26:21 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 133 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 133 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 133 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 133 teams · 700.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 73 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 1.329 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2023Wake Forest4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 73 teams · 308.1 yds/g · 3,081 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 179 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 408.9 yds/g allowed · 4,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · -10.6 /g · -106 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · -6 in these games · 12 taken, 18 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 133 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 133 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 133 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 133 teams · 603.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20232023 Georgia TechACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #3 of 73; 2023 Louisville #19 of 73; 2023 Florida State #22 of 73; 2023 Miami #23 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #28 of 73; 2023 Boston College #32 of 73; 2023 Clemson #33 of 73; 2023 Virginia #45 of 73; 2023 Duke #49 of 73; 2023 NC State #55 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #59 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #61 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #63 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 20 of 73. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #13 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #14 of 73; 2023 Louisville #20 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #28 of 73; 2023 Miami #30 of 73; 2023 Duke #38 of 73; 2023 Boston College #40 of 73; 2023 Clemson #44 of 73; 2023 NC State #46 of 73; 2023 Virginia #49 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #62 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #64 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #65 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 24 of 73. ACC median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #5 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #11 of 73; 2023 Louisville #14 of 73; 2023 Florida State #16 of 73; 2023 NC State #17 of 73; 2023 Miami #24 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #34 of 73; 2023 Duke #36 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #46 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #47 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #56 of 73; 2023 Virginia #59 of 73; 2023 Boston College #60 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 71 of 73. ACC median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #36
Scoring defense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #6 of 73; 2023 NC State #12 of 73; 2023 Clemson #14 of 73; 2023 Louisville #17 of 73; 2023 Duke #18 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #26 of 73; 2023 Miami #36 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #38 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #40 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #42 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #43 of 73; 2023 Boston College #57 of 73; 2023 Virginia #66 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 52 of 73. ACC median rank 36.
Point marginmedian #29
Point margin. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #7 of 73; 2023 Louisville #15 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #18 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #22 of 73; 2023 Clemson #27 of 73; 2023 NC State #28 of 73; 2023 Duke #29 of 73; 2023 Miami #31 of 73; 2023 Boston College #52 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #54 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #55 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #57 of 73; 2023 Virginia #63 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 40 of 73. ACC median rank 29.
Turnover marginmedian #39
Turnover margin. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 NC State #5 of 73; 2023 Florida State #6 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #23 of 73; 2023 Louisville #25 of 73; 2023 Clemson #28 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #39 of 73; 2023 Boston College #42 of 73; 2023 Duke #43 of 73; 2023 Virginia #52 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #52 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #58 of 73; 2023 Miami #59 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #61 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 11 of 73. ACC median rank 39.
Possessionmedian #24
Possession. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #5 of 73; 2023 NC State #8 of 73; 2023 Louisville #11 of 73; 2023 Miami #14 of 73; 2023 Virginia #15 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #22 of 73; 2023 Boston College #24 of 73; 2023 Florida State #38 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #44 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #52 of 73; 2023 Duke #58 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #65 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #72 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 39 of 73. ACC median rank 24.
Returning passingmedian #71
Returning passing. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #1 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #13 of 133; 2023 Florida State #23 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #33 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #44 of 133; 2023 Miami #60 of 133; 2023 Boston College #71 of 133; 2023 Louisville #76 of 133; 2023 Clemson #83 of 133; 2023 NC State #87 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #100 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #108 of 133; 2023 Virginia #125 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 72 of 133. ACC median rank 71.
Returning receivingmedian #49
Returning receiving. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #1 of 133; 2023 Miami #24 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #34 of 133; 2023 Clemson #35 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #39 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #45 of 133; 2023 Florida State #49 of 133; 2023 Boston College #54 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #61 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #62 of 133; 2023 NC State #66 of 133; 2023 Virginia #109 of 133; 2023 Louisville #118 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 109 of 133. ACC median rank 49.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #2 of 133; 2023 Duke #4 of 133; 2023 Boston College #26 of 133; 2023 Florida State #33 of 133; 2023 NC State #46 of 133; 2023 Clemson #47 of 133; 2023 Virginia #55 of 133; 2023 Miami #68 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #77 of 133; 2023 Louisville #88 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #89 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #92 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #109 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 107 of 133. ACC median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #38
Team talent. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #5 of 133; 2023 Miami #12 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #17 of 133; 2023 Florida State #20 of 133; 2023 Louisville #29 of 133; 2023 NC State #38 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #39 of 133; 2023 Boston College #55 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #59 of 133; 2023 Virginia #66 of 133; 2023 Duke #67 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #69 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #70 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 36 of 133. ACC median rank 38.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #17 of 73; 2023 Florida State #21 of 73; 2023 Louisville #22 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #26 of 73; 2023 Boston College #32 of 73; 2023 Duke #34 of 73; 2023 Miami #35 of 73; 2023 NC State #50 of 73; 2023 Virginia #53 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #54 of 73; 2023 Clemson #57 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #62 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #64 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 19 of 73. ACC median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #30
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #8 of 73; 2023 NC State #9 of 73; 2023 Florida State #11 of 73; 2023 Louisville #13 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #19 of 73; 2023 Miami #28 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #30 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #31 of 73; 2023 Duke #34 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #37 of 73; 2023 Virginia #53 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #57 of 73; 2023 Boston College #61 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 56 of 73. ACC median rank 30.
Offensive success ratemedian #43
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Louisville #7 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #16 of 73; 2023 Florida State #28 of 73; 2023 Clemson #30 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #37 of 73; 2023 Duke #43 of 73; 2023 Boston College #45 of 73; 2023 Virginia #46 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #49 of 73; 2023 Miami #52 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #62 of 73; 2023 NC State #66 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #67 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 24 of 73. ACC median rank 43.
Defensive success ratemedian #30
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #2 of 73; 2023 Florida State #9 of 73; 2023 Louisville #10 of 73; 2023 NC State #15 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #16 of 73; 2023 Miami #24 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #30 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #32 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #39 of 73; 2023 Boston College #40 of 73; 2023 Duke #47 of 73; 2023 Virginia #53 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #61 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 70 of 73. ACC median rank 30.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #23
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Miami #4 of 73; 2023 Florida State #6 of 73; 2023 Boston College #10 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #21 of 73; 2023 NC State #22 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #23 of 73; 2023 Duke #28 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #38 of 73; 2023 Syracuse #41 of 73; 2023 Louisville #54 of 73; 2023 Virginia #60 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #69 of 73; 2023 Clemson #71 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 16 of 73. ACC median rank 23.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #37
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Syracuse #8 of 73; 2023 Duke #11 of 73; 2023 North Carolina #25 of 73; 2023 Virginia #35 of 73; 2023 NC State #36 of 73; 2023 Florida State #37 of 73; 2023 Wake Forest #45 of 73; 2023 Pittsburgh #49 of 73; 2023 Virginia Tech #51 of 73; 2023 Miami #54 of 73; 2023 Clemson #59 of 73; 2023 Louisville #68 of 73; 2023 Boston College #69 of 73. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 13 of 73. ACC median rank 37.