Metrics

Georgia TechYellow Jackets

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2023

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2023Georgia Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 133 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 5,520 yards)#43 (of 133 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 404 points)#122 (of 133 teams · 436.0 yds/g allowed · 5,668 yards)#97 (of 133 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#67 (of 133 teams · +1.6 /g · +21 on the season)#39 (of 133 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.31 /g)#103 (of 133 teams · 28:39 /g · 6h 12m on the season)#72 (of 133 teams · 44% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 133 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#107 (of 133 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#36 (of 133 teams · 710.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 133 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 133 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 133 teams · 45% of plays successful)#126 (of 133 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 133 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 133 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20230 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#60 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #7–#116. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #19–#116. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#42 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #8–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #16–#119. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#47 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #12–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#66 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #12–#113. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #7–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #1–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #1–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #2–#109. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #5–#70. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #17–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #10–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#66 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #11–#113. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #2–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#72 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #6–#133. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#82 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range #11–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2023Boston College760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 SMU)#71 (of 133 teams · 380.8 yds/g · 4,950 yards)#82 (of 133 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 323 points)#72 (of 133 teams · 383.9 yds/g allowed · 4,991 yards)#86 (of 133 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#88 (of 133 teams · -3.5 /g · -45 on the season)#82 (of 133 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.15 /g)#28 (of 133 teams · 31:28 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#71 (of 133 teams · 46% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 133 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#26 (of 133 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 133 teams · 650.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 133 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 133 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 133 teams · 42% of plays successful)#79 (of 133 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 133 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 133 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Clemson945 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Notre Dame)#52 (of 133 teams · 402.7 yds/g · 5,235 yards)#52 (of 133 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#8 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 288.2 yds/g allowed · 3,747 yards)#30 (of 133 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 274 points)#31 (of 133 teams · +8.8 /g · +114 on the season)#24 (of 133 teams · +6 on the season · 28 taken, 22 given · +0.46 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 33:06 /g · 7h 10m on the season)#83 (of 133 teams · 22% of last season's passing production returning)#35 (of 133 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#47 (of 133 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 917.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 133 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 133 teams · 45% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#133 (of 133 teams · 1.039 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 133 teams · 1.345 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Duke850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 NC State, #22 Clemson)#97 (of 133 teams · 347.6 yds/g · 4,519 yards)#68 (of 133 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#42 (of 133 teams · 352.7 yds/g allowed · 4,585 yards)#16 (of 133 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 247 points)#36 (of 133 teams · +7.9 /g · +103 on the season)#67 (of 133 teams · +0 on the season · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g)#94 (of 133 teams · 29:00 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 133 teams · 620.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 133 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 133 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 133 teams · 41% of plays successful)#78 (of 133 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 133 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 133 teams · 1.134 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Florida State1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 LSU, #15 Louisville, #22 Clemson)#54 (of 133 teams · 400.7 yds/g · 5,610 yards)#19 (of 133 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 484 points)#28 (of 133 teams · 331.9 yds/g allowed · 4,647 yards)#18 (of 133 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#12 (of 133 teams · +15.3 /g · +214 on the season)#17 (of 133 teams · +8 on the season · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.57 /g)#81 (of 133 teams · 29:24 /g · 6h 51m on the season)#23 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#49 (of 133 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 133 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 133 teams · 765.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 133 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 133 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 133 teams · 41% of plays successful)#16 (of 133 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 1.424 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 133 teams · 1.259 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Louisville1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Notre Dame, #18 NC State)#42 (of 133 teams · 415.1 yds/g · 5,812 yards)#44 (of 133 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 430 points)#21 (of 133 teams · 317.0 yds/g allowed · 4,438 yards)#35 (of 133 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#28 (of 133 teams · +9.4 /g · +132 on the season)#66 (of 133 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.07 /g)#18 (of 133 teams · 32:13 /g · 7h 31m on the season)#76 (of 133 teams · 38% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 133 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#88 (of 133 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#29 (of 133 teams · 744.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 133 teams · 0.227 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 133 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 133 teams · 48% of plays successful)#13 (of 133 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 133 teams · 1.183 average PPA on successful plays)#126 (of 133 teams · 1.412 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Miami761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Clemson)#31 (of 133 teams · 431.1 yds/g · 5,605 yards)#39 (of 133 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#24 (of 133 teams · 321.6 yds/g allowed · 4,181 yards)#44 (of 133 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 296 points)#32 (of 133 teams · +8.7 /g · +113 on the season)#96 (of 133 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#22 (of 133 teams · 31:52 /g · 6h 54m on the season)#60 (of 133 teams · 72% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 133 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 133 teams · 57% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 133 teams · 860.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 133 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 133 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 133 teams · 43% of plays successful)#34 (of 133 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 133 teams · 1.330 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 133 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023NC State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Clemson)#93 (of 133 teams · 350.4 yds/g · 4,555 yards)#72 (of 133 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 341 points)#29 (of 133 teams · 332.1 yds/g allowed · 4,317 yards)#25 (of 133 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#49 (of 133 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#12 (of 133 teams · +9 on the season · 24 taken, 15 given · +0.69 /g)#14 (of 133 teams · 32:27 /g · 7h 02m on the season)#87 (of 133 teams · 19% of last season's passing production returning)#66 (of 133 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 133 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#38 (of 133 teams · 700.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 133 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 133 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 133 teams · 40% of plays successful)#32 (of 133 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 133 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 133 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023North Carolina850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 491.2 yds/g · 6,386 yards)#20 (of 133 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 449 points)#97 (of 133 teams · 404.4 yds/g allowed · 5,257 yards)#75 (of 133 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#39 (of 133 teams · +7.2 /g · +94 on the season)#31 (of 133 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#105 (of 133 teams · 28:37 /g · 6h 12m on the season)#33 (of 133 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 133 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 133 teams · 805.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 133 teams · 0.283 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 133 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 133 teams · 47% of plays successful)#61 (of 133 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 133 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 133 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Pittsburgh390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Louisville)#116 (of 133 teams · 317.9 yds/g · 3,815 yards)#116 (of 133 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 242 points)#51 (of 133 teams · 361.5 yds/g allowed · 4,338 yards)#76 (of 133 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#108 (of 133 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#104 (of 133 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#121 (of 133 teams · 27:37 /g · 5h 31m on the season)#108 (of 133 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 133 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 133 teams · 35% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 133 teams · 700.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 133 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 133 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 133 teams · 38% of plays successful)#37 (of 133 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 133 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 133 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Syracuse670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#99 (of 133 teams · 343.6 yds/g · 4,467 yards)#92 (of 133 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 306 points)#67 (of 133 teams · 380.4 yds/g allowed · 4,945 yards)#57 (of 133 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#82 (of 133 teams · -1.9 /g · -24 on the season)#82 (of 133 teams · -2 on the season · 22 taken, 24 given · -0.15 /g)#113 (of 133 teams · 28:17 /g · 6h 08m on the season)#13 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 133 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 133 teams · 47% of last season's rushing production returning)#69 (of 133 teams · 610.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 133 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 133 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 133 teams · 38% of plays successful)#62 (of 133 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 133 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 133 teams · 1.147 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Virginia390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#78 (of 133 teams · 368.8 yds/g · 4,425 yards)#95 (of 133 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 279 points)#104 (of 133 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 4,911 yards)#119 (of 133 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#118 (of 133 teams · -10.5 /g · -126 on the season)#113 (of 133 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g)#30 (of 133 teams · 31:25 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#125 (of 133 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 133 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 133 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#66 (of 133 teams · 622.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 133 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 133 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 133 teams · 41% of plays successful)#112 (of 133 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 133 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 133 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Virginia Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 133 teams · 391.4 yds/g · 5,088 yards)#56 (of 133 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#20 (of 133 teams · 316.8 yds/g allowed · 4,118 yards)#51 (of 133 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#47 (of 133 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#63 (of 133 teams · +1 on the season · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.08 /g)#40 (of 133 teams · 31:10 /g · 6h 45m on the season)#44 (of 133 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#59 (of 133 teams · 638.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 133 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 133 teams · 0.151 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 133 teams · 42% of plays successful)#29 (of 133 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 133 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 133 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Wake Forest480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2023. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#107 (of 133 teams · 326.4 yds/g · 3,917 yards)#115 (of 133 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 243 points)#76 (of 133 teams · 386.7 yds/g allowed · 4,640 yards)#74 (of 133 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#105 (of 133 teams · -6.9 /g · -83 on the season)#113 (of 133 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.50 /g)#88 (of 133 teams · 29:06 /g · 5h 49m on the season)#100 (of 133 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#45 (of 133 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#92 (of 133 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#70 (of 133 teams · 603.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 133 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 133 teams · 0.213 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 133 teams · 40% of plays successful)#53 (of 133 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#126 (of 133 teams · 1.108 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 133 teams · 1.305 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20232023 Georgia TechACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #60
Total offense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #7 of 133; 2023 Miami #31 of 133; 2023 Louisville #42 of 133; 2023 Clemson #52 of 133; 2023 Florida State #54 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #60 of 133; 2023 Boston College #71 of 133; 2023 Virginia #78 of 133; 2023 NC State #93 of 133; 2023 Duke #97 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #99 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #107 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #116 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 34 of 133. ACC median rank 60.
Scoring offensemedian #56
Scoring offense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #19 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #20 of 133; 2023 Miami #39 of 133; 2023 Louisville #44 of 133; 2023 Clemson #52 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #56 of 133; 2023 Duke #68 of 133; 2023 NC State #72 of 133; 2023 Boston College #82 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #92 of 133; 2023 Virginia #95 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #115 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #116 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 43 of 133. ACC median rank 56.
Total defensemedian #42
Total defense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #8 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #20 of 133; 2023 Louisville #21 of 133; 2023 Miami #24 of 133; 2023 Florida State #28 of 133; 2023 NC State #29 of 133; 2023 Duke #42 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #51 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #67 of 133; 2023 Boston College #72 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #76 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #97 of 133; 2023 Virginia #104 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 122 of 133. ACC median rank 42.
Scoring defensemedian #51
Scoring defense. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #16 of 133; 2023 Florida State #18 of 133; 2023 NC State #25 of 133; 2023 Clemson #30 of 133; 2023 Louisville #35 of 133; 2023 Miami #44 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #51 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #57 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #74 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #75 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #76 of 133; 2023 Boston College #86 of 133; 2023 Virginia #119 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 97 of 133. ACC median rank 51.
Point marginmedian #47
Point margin. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #12 of 133; 2023 Louisville #28 of 133; 2023 Clemson #31 of 133; 2023 Miami #32 of 133; 2023 Duke #36 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #39 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #47 of 133; 2023 NC State #49 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #82 of 133; 2023 Boston College #88 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #105 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #108 of 133; 2023 Virginia #118 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 67 of 133. ACC median rank 47.
Turnover marginmedian #66
Turnover margin. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 NC State #12 of 133; 2023 Florida State #17 of 133; 2023 Clemson #24 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #31 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #63 of 133; 2023 Louisville #66 of 133; 2023 Duke #67 of 133; 2023 Boston College #82 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #82 of 133; 2023 Miami #96 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #104 of 133; 2023 Virginia #113 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #113 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 39 of 133. ACC median rank 66.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #7 of 133; 2023 NC State #14 of 133; 2023 Louisville #18 of 133; 2023 Miami #22 of 133; 2023 Boston College #28 of 133; 2023 Virginia #30 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #40 of 133; 2023 Florida State #81 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #88 of 133; 2023 Duke #94 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #105 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #113 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #121 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 103 of 133. ACC median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #71
Returning passing. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #1 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #13 of 133; 2023 Florida State #23 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #33 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #44 of 133; 2023 Miami #60 of 133; 2023 Boston College #71 of 133; 2023 Louisville #76 of 133; 2023 Clemson #83 of 133; 2023 NC State #87 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #100 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #108 of 133; 2023 Virginia #125 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 72 of 133. ACC median rank 71.
Returning receivingmedian #49
Returning receiving. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #1 of 133; 2023 Miami #24 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #34 of 133; 2023 Clemson #35 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #39 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #45 of 133; 2023 Florida State #49 of 133; 2023 Boston College #54 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #61 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #62 of 133; 2023 NC State #66 of 133; 2023 Virginia #109 of 133; 2023 Louisville #118 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 109 of 133. ACC median rank 49.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #2 of 133; 2023 Duke #4 of 133; 2023 Boston College #26 of 133; 2023 Florida State #33 of 133; 2023 NC State #46 of 133; 2023 Clemson #47 of 133; 2023 Virginia #55 of 133; 2023 Miami #68 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #77 of 133; 2023 Louisville #88 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #89 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #92 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #109 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 107 of 133. ACC median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #38
Team talent. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #5 of 133; 2023 Miami #12 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #17 of 133; 2023 Florida State #20 of 133; 2023 Louisville #29 of 133; 2023 NC State #38 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #39 of 133; 2023 Boston College #55 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #59 of 133; 2023 Virginia #66 of 133; 2023 Duke #67 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #69 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #70 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 36 of 133. ACC median rank 38.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 North Carolina #17 of 133; 2023 Miami #36 of 133; 2023 Louisville #43 of 133; 2023 Florida State #44 of 133; 2023 Boston College #54 of 133; 2023 Duke #62 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #63 of 133; 2023 NC State #78 of 133; 2023 Virginia #87 of 133; 2023 Clemson #91 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #92 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #117 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #124 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 34 of 133. ACC median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #41
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #10 of 133; 2023 Florida State #14 of 133; 2023 Louisville #16 of 133; 2023 NC State #21 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #30 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #32 of 133; 2023 Miami #41 of 133; 2023 Duke #44 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #60 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #78 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #97 of 133; 2023 Boston College #108 of 133; 2023 Virginia #112 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 110 of 133. ACC median rank 41.
Offensive success ratemedian #66
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Louisville #11 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #17 of 133; 2023 Clemson #35 of 133; 2023 Miami #52 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #64 of 133; 2023 Boston College #66 of 133; 2023 Duke #77 of 133; 2023 Florida State #79 of 133; 2023 Virginia #83 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #92 of 133; 2023 NC State #93 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #112 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #113 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 42 of 133. ACC median rank 66.
Defensive success ratemedian #37
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Clemson #2 of 133; 2023 Louisville #13 of 133; 2023 Florida State #16 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #29 of 133; 2023 NC State #32 of 133; 2023 Miami #34 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #37 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #53 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #61 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #62 of 133; 2023 Duke #78 of 133; 2023 Boston College #79 of 133; 2023 Virginia #112 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 126 of 133. ACC median rank 37.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #72
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Florida State #6 of 133; 2023 Miami #26 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #52 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #57 of 133; 2023 Boston College #59 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #72 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #74 of 133; 2023 Duke #84 of 133; 2023 NC State #90 of 133; 2023 Virginia #96 of 133; 2023 Louisville #105 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #126 of 133; 2023 Clemson #133 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 30 of 133. ACC median rank 72.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #82
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Duke #11 of 133; 2023 Syracuse #14 of 133; 2023 Virginia #54 of 133; 2023 Florida State #65 of 133; 2023 Virginia Tech #75 of 133; 2023 North Carolina #82 of 133; 2023 NC State #88 of 133; 2023 Miami #89 of 133; 2023 Wake Forest #94 of 133; 2023 Pittsburgh #100 of 133; 2023 Clemson #108 of 133; 2023 Boston College #112 of 133; 2023 Louisville #126 of 133. Marked: 2023 Georgia Tech, ranked 35 of 133. ACC median rank 82.