Metrics

Miami (OH)RedHawks

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Miami (OH)660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#92 (of 130 teams · 372.0 yds/g · 4,464 yards)#75 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 337 points)#44 (of 130 teams · 368.2 yds/g allowed · 4,418 yards)#51 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#61 (of 130 teams · +2.6 /g · +31 on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.50 /g)#44 (of 130 teams · 30:23 /g · 6h 05m on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's passing production returning)#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 421.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 130 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#57 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 130 teams · 1.346 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 130 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#83 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #17–#129. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #9–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #36–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #30–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#87 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #11–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #6–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #7–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#78 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #12–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #1–#128. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #6–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#104 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #80–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #6–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #18–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#96 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #3–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #17–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #11–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #3–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2018Akron480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern)#127 (of 130 teams · 295.8 yds/g · 3,549 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 227 points)#65 (of 130 teams · 392.0 yds/g allowed · 4,704 yards)#67 (of 130 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#105 (of 130 teams · -8.3 /g · -99 on the season)#102 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g)#98 (of 130 teams · 28:09 /g · 5h 38m on the season)#87 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's passing production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#88 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#110 (of 130 teams · 361.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 130 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 130 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 130 teams · 35% of plays successful)#68 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 130 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 130 teams · 1.083 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Ball State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 130 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 4,891 yards)#101 (of 130 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#109 (of 130 teams · 450.3 yds/g allowed · 5,403 yards)#96 (of 130 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 389 points)#105 (of 130 teams · -8.3 /g · -99 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.33 /g)#102 (of 130 teams · 27:54 /g · 5h 35m on the season)#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#109 (of 130 teams · 362.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 130 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 130 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#123 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 130 teams · 1.170 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 130 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Bowling Green390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#107 (of 130 teams · 355.0 yds/g · 4,260 yards)#99 (of 130 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 292 points)#114 (of 130 teams · 454.3 yds/g allowed · 5,452 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 40.0 pts/g allowed · 480 points)#123 (of 130 teams · -15.7 /g · -188 on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.67 /g)#75 (of 130 teams · 29:19 /g · 5h 52m on the season)#78 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#104 (of 130 teams · 375.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 130 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#123 (of 130 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#121 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 130 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Buffalo1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 130 teams · 415.4 yds/g · 5,815 yards)#29 (of 130 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 484 points)#37 (of 130 teams · 355.4 yds/g allowed · 4,975 yards)#58 (of 130 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#39 (of 130 teams · +8.6 /g · +121 on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.29 /g)#30 (of 130 teams · 31:22 /g · 7h 19m on the season)#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 369.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 130 teams · 0.192 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 130 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#39 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 130 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 130 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Central Michigan1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#129 (of 130 teams · 255.8 yds/g · 3,070 yards)#128 (of 130 teams · 15.0 pts/g · 180 points)#42 (of 130 teams · 357.7 yds/g allowed · 4,292 yards)#71 (of 130 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#113 (of 130 teams · -12.3 /g · -148 on the season)#102 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.42 /g)#121 (of 130 teams · 26:39 /g · 5h 20m on the season)#107 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#92 (of 130 teams · 413.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#129 (of 130 teams · -0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#127 (of 130 teams · 35% of plays successful)#44 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#130 (of 130 teams · 1.020 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Eastern Michigan760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#94 (of 130 teams · 371.4 yds/g · 4,828 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 351 points)#36 (of 130 teams · 354.1 yds/g allowed · 4,603 yards)#30 (of 130 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#53 (of 130 teams · +4.9 /g · +64 on the season)#11 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 24 taken, 14 given · +0.77 /g)#57 (of 130 teams · 30:00 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 344.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 130 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 130 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#45 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 130 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.034 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Kent State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#83 (of 130 teams · 383.6 yds/g · 4,603 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 287 points)#118 (of 130 teams · 469.7 yds/g allowed · 5,636 yards)#116 (of 130 teams · 36.7 pts/g allowed · 440 points)#114 (of 130 teams · -12.8 /g · -153 on the season)#76 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#103 (of 130 teams · 27:49 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#94 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's passing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 351.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 130 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 130 teams · 0.193 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 130 teams · 37% of plays successful)#78 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 130 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Northern Illinois860 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#124 (of 130 teams · 322.3 yds/g · 4,512 yards)#121 (of 130 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 282 points)#40 (of 130 teams · 357.0 yds/g allowed · 4,998 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#87 (of 130 teams · -2.5 /g · -35 on the season)#71 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.07 /g)#99 (of 130 teams · 28:09 /g · 6h 34m on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing production returning)#88 (of 130 teams · 432.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 130 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 130 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#17 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 130 teams · 1.033 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Ohio940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 130 teams · 466.8 yds/g · 6,068 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 521 points)#64 (of 130 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 5,079 yards)#44 (of 130 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points)#11 (of 130 teams · +15.5 /g · +201 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +12 on the season · 31 taken, 19 given · +0.92 /g)#11 (of 130 teams · 33:16 /g · 7h 12m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 346.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.318 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 130 teams · 0.213 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 53% of plays successful)#73 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 130 teams · 1.192 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 130 teams · 1.333 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Toledo760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#28 (of 130 teams · 444.0 yds/g · 5,772 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 525 points)#91 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g allowed · 5,597 yards)#84 (of 130 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 397 points)#31 (of 130 teams · +9.8 /g · +128 on the season)#47 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g)#74 (of 130 teams · 29:20 /g · 6h 21m on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's rushing production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 464.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 130 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 130 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#81 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 130 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Western Michigan760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 130 teams · 438.4 yds/g · 5,699 yards)#39 (of 130 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 416 points)#56 (of 130 teams · 386.6 yds/g allowed · 5,026 yards)#106 (of 130 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 449 points)#88 (of 130 teams · -2.5 /g · -33 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.08 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:37 /g · 7h 17m on the season)#65 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing production returning)#29 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#95 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 442.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 130 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 130 teams · 0.250 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#77 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 130 teams · 1.136 average PPA on successful plays)#126 (of 130 teams · 1.394 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20182018 Miami (OH)Mid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #83
Total offense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #17 of 130; 2018 Toledo #28 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #32 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #52 of 130; 2018 Ball State #64 of 130; 2018 Kent State #83 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #94 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #107 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Akron #127 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 92 of 130. Mid-American median rank 83.
Scoring offensemedian #81
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Toledo #9 of 130; 2018 Ohio #12 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #29 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #39 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #81 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #99 of 130; 2018 Ball State #101 of 130; 2018 Kent State #104 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #121 of 130; 2018 Akron #125 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 75 of 130. Mid-American median rank 81.
Total defensemedian #56
Total defense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Eastern Michigan #36 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #37 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #40 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #42 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #56 of 130; 2018 Ohio #64 of 130; 2018 Akron #65 of 130; 2018 Toledo #91 of 130; 2018 Ball State #109 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #114 of 130; 2018 Kent State #118 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 44 of 130. Mid-American median rank 56.
Scoring defensemedian #67
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Eastern Michigan #30 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #35 of 130; 2018 Ohio #44 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #58 of 130; 2018 Akron #67 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #71 of 130; 2018 Toledo #84 of 130; 2018 Ball State #96 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #106 of 130; 2018 Kent State #116 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 51 of 130. Mid-American median rank 67.
Point marginmedian #87
Point margin. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #11 of 130; 2018 Toledo #31 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #39 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #53 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #87 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #88 of 130; 2018 Akron #105 of 130; 2018 Ball State #105 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #113 of 130; 2018 Kent State #114 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 61 of 130. Mid-American median rank 87.
Turnover marginmedian #62
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #6 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #11 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #44 of 130; 2018 Toledo #47 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #62 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #71 of 130; 2018 Kent State #76 of 130; 2018 Ball State #91 of 130; 2018 Akron #102 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #102 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 26 of 130. Mid-American median rank 62.
Possessionmedian #74
Possession. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Western Michigan #7 of 130; 2018 Ohio #11 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #30 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #57 of 130; 2018 Toledo #74 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #75 of 130; 2018 Akron #98 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #99 of 130; 2018 Ball State #102 of 130; 2018 Kent State #103 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #121 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 44 of 130. Mid-American median rank 74.
Returning passingmedian #78
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #12 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #57 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #58 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #65 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #78 of 130; 2018 Ball State #81 of 130; 2018 Akron #87 of 130; 2018 Kent State #94 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #107 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #108 of 130; 2018 Toledo #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 62 of 130. Mid-American median rank 78.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ball State #1 of 130; 2018 Toledo #9 of 130; 2018 Kent State #15 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #29 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #37 of 130; 2018 Ohio #55 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #89 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #117 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #118 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #123 of 130; 2018 Akron #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 76 of 130. Mid-American median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #43
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Buffalo #12 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #15 of 130; 2018 Ball State #17 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #32 of 130; 2018 Ohio #43 of 130; 2018 Kent State #52 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #76 of 130; 2018 Akron #88 of 130; 2018 Toledo #93 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #95 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #111 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 6 of 130. Mid-American median rank 43.
Team talentmedian #104
Team talent. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Toledo #80 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #84 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #88 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #104 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #106 of 130; 2018 Ball State #109 of 130; 2018 Akron #110 of 130; 2018 Kent State #114 of 130; 2018 Ohio #117 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #119 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 90 of 130. Mid-American median rank 104.
Offensive EPAmedian #75
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #6 of 130; 2018 Toledo #40 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #52 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #57 of 130; 2018 Ball State #75 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #93 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #100 of 130; 2018 Kent State #103 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #121 of 130; 2018 Akron #126 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 70 of 130. Mid-American median rank 75.
Defensive EPAmedian #67
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Northern Illinois #18 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #24 of 130; 2018 Akron #26 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #28 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #65 of 130; 2018 Toledo #77 of 130; 2018 Kent State #87 of 130; 2018 Ohio #101 of 130; 2018 Ball State #106 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #114 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 67 of 130. Mid-American median rank 67.
Offensive success ratemedian #96
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #3 of 130; 2018 Toledo #34 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #45 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #67 of 130; 2018 Ball State #69 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #96 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #97 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #103 of 130; 2018 Kent State #120 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #127 of 130; 2018 Akron #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 109 of 130. Mid-American median rank 96.
Defensive success ratemedian #68
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Northern Illinois #17 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #39 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #44 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #45 of 130; 2018 Akron #68 of 130; 2018 Ohio #73 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #77 of 130; 2018 Kent State #78 of 130; 2018 Toledo #81 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #121 of 130; 2018 Ball State #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 57 of 130. Mid-American median rank 68.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #57
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kent State #21 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #44 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #49 of 130; 2018 Toledo #54 of 130; 2018 Akron #57 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #68 of 130; 2018 Ohio #81 of 130; 2018 Ball State #92 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #103 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #129 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 11 of 130. Mid-American median rank 57.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #69
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Eastern Michigan #3 of 130; 2018 Akron #14 of 130; 2018 Ball State #22 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #31 of 130; 2018 Toledo #63 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #82 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #90 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #96 of 130; 2018 Kent State #108 of 130; 2018 Ohio #113 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Miami (OH), ranked 69 of 130. Mid-American median rank 69.