THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big Ten, 2011

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Michigan State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 390.4 yds/g · 5,466 yds)#37 (of 120 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 434 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 278.0 yds/g allowed · 3,892 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#17 (of 120 teams · +12.6 /g · +177 on the season)#27 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.50 /g)#33 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 28m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#71 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.895 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.987 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big Ten teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#66 (Total offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #12–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #6–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #6–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #5–#114. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Point margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #3–#101. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #16–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#61 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #1–#99. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#102. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #2–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #20–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #17–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 120 teams · 469.9 yds/g · 6,578 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 44.1 pts/g · 618 points)#20 (of 120 teams · 316.4 yds/g allowed · 4,430 yds)#13 (of 120 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +352 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 27 taken, 10 given · +1.21 /g)#16 (of 120 teams · 20:01 /g · 4h 40m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.213 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#32 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.981 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Illinois7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 120 teams · 355.7 yds/g · 4,624 yds)#91 (of 120 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 294 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 286.1 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yds)#15 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 255 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#91 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 22 taken, 28 given · -0.46 /g)#20 (of 120 teams · 19:43 /g · 4h 16m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#57 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Michigan11–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 382.5 yds/g · 4,973 yds)#26 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 433 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 300.7 yds/g allowed · 3,909 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#13 (of 120 teams · +15.9 /g · +207 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#68 (of 120 teams · 18:09 /g · 3h 56m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.024 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#72 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.905 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Penn State9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 120 teams · 342.4 yds/g · 4,451 yds)#110 (of 120 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 251 points)#24 (of 120 teams · 323.9 yds/g allowed · 4,211 yds)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points)#61 (of 120 teams · +2.5 /g · +33 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 25 taken, 25 given · +0.00 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 04m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#92 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.915 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Iowa7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 120 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yds)#58 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 358 points)#62 (of 120 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yds)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.7 /g · +48 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:29 /g · 3h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#48 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#70 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 379.9 yds/g · 4,939 yds)#50 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 379 points)#37 (of 120 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,560 yds)#42 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#42 (of 120 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g)#55 (of 120 teams · 18:32 /g · 4h 01m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#68 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Ohio State6–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 120 teams · 318.1 yds/g · 4,136 yds)#81 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 318 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 323.5 yds/g allowed · 4,206 yds)#27 (of 120 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#57 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.38 /g)#42 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#96 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#39 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Purdue7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 120 teams · 376.9 yds/g · 4,899 yds)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#75 (of 120 teams · 396.1 yds/g allowed · 5,149 yds)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#68 (of 120 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#52 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.867 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Minnesota3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 310.3 yds/g · 3,724 yds)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#78 (of 120 teams · 403.3 yds/g allowed · 4,839 yds)#93 (of 120 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#108 (of 120 teams · -13.3 /g · -159 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 9 taken, 17 given · -0.67 /g)#89 (of 120 teams · 17:37 /g · 3h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#88 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#98 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Indiana1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 120 teams · 360.4 yds/g · 4,325 yds)#101 (of 120 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#110 (of 120 teams · 459.0 yds/g allowed · 5,508 yds)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 448 points)#110 (of 120 teams · -15.9 /g · -191 on the season)#79 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g)#105 (of 120 teams · 17:05 /g · 3h 25m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#102 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.859 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Northwestern6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 420.9 yds/g · 5,471 yds)#51 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#81 (of 120 teams · 407.7 yds/g allowed · 5,300 yds)#66 (of 120 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#66 (of 120 teams · +1.2 /g · +16 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.23 /g)#27 (of 120 teams · 19:16 /g · 4h 10m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#11 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#87 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.821 average PPA on successful plays)#113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.068 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20112011 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #66
Total offense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #12 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #33 of 120; 2011 Michigan #60 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #62 of 120; 2011 Purdue #66 of 120; 2011 Iowa #71 of 120; 2011 Indiana #78 of 120; 2011 Illinois #81 of 120; 2011 Penn State #93 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #107 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 53 of 120. Big Ten median rank 66.
Scoring offensemedian #58
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #6 of 120; 2011 Michigan #26 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #50 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #51 of 120; 2011 Iowa #58 of 120; 2011 Purdue #60 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #81 of 120; 2011 Illinois #91 of 120; 2011 Indiana #101 of 120; 2011 Penn State #110 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 37 of 120. Big Ten median rank 58.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Illinois #8 of 120; 2011 Michigan #11 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #20 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #23 of 120; 2011 Penn State #24 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #62 of 120; 2011 Purdue #75 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #78 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #81 of 120; 2011 Indiana #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 6 of 120. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Penn State #5 of 120; 2011 Michigan #6 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #13 of 120; 2011 Illinois #15 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #27 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #42 of 120; 2011 Iowa #46 of 120; 2011 Purdue #63 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #66 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #93 of 120; 2011 Indiana #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 10 of 120. Big Ten median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #57
Point margin. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2011 Michigan #13 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #42 of 120; 2011 Iowa #55 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #57 of 120; 2011 Illinois #59 of 120; 2011 Penn State #61 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #66 of 120; 2011 Purdue #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #108 of 120; 2011 Indiana #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 17 of 120. Big Ten median rank 57.
Turnover marginmedian #47
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #3 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #28 of 120; 2011 Michigan #32 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #47 of 120; 2011 Purdue #47 of 120; 2011 Penn State #53 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #61 of 120; 2011 Indiana #79 of 120; 2011 Illinois #91 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #101 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 27 of 120. Big Ten median rank 47.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #16 of 120; 2011 Illinois #20 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #27 of 120; 2011 Purdue #39 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #42 of 120; 2011 Penn State #45 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #55 of 120; 2011 Michigan #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #89 of 120; 2011 Iowa #94 of 120; 2011 Indiana #105 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 33 of 120. Big Ten median rank 42.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Michigan State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #61
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2011 Iowa #21 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #22 of 120; 2011 Michigan #39 of 120; 2011 Indiana #57 of 120; 2011 Purdue #61 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #64 of 120; 2011 Illinois #68 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #84 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #90 of 120; 2011 Penn State #99 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 80 of 120. Big Ten median rank 61.
Defensive EPAmedian #48
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Illinois #12 of 120; 2011 Penn State #32 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #35 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #38 of 120; 2011 Michigan #48 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #66 of 120; 2011 Iowa #76 of 120; 2011 Purdue #78 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #108 of 120; 2011 Indiana #109 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #112 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 4 of 120. Big Ten median rank 48.
Offensive success ratemedian #57
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #11 of 120; 2011 Michigan #41 of 120; 2011 Iowa #48 of 120; 2011 Purdue #52 of 120; 2011 Illinois #57 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #88 of 120; 2011 Penn State #92 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #96 of 120; 2011 Indiana #102 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 71 of 120. Big Ten median rank 57.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Illinois #15 of 120; 2011 Penn State #28 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #32 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #35 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #39 of 120; 2011 Iowa #70 of 120; 2011 Michigan #72 of 120; 2011 Purdue #80 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #87 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #98 of 120; 2011 Indiana #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 2 of 120. Big Ten median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Indiana #20 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2011 Michigan #36 of 120; 2011 Purdue #47 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #59 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #67 of 120; 2011 Iowa #72 of 120; 2011 Penn State #75 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #77 of 120; 2011 Illinois #98 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 82 of 120. Big Ten median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #54
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Indiana #17 of 120; 2011 Purdue #18 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #39 of 120; 2011 Michigan #47 of 120; 2011 Penn State #54 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #85 of 120; 2011 Illinois #87 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #94 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #113 of 120. Marked: 2011 Michigan State, ranked 98 of 120. Big Ten median rank 54.