THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan State played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 73 teams · 345.3 yds/g · 3,453 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 185 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 339.8 yds/g allowed · 3,398 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · -6.3 /g · -63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 30:52 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 688.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#72. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#15 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#64. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#25 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #4–#67. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#124. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#104. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #1–#130. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#58. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #3–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#58. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #7–#73. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#64. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #6–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range #2–#71. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2019Minnesota11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Penn State · postseason: #12 Auburn)#15 (of 73 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 4,052 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 311 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 315.9 yds/g allowed · 2,843 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 181 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +14.4 /g · +130 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:35 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 621.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.319 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State, #14 Michigan, #21 Cincinnati)#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 537.0 yds/g · 4,833 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 436 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 239.6 yds/g allowed · 2,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 12.9 pts/g allowed · 116 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +35.6 /g · +320 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 32:26 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 973.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.394 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Iowa10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #18 Minnesota · postseason: #22 USC)#59 (of 73 teams · 332.8 yds/g · 3,328 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 200 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 3,189 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 141 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 31:06 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 637.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 73 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.102 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Notre Dame, #16 Iowa)#27 (of 73 teams · 403.2 yds/g · 4,032 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 332 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 297.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +14.0 /g · +140 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 28:44 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 853.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 73 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Indiana8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 73 teams · 429.3 yds/g · 3,864 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 267 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 394.1 yds/g allowed · 3,547 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 267 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34:37 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 73 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Penn State11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa · postseason: #17 Memphis)#39 (of 73 teams · 379.7 yds/g · 3,797 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 3,388 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 14.9 pts/g allowed · 149 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 73 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 1.316 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Wisconsin10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa, #18 Minnesota)#25 (of 73 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 3,756 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 271 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 331.7 yds/g allowed · 2,985 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 175 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · +10.7 /g · +96 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35:21 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 675.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 73 teams · 0.249 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 47% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 1.188 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.488 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Nebraska5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 73 teams · 418.9 yds/g · 4,189 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 257 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 4,002 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · -4.7 /g · -47 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · -2 in these games · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 29:54 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 729.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 73 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Purdue4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 73 teams · 381.7 yds/g · 4,199 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 279 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 440.1 yds/g allowed · 4,841 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · -4.9 /g · -54 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 14 taken, 18 given · -0.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 27:15 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 607.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 73 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Illinois6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin)#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 286.9 yds/g · 2,582 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 439.8 yds/g allowed · 3,958 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 245 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · -2.4 /g · -22 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:14 /g · 3h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 661.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 73 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Maryland3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 73 teams · 315.9 yds/g · 3,159 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 489.5 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 39.6 pts/g allowed · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · -18.9 /g · -189 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · -8 in these games · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:39 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 703.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 73 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.395 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Northwestern3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 272.3 yds/g · 2,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 12.1 pts/g · 121 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 3,388 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · -14.2 /g · -142 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -9 in these games · 10 taken, 19 given · -0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 29:42 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#107 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 612.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.116 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 226.0 yds/g · 2,260 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 6.7 pts/g · 67 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 445.7 yds/g allowed · 4,457 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -31.8 /g · -318 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -13 in these games · 7 taken, 20 given · -1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 28:39 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 587.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 0.273 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 28% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20192019 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #15 of 73; 2019 Indiana #21 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #24 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #25 of 73; 2019 Michigan #27 of 73; 2019 Purdue #37 of 73; 2019 Penn State #39 of 73; 2019 Iowa #59 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 Illinois #65 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #70 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 55 of 73. Big Ten median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Michigan #10 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #22 of 73; 2019 Indiana #25 of 73; 2019 Penn State #29 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #36 of 73; 2019 Purdue #38 of 73; 2019 Illinois #43 of 73; 2019 Maryland #52 of 73; 2019 Iowa #57 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #70 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 61 of 73. Big Ten median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #15
Total defense. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Michigan #5 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Iowa #9 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #13 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #15 of 73; 2019 Penn State #15 of 73; 2019 Indiana #30 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #34 of 73; 2019 Illinois #49 of 73; 2019 Purdue #50 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #53 of 73; 2019 Maryland #64 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 18 of 73. Big Ten median rank 15.
Scoring defensemedian #25
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #4 of 73; 2019 Iowa #5 of 73; 2019 Penn State #6 of 73; 2019 Michigan #9 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #11 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #13 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #30 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 Indiana #41 of 73; 2019 Purdue #43 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #45 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #64 of 73; 2019 Maryland #67 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 25 of 73. Big Ten median rank 25.
Point marginmedian #30
Point margin. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Michigan #9 of 73; 2019 Penn State #11 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #14 of 73; 2019 Iowa #18 of 73; 2019 Indiana #30 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #42 of 73; 2019 Purdue #44 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #60 of 73; 2019 Maryland #63 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 46 of 73. Big Ten median rank 30.
Turnover marginmedian #27
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Illinois #2 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #3 of 73; 2019 Penn State #13 of 73; 2019 Iowa #16 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #18 of 73; 2019 Indiana #22 of 73; 2019 Michigan #27 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #34 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #44 of 73; 2019 Purdue #52 of 73; 2019 Maryland #62 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #65 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #68 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 55 of 73. Big Ten median rank 27.
Possessionmedian #34
Possession. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Wisconsin #1 of 73; 2019 Indiana #4 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #5 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #13 of 73; 2019 Iowa #23 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #34 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #37 of 73; 2019 Michigan #47 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #50 of 73; 2019 Penn State #51 of 73; 2019 Purdue #63 of 73; 2019 Maryland #70 of 73; 2019 Illinois #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 27 of 73. Big Ten median rank 34.
Returning passingmedian #65
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #1 of 130; 2019 Iowa #29 of 130; 2019 Michigan #30 of 130; 2019 Indiana #32 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #65 of 130; 2019 Maryland #88 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #91 of 130; 2019 Purdue #105 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #107 of 130; 2019 Penn State #113 of 130; 2019 Illinois #117 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 1 of 130. Big Ten median rank 65.
Returning receivingmedian #62
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #2 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #21 of 130; 2019 Illinois #29 of 130; 2019 Indiana #44 of 130; 2019 Maryland #62 of 130; 2019 Michigan #67 of 130; 2019 Purdue #74 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #76 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #80 of 130; 2019 Penn State #83 of 130; 2019 Iowa #103 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #104 of 130. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 17 of 130. Big Ten median rank 62.
Returning rushingmedian #58
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Indiana #5 of 130; 2019 Iowa #8 of 130; 2019 Maryland #46 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 130; 2019 Illinois #63 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #77 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #84 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #93 of 130; 2019 Michigan #112 of 130; 2019 Purdue #129 of 130; 2019 Penn State #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 41 of 130. Big Ten median rank 58.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2019 Penn State #10 of 130; 2019 Michigan #11 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #24 of 130; 2019 Maryland #27 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #33 of 130; 2019 Illinois #37 of 130; 2019 Iowa #43 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #46 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #49 of 130; 2019 Purdue #51 of 130; 2019 Indiana #53 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 130. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 31 of 130. Big Ten median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #3 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #7 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #12 of 73; 2019 Michigan #15 of 73; 2019 Penn State #25 of 73; 2019 Indiana #26 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #45 of 73; 2019 Purdue #49 of 73; 2019 Illinois #57 of 73; 2019 Iowa #60 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #68 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 65 of 73. Big Ten median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #19
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Michigan #6 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Iowa #10 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #15 of 73; 2019 Penn State #16 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #20 of 73; 2019 Illinois #22 of 73; 2019 Purdue #36 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #43 of 73; 2019 Indiana #47 of 73; 2019 Maryland #54 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 19 of 73. Big Ten median rank 19.
Offensive success ratemedian #31
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #7 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #10 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #11 of 73; 2019 Michigan #18 of 73; 2019 Indiana #20 of 73; 2019 Penn State #30 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #31 of 73; 2019 Purdue #43 of 73; 2019 Iowa #52 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 Illinois #67 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #69 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 58 of 73. Big Ten median rank 31.
Defensive success ratemedian #19
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #6 of 73; 2019 Penn State #9 of 73; 2019 Michigan #12 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #17 of 73; 2019 Iowa #19 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #22 of 73; 2019 Illinois #31 of 73; 2019 Indiana #36 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #43 of 73; 2019 Purdue #44 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #61 of 73; 2019 Maryland #64 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 11 of 73. Big Ten median rank 19.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #34
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Maryland #6 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #11 of 73; 2019 Penn State #20 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #23 of 73; 2019 Illinois #26 of 73; 2019 Purdue #29 of 73; 2019 Michigan #34 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #41 of 73; 2019 Indiana #51 of 73; 2019 Iowa #55 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #62 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #66 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 52 of 73. Big Ten median rank 34.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #30
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Iowa #2 of 73; 2019 Maryland #11 of 73; 2019 Michigan #15 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #23 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #24 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #27 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #30 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #31 of 73; 2019 Purdue #33 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 Penn State #46 of 73; 2019 Indiana #55 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Michigan State, ranked 45 of 73. Big Ten median rank 30.