THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan State played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State)#62 (of 74 teams · 331.9 yds/g · 3,319 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 315.1 yds/g allowed · 3,151 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 165 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +0.3 /g · +3 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 658.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#31 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #5–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #5–#67. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #19–#112. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #10–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #7–#73. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #6–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #3–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Iowa State · postseason: #18 Mississippi State)#41 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,051 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.9 /g · +119 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:32 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 615.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Purdue6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 457.4 yds/g · 5,032 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 364 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 447.8 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 307 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.2 /g · +57 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:56 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.142 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Maryland5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#45 (of 74 teams · 369.7 yds/g · 3,697 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 409.8 yds/g allowed · 4,098 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 29:07 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 725.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.579 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 464.2 yds/g · 4,642 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 296 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 27:34 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 711.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wisconsin8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 74 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 3,791 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 653.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 74 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 4,055 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:02 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Minnesota7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)#38 (of 74 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 3,423 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 247 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -6.8 /g · -61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:11 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 589.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.294 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Illinois4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 228 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 517.2 yds/g allowed · 4,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 45.6 pts/g allowed · 410 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.2 /g · -182 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 13 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 562.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.397 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Rutgers1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 248.8 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 11.4 pts/g · 114 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 418.4 yds/g allowed · 4,184 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -21.4 /g · -214 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15 in these games · 10 taken, 25 given · -1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 27:53 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 555.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20182018 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #31
Total offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #8 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #22 of 74; 2018 Illinois #29 of 74; 2018 Indiana #31 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2018 Iowa #41 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 62 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Scoring offensemedian #31
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Iowa #20 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2018 Maryland #31 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #32 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 74; 2018 Illinois #39 of 74; 2018 Indiana #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 69 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Iowa #5 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #26 of 74; 2018 Maryland #34 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Purdue #57 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #63 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 8 of 74. Big Ten median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #33
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Iowa #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 Purdue #34 of 74; 2018 Maryland #42 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #57 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #58 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 5 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Point marginmedian #32
Point margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Purdue #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 Maryland #35 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #45 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #67 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 32 of 74. Big Ten median rank 32.
Turnover marginmedian #28
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #2 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Indiana #28 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Purdue #46 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #52 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 37 of 74. Big Ten median rank 28.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #37 of 74; 2018 Purdue #42 of 74; 2018 Maryland #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #59 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #61 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #64 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 18 of 74. Big Ten median rank 37.
Returning passingmedian #50
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #1 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #1 of 130; 2018 Iowa #21 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Maryland #50 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #75 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #126 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 27 of 130. Big Ten median rank 50.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 130; 2018 Purdue #38 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 130; 2018 Illinois #48 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #51 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #91 of 130; 2018 Maryland #98 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 20 of 130. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #68
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #10 of 130; 2018 Maryland #11 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #20 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #68 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Illinois #85 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #121 of 130; 2018 Iowa #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 66 of 130. Big Ten median rank 68.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Maryland #24 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 Iowa #42 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #48 of 130; 2018 Indiana #57 of 130; 2018 Illinois #58 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #60 of 130; 2018 Purdue #71 of 130. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 34 of 130. Big Ten median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #17 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Maryland #28 of 74; 2018 Illinois #33 of 74; 2018 Iowa #35 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #43 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 66 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Maryland #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #29 of 74; 2018 Purdue #41 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #64 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 6 of 74. Big Ten median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #31
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Wisconsin #4 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #10 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Purdue #28 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #29 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Illinois #34 of 74; 2018 Indiana #39 of 74; 2018 Iowa #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74; 2018 Maryland #61 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 67 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Iowa #29 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #39 of 74; 2018 Indiana #42 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #47 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #52 of 74; 2018 Purdue #54 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #57 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 5 of 74. Big Ten median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #40
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #1 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Illinois #28 of 74; 2018 Iowa #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #42 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #72 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 47 of 74. Big Ten median rank 40.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #20
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Iowa #4 of 74; 2018 Purdue #7 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Maryland #20 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Michigan State, ranked 16 of 74. Big Ten median rank 20.