THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big Ten, 2010

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Michigan State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 388.5 yds/g · 5,051 yds)#47 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#43 (of 120 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 4,599 yds)#39 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#39 (of 120 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:14 /g · 4h 23m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#58 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#58 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.981 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Big Ten teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #8–#104. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #5–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#43 (Total defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#110. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #5–#108. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#96. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#108. 3 of 11 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #3–#103. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#32 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #1–#116. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #9–#113. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #1–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#86 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #6–#107. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#100 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #15–#118. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #14–#105. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)
2010Ohio State12–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 120 teams · 448.6 yds/g · 5,832 yds)#11 (of 120 teams · 38.8 pts/g · 504 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 261.9 yds/g allowed · 3,405 yds)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +24.5 /g · +318 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#21 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#16 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Wisconsin11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 445.1 yds/g · 5,787 yds)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.5 pts/g · 539 points)#20 (of 120 teams · 321.8 yds/g allowed · 4,183 yds)#25 (of 120 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.9 /g · +272 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 23 taken, 9 given · +1.08 /g)#15 (of 120 teams · 19:54 /g · 4h 19m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 54% of plays successful)#56 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.846 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Iowa8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#57 (of 120 teams · 382.9 yds/g · 4,978 yds)#50 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 332.1 yds/g allowed · 4,317 yds)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 221 points)#21 (of 120 teams · +11.9 /g · +155 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 24 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#28 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Illinois7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 120 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 5,162 yds)#26 (of 120 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 423 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 351.3 yds/g allowed · 4,567 yds)#48 (of 120 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +9.1 /g · +118 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.62 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:38 /g · 4h 28m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#48 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#42 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.839 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Michigan7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 488.7 yds/g · 6,353 yds)#25 (of 120 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 426 points)#110 (of 120 teams · 450.8 yds/g allowed · 5,860 yds)#108 (of 120 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 458 points)#80 (of 120 teams · -2.5 /g · -32 on the season)#108 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 19 taken, 29 given · -0.77 /g)#103 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#12 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#90 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 387.5 yds/g · 4,650 yds)#56 (of 120 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 326 points)#90 (of 120 teams · 410.2 yds/g allowed · 4,922 yds)#102 (of 120 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#89 (of 120 teams · -6.8 /g · -82 on the season)#99 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 13 taken, 20 given · -0.58 /g)#42 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 3h 48m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#107 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.840 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.889 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Penn State7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 372.2 yds/g · 4,839 yds)#81 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 319 points)#35 (of 120 teams · 346.9 yds/g allowed · 4,509 yds)#50 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#63 (of 120 teams · +0.8 /g · +11 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#59 (of 120 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#59 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#88 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Minnesota3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 120 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 4,336 yds)#89 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 278 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 392.2 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yds)#98 (of 120 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.17 /g)#14 (of 120 teams · 19:57 /g · 3h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#88 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#93 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.982 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 120 teams · 391.1 yds/g · 5,084 yds)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 343 points)#97 (of 120 teams · 426.1 yds/g allowed · 5,540 yds)#77 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#81 (of 120 teams · -2.6 /g · -34 on the season)#62 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#48 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#11 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.819 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Purdue4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#104 (of 120 teams · 311.6 yds/g · 3,739 yds)#105 (of 120 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 236 points)#62 (of 120 teams · 369.0 yds/g allowed · 4,428 yds)#74 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#95 (of 120 teams · -9.1 /g · -109 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 21 taken, 27 given · -0.50 /g)#96 (of 120 teams · 17:34 /g · 3h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#105 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#86 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.802 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20102010 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Michigan #8 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #20 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #21 of 120; 2010 Illinois #45 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #48 of 120; 2010 Indiana #54 of 120; 2010 Iowa #57 of 120; 2010 Penn State #68 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #77 of 120; 2010 Purdue #104 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 53 of 120. Big Ten median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #50
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #5 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #11 of 120; 2010 Michigan #25 of 120; 2010 Illinois #26 of 120; 2010 Iowa #50 of 120; 2010 Indiana #56 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #63 of 120; 2010 Penn State #81 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #89 of 120; 2010 Purdue #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 47 of 120. Big Ten median rank 50.
Total defensemedian #43
Total defense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #20 of 120; 2010 Iowa #25 of 120; 2010 Penn State #35 of 120; 2010 Illinois #38 of 120; 2010 Purdue #62 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #76 of 120; 2010 Indiana #90 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #97 of 120; 2010 Michigan #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 43 of 120. Big Ten median rank 43.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2010 Iowa #7 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2010 Illinois #48 of 120; 2010 Penn State #50 of 120; 2010 Purdue #74 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #77 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #98 of 120; 2010 Indiana #102 of 120; 2010 Michigan #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 39 of 120. Big Ten median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #7 of 120; 2010 Iowa #21 of 120; 2010 Illinois #32 of 120; 2010 Penn State #63 of 120; 2010 Michigan #80 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #81 of 120; 2010 Indiana #89 of 120; 2010 Purdue #95 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #96 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 39 of 120. Big Ten median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #6 of 120; 2010 Iowa #7 of 120; 2010 Illinois #22 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #45 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #62 of 120; 2010 Penn State #74 of 120; 2010 Purdue #90 of 120; 2010 Indiana #99 of 120; 2010 Michigan #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 32 of 120. Big Ten median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Illinois #3 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #14 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #15 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #21 of 120; 2010 Indiana #42 of 120; 2010 Iowa #43 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #48 of 120; 2010 Penn State #59 of 120; 2010 Purdue #96 of 120; 2010 Michigan #103 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 8 of 120. Big Ten median rank 42.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #32
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2010 Michigan #11 of 120; 2010 Iowa #14 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #23 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #32 of 120; 2010 Illinois #35 of 120; 2010 Penn State #53 of 120; 2010 Indiana #67 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #72 of 120; 2010 Purdue #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 24 of 120. Big Ten median rank 32.
Defensive EPAmedian #79
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #9 of 120; 2010 Illinois #25 of 120; 2010 Penn State #63 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #75 of 120; 2010 Iowa #79 of 120; 2010 Purdue #81 of 120; 2010 Michigan #99 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #101 of 120; 2010 Indiana #103 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 54 of 120. Big Ten median rank 79.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #11 of 120; 2010 Michigan #12 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #16 of 120; 2010 Iowa #28 of 120; 2010 Indiana #41 of 120; 2010 Illinois #48 of 120; 2010 Penn State #59 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #88 of 120; 2010 Purdue #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 58 of 120. Big Ten median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #86
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #6 of 120; 2010 Illinois #42 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #56 of 120; 2010 Iowa #80 of 120; 2010 Purdue #86 of 120; 2010 Penn State #88 of 120; 2010 Michigan #90 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #93 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #105 of 120; 2010 Indiana #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 58 of 120. Big Ten median rank 86.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #100
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Minnesota #15 of 120; 2010 Iowa #25 of 120; 2010 Penn State #46 of 120; 2010 Michigan #50 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #100 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #105 of 120; 2010 Indiana #108 of 120; 2010 Illinois #109 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #114 of 120; 2010 Purdue #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 17 of 120. Big Ten median rank 100.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #46
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Penn State #14 of 120; 2010 Illinois #23 of 120; 2010 Iowa #24 of 120; 2010 Indiana #42 of 120; 2010 Michigan #45 of 120; 2010 Purdue #46 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #49 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #79 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #100 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Michigan State, ranked 75 of 120. Big Ten median rank 46.