THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Peers are the 67 teams in 2025’s 4 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan State played 10 such games.

Power 4, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Michigan State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 400.3 yds/g allowed · 4,003 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · -9.8 /g · -98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 29:33 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 136 teams · 717.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 67 Power 4 teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 8 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Total defense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#72. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring defense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Point margin: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#37 (Turnover margin: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #3–#74. 8 of 67 in the top 10.)#39 (Possession: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #2–#74. 8 of 67 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning passing: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 6 of 67 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning receiving: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #4–#134. 5 of 67 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#130. 7 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#74. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#73. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #2–#74. 8 of 67 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range #1–#74. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 455.2 yds/g · 4,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 376 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,359 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +29.8 /g · +268 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13 in these games · 19 taken, 6 given · +1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:55 /g · 4h 56m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 4,491 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 358 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 264.5 yds/g allowed · 2,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +20.0 /g · +200 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 30:25 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.350 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#21 (of 74 teams · 404.4 yds/g · 4,044 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 208.9 yds/g allowed · 2,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 8.4 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +25.3 /g · +253 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:10 /g · 5h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.141 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas Tech12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 BYU, #12 BYU, #15 Utah, #21 Houston)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 451.3 yds/g · 4,062 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38.2 pts/g · 344 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.3 yds/g allowed · 2,415 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 11.1 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +27.1 /g · +244 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 22 taken, 11 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:07 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 136 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.184 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Vanderbilt10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 440.1 yds/g · 3,961 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.0 /g · +99 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:34 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.392 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.427 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#25 (of 74 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 281.1 yds/g allowed · 2,811 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.4 /g · +164 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:03 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 447.7 yds/g · 4,029 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 302 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:48 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Washington9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 74 teams · 375.7 yds/g · 3,381 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 136 teams · 720.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#38 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g allowed · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +7.2 /g · +72 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:34 /g · 5h 26m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025BYU12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #15 Utah, #17 Arizona · postseason: #22 Georgia Tech)#27 (of 74 teams · 395.5 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 344.1 yds/g allowed · 3,441 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 200 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.5 /g · +105 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 19 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:16 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 136 teams · 649.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Clemson7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 74 teams · 409.1 yds/g · 4,091 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 3,673 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.3 /g · +53 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:57 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 918.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#22 (of 74 teams · 404.2 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 324.3 yds/g allowed · 2,919 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:04 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Houston10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona)#24 (of 74 teams · 400.7 yds/g · 3,606 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 3,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +2.4 /g · +22 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:46 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 656.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#30 (of 74 teams · 385.8 yds/g · 3,472 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 231 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.9 yds/g allowed · 2,798 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +2.2 /g · +20 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 8 taken, 14 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:12 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 136 teams · 804.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.287 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.297 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#61 (of 74 teams · 320.2 yds/g · 2,882 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g allowed · 2,895 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.9 /g · +35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:35 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#13 (of 74 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arizona9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 74 teams · 396.0 yds/g · 3,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 303 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 314.6 yds/g allowed · 3,146 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +8.5 /g · +85 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 31:14 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 136 teams · 651.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Cincinnati7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 74 teams · 401.6 yds/g · 4,016 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 277 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 436.5 yds/g allowed · 4,365 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 24:35 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 136 teams · 47% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 136 teams · 644.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.309 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Duke9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#20 (of 74 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 3,668 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 309 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 422.3 yds/g allowed · 3,801 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.9 /g · +44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 18 taken, 7 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:45 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 669.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.366 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.382 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 298.9 yds/g · 2,989 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 300.0 yds/g allowed · 3,000 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.8 /g · +98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:48 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Kansas State6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 74 teams · 373.7 yds/g · 3,737 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 394.9 yds/g allowed · 3,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +12 in these games · 25 taken, 13 given · +1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 29:59 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 136 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 705.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 74 teams · 0.211 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.448 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025LSU7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 (of 74 teams · 308.6 yds/g · 2,777 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 170 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 370.0 yds/g allowed · 3,330 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -2.6 /g · -23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 29:23 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 920.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ole Miss13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.3 yds/g · 3,698 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 266 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 375.8 yds/g allowed · 3,006 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +7.9 /g · +63 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:38 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Penn State7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 333.0 yds/g · 2,997 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 249 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 372.2 yds/g allowed · 3,350 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 240 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · +1.0 /g · +9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 6 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 29:12 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 910.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 74 teams · 0.235 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.210 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Tennessee8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.0 yds/g · 4,158 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 421.6 yds/g allowed · 3,794 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +2.7 /g · +24 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:20 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 866.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.315 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Utah11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 468.7 yds/g · 4,687 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 39.9 pts/g · 399 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 385.8 yds/g allowed · 3,858 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 209 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +19.0 /g · +190 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:32 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 707.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.377 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Baylor5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.6 yds/g · 4,946 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 331 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 409.7 yds/g allowed · 4,507 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 34.9 pts/g allowed · 384 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · -4.8 /g · -53 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15 in these games · 7 taken, 22 given · -1.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 28:49 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 136 teams · 726.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 74 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.289 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.154 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 74 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 411.4 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 6 taken, 10 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami, #24 James Madison)#31 (of 74 teams · 380.2 yds/g · 3,422 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 2,870 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +38 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 30:49 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 700.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 74 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 74 teams · 324.2 yds/g · 2,918 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 3,144 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.4 /g · -31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:43 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 136 teams · 678.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 74 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 0.254 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025SMU9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Miami · postseason: #17 Arizona)#16 (of 74 teams · 418.1 yds/g · 4,181 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 325 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 401.8 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.0 /g · +100 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:19 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 136 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 136 teams · 766.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#46 (of 74 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 3,177 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g allowed · 3,387 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 13 taken, 5 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:58 /g · 4h 03m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 3,747 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 323.7 yds/g allowed · 2,913 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arizona State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Texas Tech)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Texas Tech)#28 (of 74 teams · 390.4 yds/g · 3,904 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 347.9 yds/g allowed · 3,479 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · -1.8 /g · -18 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 32:27 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 136 teams · 738.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 74 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.250 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa State8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona, #23 Iowa)#33 (of 74 teams · 376.6 yds/g · 3,766 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 369.9 yds/g allowed · 3,699 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +3.1 /g · +31 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31:50 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 648.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 74 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.202 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 3,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 334.2 yds/g allowed · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +30 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:24 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Nebraska7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g · 3,217 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 343.3 yds/g allowed · 3,433 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -4.5 /g · -45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:33 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 821.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Georgia Tech)#32 (of 74 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,786 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,622 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:31 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 681.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025TCU9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Houston · postseason: #16 USC)#14 (of 74 teams · 419.9 yds/g · 4,619 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 327 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 371.3 yds/g allowed · 4,084 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +46 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 29:26 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 745.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 74 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025UCF5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 74 teams · 356.3 yds/g · 3,563 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 351.3 yds/g allowed · 3,513 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -5.9 /g · -59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 30:19 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#134 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 136 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 74 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.282 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.107 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wake Forest9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#49 (of 74 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 2,734 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 179 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 338.6 yds/g allowed · 2,709 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.0 /g · -32 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 627.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 74 teams · 339.9 yds/g · 3,059 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 386.9 yds/g allowed · 3,482 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -4.1 /g · -37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 10 taken, 10 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 30:13 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 726.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Florida4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas)#56 (of 74 teams · 329.0 yds/g · 3,290 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,056 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -8.2 /g · -82 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 28:52 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 136 teams · 73% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 898.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 0.220 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.110 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Florida State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)#18 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 354.6 yds/g allowed · 3,546 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 828.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Illinois9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#43 (of 74 teams · 364.6 yds/g · 3,646 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 262 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 384.4 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · -1.4 /g · -14 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:11 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 662.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Kansas5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 74 teams · 366.3 yds/g · 3,663 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 4,288 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -4.7 /g · -47 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 7 taken, 11 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 30:10 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#133 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 705.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 74 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 0.281 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.373 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 74 teams · 354.0 yds/g · 3,186 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 179 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 3,923 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -106 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 25:44 /g · 3h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 136 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 699.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 74 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 74 teams · 329.9 yds/g · 3,299 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 193 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 3,881 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -118 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 136 teams · 712.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Auburn5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 74 teams · 345.4 yds/g · 3,109 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 186 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 213 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 11 taken, 7 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 136 teams · 891.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.315 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 263.5 yds/g · 2,635 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 392.2 yds/g allowed · 3,922 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 10 taken, 6 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 28:05 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 136 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 711.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 74 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.235 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Mississippi State5–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 74 teams · 372.2 yds/g · 3,350 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 231 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,150 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -10.2 /g · -92 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 28:14 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 770.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 74 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025NC State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia, #22 Georgia Tech)#36 (of 74 teams · 373.9 yds/g · 3,739 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 445.9 yds/g allowed · 4,459 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -3.7 /g · -37 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:17 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 707.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.407 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025North Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 285.4 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 170 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 356.8 yds/g allowed · 3,568 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -11.5 /g · -115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 7 taken, 14 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:56 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 136 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 136 teams · 753.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 74 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Boston College2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 365.9 yds/g · 3,659 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 458.9 yds/g allowed · 4,589 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -12.9 /g · -129 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 136 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 650.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 74 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Kentucky5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 74 teams · 314.2 yds/g · 2,828 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 18.0 pts/g · 162 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 382.3 yds/g allowed · 3,441 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -106 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 11 taken, 20 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.206 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025South Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 375.0 yds/g allowed · 3,750 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 136 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 136 teams · 833.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025UCLA3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 74 teams · 308.4 yds/g · 3,084 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 185 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 3,843 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.1 /g · -151 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 8 taken, 10 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 766.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 74 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 74 teams · 419.9 yds/g · 3,779 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 256 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 456.0 yds/g allowed · 4,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 353 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -10.8 /g · -97 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -12 in these games · 3 taken, 15 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 29:18 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 136 teams · 772.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.360 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.299 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Colorado3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 305.4 yds/g · 3,054 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 437.4 yds/g allowed · 4,374 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 33.9 pts/g allowed · 339 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.6 /g · -156 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#114 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 755.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.391 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.334 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Rutgers5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 3,508 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 464.4 yds/g allowed · 4,180 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -13.2 /g · -119 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 31:30 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 689.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.406 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Stanford4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 292.3 yds/g · 2,923 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.6 pts/g · 176 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 407.3 yds/g allowed · 4,073 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -12.2 /g · -122 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 11 taken, 15 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 707.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.196 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wisconsin4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 224.8 yds/g · 2,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 9.5 pts/g · 95 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 352.5 yds/g allowed · 3,525 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 3 taken, 14 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 29:46 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 0.226 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Syracuse3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 300.1 yds/g · 3,001 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 149 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 431.2 yds/g allowed · 4,312 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 375 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -22.6 /g · -226 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -12 in these games · 7 taken, 19 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:15 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 727.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025West Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Houston)#53 (of 74 teams · 332.0 yds/g · 3,320 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 206 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 437.8 yds/g allowed · 4,378 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35.0 pts/g allowed · 350 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -14.4 /g · -144 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:10 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 136 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 662.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 0.238 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.421 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oklahoma State1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 274.8 yds/g · 2,748 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 13.1 pts/g · 131 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 437.2 yds/g allowed · 4,372 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 37.4 pts/g allowed · 374 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -24.3 /g · -243 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 29:00 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 136 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 136 teams · 702.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.369 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 330.6 yds/g · 3,306 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 160 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 460.1 yds/g allowed · 4,601 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.5 /g · -205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 9 taken, 20 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:20 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 4, 20252025 Michigan StatePower 4 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Utah #1 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #2 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #5 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #6 of 74; 2025 Baylor #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #9 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #12 of 74; 2025 USC #13 of 74; 2025 TCU #14 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #15 of 74; 2025 SMU #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Florida State #18 of 74; 2025 Clemson #19 of 74; 2025 Duke #20 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #23 of 74; 2025 Houston #24 of 74; 2025 Miami #25 of 74; 2025 Arizona #26 of 74; 2025 BYU #27 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #28 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #29 of 74; 2025 Missouri #30 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #32 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #33 of 74; 2025 Washington #35 of 74; 2025 NC State #36 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #37 of 74; 2025 Alabama #38 of 74; 2025 Michigan #39 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #40 of 74; 2025 Kansas #41 of 74; 2025 Boston College #42 of 74; 2025 Illinois #43 of 74; 2025 UCF #44 of 74; 2025 Maryland #45 of 74; 2025 Texas #46 of 74; 2025 Auburn #48 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #49 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 Penn State #52 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #53 of 74; 2025 Purdue #54 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Florida #56 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #58 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #59 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #62 of 74; 2025 LSU #63 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Colorado #65 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #66 of 74; 2025 Iowa #67 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #70 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #71 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #72 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 51 of 74. Power 4 median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Utah #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #6 of 74; 2025 Duke #7 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #8 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #10 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #11 of 74; 2025 SMU #12 of 74; 2025 Miami #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #16 of 74; 2025 USC #17 of 74; 2025 BYU #18 of 74; 2025 Virginia #19 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 Baylor #21 of 74; 2025 TCU #22 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #23 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #24 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #25 of 74; 2025 NC State #26 of 74; 2025 Houston #27 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #28 of 74; 2025 Penn State #29 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 Alabama #31 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 Iowa #33 of 74; 2025 Washington #34 of 74; 2025 Illinois #35 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Kansas #37 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #38 of 74; 2025 Missouri #38 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 Florida State #41 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #42 of 74; 2025 Michigan #43 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #45 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #46 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #46 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #50 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 UCF #53 of 74; 2025 Auburn #54 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #55 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #58 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #59 of 74; 2025 LSU #61 of 74; 2025 Florida #62 of 74; 2025 UCLA #63 of 74; 2025 Colorado #64 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #64 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74; 2025 Stanford #67 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #70 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #72 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #35
Total defense. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Miami #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Missouri #7 of 74; 2025 Arizona #8 of 74; 2025 Louisville #9 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #12 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Georgia #14 of 74; 2025 Washington #15 of 74; 2025 Michigan #16 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #17 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #18 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #19 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #21 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2025 UCF #23 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #24 of 74; 2025 Florida State #25 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 USC #27 of 74; 2025 Auburn #28 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #31 of 74; 2025 LSU #32 of 74; 2025 TCU #33 of 74; 2025 Penn State #34 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #35 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #36 of 74; 2025 Texas #37 of 74; 2025 Houston #38 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #39 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2025 UCLA #41 of 74; 2025 Illinois #42 of 74; 2025 Utah #43 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #45 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #46 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #47 of 74; 2025 SMU #49 of 74; 2025 Florida #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Baylor #54 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #58 of 74; 2025 Duke #59 of 74; 2025 Kansas #60 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #61 of 74; 2025 Maryland #62 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #63 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #64 of 74; 2025 Colorado #65 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #66 of 74; 2025 NC State #67 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2025 Boston College #69 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #71 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 48 of 74. Power 4 median rank 35.
Scoring defensemedian #36
Scoring defense. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 BYU #11 of 74; 2025 Michigan #12 of 74; 2025 Georgia #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #14 of 74; 2025 LSU #15 of 74; 2025 Arizona #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Clemson #18 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #18 of 74; 2025 SMU #20 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #21 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Missouri #23 of 74; 2025 USC #24 of 74; 2025 Auburn #25 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #27 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #28 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #30 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #31 of 74; 2025 Florida State #33 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #34 of 74; 2025 Houston #35 of 74; 2025 TCU #36 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #37 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #38 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 74; 2025 UCF #40 of 74; 2025 Penn State #41 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2025 Florida #43 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #45 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #48 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #50 of 74; 2025 Duke #51 of 74; 2025 California #52 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #53 of 74; 2025 Stanford #54 of 74; 2025 Kansas #55 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #56 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 NC State #58 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #61 of 74; 2025 Colorado #62 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74; 2025 Baylor #64 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #65 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #67 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #71 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #72 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 60 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Point marginmedian #36
Point margin. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Utah #6 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 74; 2025 Georgia #9 of 74; 2025 BYU #10 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Iowa #12 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #13 of 74; 2025 Arizona #14 of 74; 2025 Virginia #15 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #17 of 74; 2025 USC #18 of 74; 2025 Washington #19 of 74; 2025 Clemson #20 of 74; 2025 Duke #21 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #23 of 74; 2025 TCU #24 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #25 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #27 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #28 of 74; 2025 Michigan #29 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #30 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #31 of 74; 2025 Houston #32 of 74; 2025 Missouri #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #34 of 74; 2025 Penn State #35 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #37 of 74; 2025 Illinois #38 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #39 of 74; 2025 LSU #40 of 74; 2025 Auburn #42 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #43 of 74; 2025 NC State #44 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #45 of 74; 2025 California #46 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #47 of 74; 2025 Kansas #48 of 74; 2025 Baylor #49 of 74; 2025 UCF #50 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #51 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 Florida #54 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #57 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #59 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #61 of 74; 2025 Stanford #62 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #64 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #66 of 74; 2025 UCLA #67 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #68 of 74; 2025 Colorado #69 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #72 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 55 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Turnover marginmedian #37
Turnover margin. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Duke #4 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #6 of 74; 2025 BYU #7 of 74; 2025 LSU #7 of 74; 2025 SMU #7 of 74; 2025 Arizona #10 of 74; 2025 Texas #12 of 74; 2025 Miami #13 of 74; 2025 Oregon #13 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #15 of 74; 2025 Alabama #16 of 74; 2025 Auburn #17 of 74; 2025 Louisville #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #20 of 74; 2025 Illinois #22 of 74; 2025 Iowa #22 of 74; 2025 NC State #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #22 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #26 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 Utah #26 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #26 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 Maryland #31 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #31 of 74; 2025 Michigan #33 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #33 of 74; 2025 USC #33 of 74; 2025 TCU #36 of 74; 2025 California #37 of 74; 2025 Houston #37 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 Georgia #41 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #41 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #41 of 74; 2025 Florida #45 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #48 of 74; 2025 Colorado #48 of 74; 2025 Penn State #50 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #50 of 74; 2025 Washington #50 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #53 of 74; 2025 Kansas #53 of 74; 2025 Stanford #53 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #56 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #57 of 74; 2025 Florida State #57 of 74; 2025 Missouri #59 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #60 of 74; 2025 UCF #60 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #60 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #69 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #72 of 74; 2025 Baylor #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 45 of 74. Power 4 median rank 37.
Possessionmedian #39
Possession. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Miami #3 of 74; 2025 BYU #4 of 74; 2025 Georgia #5 of 74; 2025 Indiana #7 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 74; 2025 Houston #9 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #10 of 74; 2025 Alabama #11 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #12 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #16 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #17 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #19 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2025 Arizona #21 of 74; 2025 Missouri #22 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #23 of 74; 2025 Louisville #24 of 74; 2025 Iowa #25 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #26 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #27 of 74; 2025 Utah #28 of 74; 2025 Oregon #30 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #31 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 UCF #33 of 74; 2025 NC State #34 of 74; 2025 Auburn #35 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Illinois #37 of 74; 2025 Kansas #38 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #39 of 74; 2025 USC #40 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #41 of 74; 2025 Duke #42 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #47 of 74; 2025 TCU #48 of 74; 2025 Michigan #49 of 74; 2025 LSU #50 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Penn State #53 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #54 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Florida #57 of 74; 2025 Baylor #58 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #59 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Colorado #61 of 74; 2025 Boston College #62 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #63 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #65 of 74; 2025 Florida State #66 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #67 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 SMU #70 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #71 of 74; 2025 Texas #72 of 74; 2025 Maryland #73 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Power 4 median rank 39.
Returning passingmedian #68
Returning passing. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #1 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #1 of 136; 2025 Cincinnati #6 of 136; 2025 Kansas #7 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #9 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Iowa State #11 of 136; 2025 TCU #12 of 136; 2025 Arizona #13 of 136; 2025 Arizona State #15 of 136; 2025 Illinois #18 of 136; 2025 Kansas State #18 of 136; 2025 LSU #20 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #26 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Baylor #32 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #33 of 136; 2025 SMU #35 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #38 of 136; 2025 NC State #41 of 136; 2025 Florida #47 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #52 of 136; 2025 Utah #53 of 136; 2025 Boston College #57 of 136; 2025 Houston #59 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 Florida State #65 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #68 of 136; 2025 Washington #69 of 136; 2025 Purdue #71 of 136; 2025 UCF #72 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #75 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 West Virginia #77 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Stanford #80 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Duke #87 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #96 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #97 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 California #100 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #102 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #106 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 BYU #112 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #113 of 136; 2025 Colorado #114 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma State #118 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136; 2025 Maryland #120 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #122 of 136; 2025 Missouri #124 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #124 of 136; 2025 Auburn #127 of 136; 2025 Louisville #127 of 136; 2025 UCLA #127 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 31 of 136. Power 4 median rank 68.
Returning receivingmedian #56
Returning receiving. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Houston #6 of 136; 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Boston College #10 of 136; 2025 Baylor #11 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #13 of 136; 2025 NC State #14 of 136; 2025 Arizona State #16 of 136; 2025 Kansas State #18 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #24 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #26 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #29 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #33 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 UCLA #36 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Louisville #39 of 136; 2025 LSU #42 of 136; 2025 Arizona #44 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #45 of 136; 2025 Auburn #46 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Illinois #48 of 136; 2025 Duke #50 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #52 of 136; 2025 Washington #53 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #54 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 BYU #56 of 136; 2025 Florida #58 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #59 of 136; 2025 SMU #60 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Penn State #62 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Stanford #66 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Iowa State #72 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #74 of 136; 2025 Missouri #76 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #78 of 136; 2025 Cincinnati #80 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #83 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 TCU #87 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #89 of 136; 2025 West Virginia #90 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #91 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #96 of 136; 2025 Florida State #97 of 136; 2025 Colorado #99 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #103 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma State #108 of 136; 2025 Maryland #109 of 136; 2025 Purdue #114 of 136; 2025 California #118 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #127 of 136; 2025 Utah #130 of 136; 2025 Kansas #133 of 136; 2025 UCF #134 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 30 of 136. Power 4 median rank 56.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 Penn State #5 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #7 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Houston #9 of 136; 2025 Washington #10 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #11 of 136; 2025 Iowa State #12 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #14 of 136; 2025 Baylor #15 of 136; 2025 Louisville #16 of 136; 2025 Florida #17 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #19 of 136; 2025 Illinois #20 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 Purdue #28 of 136; 2025 LSU #29 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #35 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #38 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Kansas State #41 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #44 of 136; 2025 Colorado #45 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 Stanford #47 of 136; 2025 Clemson #48 of 136; 2025 Cincinnati #49 of 136; 2025 NC State #51 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #52 of 136; 2025 BYU #53 of 136; 2025 Florida State #54 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #55 of 136; 2025 West Virginia #57 of 136; 2025 Arizona #58 of 136; 2025 TCU #59 of 136; 2025 UCLA #64 of 136; 2025 Kansas #65 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #68 of 136; 2025 Arizona State #69 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 Duke #74 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #77 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma State #79 of 136; 2025 Boston College #81 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #82 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #84 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #87 of 136; 2025 SMU #91 of 136; 2025 Auburn #92 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #94 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #97 of 136; 2025 UCF #99 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Missouri #114 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Utah #119 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #122 of 136; 2025 California #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 63 of 136. Power 4 median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 LSU #6 of 136; 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Penn State #10 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 Florida #12 of 136; 2025 Auburn #13 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #16 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #18 of 136; 2025 Florida State #19 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #20 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #21 of 136; 2025 Missouri #22 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #23 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #24 of 136; 2025 SMU #25 of 136; 2025 UCLA #26 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #27 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #28 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #29 of 136; 2025 Colorado #30 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #31 of 136; 2025 TCU #32 of 136; 2025 Arizona State #33 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #34 of 136; 2025 Baylor #35 of 136; 2025 California #36 of 136; 2025 Washington #37 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Virginia Tech #40 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #41 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 UCF #43 of 136; 2025 Utah #44 of 136; 2025 NC State #45 of 136; 2025 Stanford #46 of 136; 2025 Kansas State #47 of 136; 2025 Kansas #48 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma State #49 of 136; 2025 Louisville #50 of 136; 2025 Maryland #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #53 of 136; 2025 Purdue #54 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #56 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #57 of 136; 2025 Duke #58 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 West Virginia #63 of 136; 2025 Illinois #64 of 136; 2025 Houston #66 of 136; 2025 Arizona #67 of 136; 2025 Boston College #69 of 136; 2025 BYU #70 of 136; 2025 Iowa State #71 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136; 2025 Cincinnati #73 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #74 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 38 of 136. Power 4 median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #4 of 74; 2025 Utah #5 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #7 of 74; 2025 USC #8 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #9 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #10 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #11 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #12 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #13 of 74; 2025 SMU #14 of 74; 2025 Duke #15 of 74; 2025 Washington #16 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #17 of 74; 2025 Miami #18 of 74; 2025 NC State #19 of 74; 2025 Penn State #21 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 BYU #23 of 74; 2025 Florida State #24 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #25 of 74; 2025 Illinois #26 of 74; 2025 Kansas #27 of 74; 2025 Alabama #28 of 74; 2025 Clemson #29 of 74; 2025 Baylor #30 of 74; 2025 Michigan #31 of 74; 2025 TCU #32 of 74; 2025 Virginia #33 of 74; 2025 Missouri #34 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #35 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #37 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #38 of 74; 2025 Louisville #39 of 74; 2025 Arizona #40 of 74; 2025 Iowa #41 of 74; 2025 Texas #43 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #45 of 74; 2025 Maryland #46 of 74; 2025 Florida #47 of 74; 2025 Boston College #48 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #49 of 74; 2025 UCLA #50 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #52 of 74; 2025 UCF #53 of 74; 2025 Houston #55 of 74; 2025 Auburn #56 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #57 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #58 of 74; 2025 LSU #59 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #61 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 Purdue #63 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #64 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #65 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #67 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74; 2025 Colorado #69 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #72 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 42 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #4 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #5 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #8 of 74; 2025 Missouri #9 of 74; 2025 Virginia #10 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Washington #12 of 74; 2025 Iowa #13 of 74; 2025 Louisville #14 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #15 of 74; 2025 Auburn #16 of 74; 2025 Utah #17 of 74; 2025 Alabama #18 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #19 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 BYU #21 of 74; 2025 Clemson #22 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #23 of 74; 2025 LSU #24 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #25 of 74; 2025 TCU #26 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #27 of 74; 2025 Michigan #28 of 74; 2025 Georgia #29 of 74; 2025 Houston #30 of 74; 2025 USC #31 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 74; 2025 UCF #34 of 74; 2025 Texas #35 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 Stanford #37 of 74; 2025 Baylor #38 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #39 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #42 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #44 of 74; 2025 Penn State #46 of 74; 2025 Florida #47 of 74; 2025 Colorado #48 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #49 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #50 of 74; 2025 Maryland #51 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #52 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #54 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #55 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Illinois #57 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2025 NC State #60 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #61 of 74; 2025 Duke #62 of 74; 2025 Kansas #63 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #65 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #72 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 59 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #4 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Oregon #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Washington #8 of 74; 2025 Miami #9 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #10 of 74; 2025 Utah #11 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #13 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 74; 2025 Penn State #16 of 74; 2025 Illinois #17 of 74; 2025 Georgia #18 of 74; 2025 Kansas #19 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 Michigan #21 of 74; 2025 Duke #22 of 74; 2025 Louisville #23 of 74; 2025 Baylor #24 of 74; 2025 Houston #25 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2025 TCU #28 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #29 of 74; 2025 Florida State #30 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #31 of 74; 2025 Clemson #32 of 74; 2025 Alabama #33 of 74; 2025 Arizona #34 of 74; 2025 Iowa #36 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #37 of 74; 2025 Boston College #38 of 74; 2025 NC State #39 of 74; 2025 Missouri #40 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #41 of 74; 2025 SMU #42 of 74; 2025 Florida #43 of 74; 2025 Auburn #45 of 74; 2025 Virginia #47 of 74; 2025 Purdue #48 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #49 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #50 of 74; 2025 UCLA #52 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #53 of 74; 2025 UCF #54 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #55 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #56 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2025 Texas #58 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 LSU #63 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #64 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #65 of 74; 2025 Stanford #66 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #68 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #71 of 74; 2025 Colorado #72 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Power 4 median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Missouri #9 of 74; 2025 Louisville #10 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #12 of 74; 2025 Arizona #13 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #15 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #17 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #18 of 74; 2025 Alabama #19 of 74; 2025 Washington #20 of 74; 2025 Auburn #21 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #22 of 74; 2025 TCU #23 of 74; 2025 BYU #24 of 74; 2025 Georgia #25 of 74; 2025 LSU #26 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 Iowa #28 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 NC State #31 of 74; 2025 Stanford #32 of 74; 2025 California #33 of 74; 2025 Florida State #34 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #35 of 74; 2025 Houston #36 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #37 of 74; 2025 Colorado #38 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #39 of 74; 2025 Kansas #40 of 74; 2025 Michigan #41 of 74; 2025 Penn State #42 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #43 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #44 of 74; 2025 Duke #46 of 74; 2025 UCF #48 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #49 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #50 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #51 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 Baylor #53 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #54 of 74; 2025 Florida #55 of 74; 2025 USC #57 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #59 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #61 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #62 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #63 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #66 of 74; 2025 Illinois #67 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Maryland #70 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #71 of 74; 2025 UCLA #72 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 65 of 74. Power 4 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Kansas State #2 of 74; 2025 SMU #3 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #6 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #7 of 74; 2025 Colorado #8 of 74; 2025 Texas #9 of 74; 2025 Duke #10 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #12 of 74; 2025 NC State #13 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #14 of 74; 2025 Maryland #15 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Florida State #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #18 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #19 of 74; 2025 Oregon #20 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #21 of 74; 2025 Baylor #22 of 74; 2025 USC #23 of 74; 2025 Missouri #24 of 74; 2025 Alabama #25 of 74; 2025 TCU #26 of 74; 2025 UCF #27 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #28 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #29 of 74; 2025 Arizona #30 of 74; 2025 LSU #31 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #32 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #33 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #34 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #35 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Purdue #38 of 74; 2025 Indiana #39 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #41 of 74; 2025 Kansas #42 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2025 Penn State #44 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Boston College #46 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #48 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Louisville #53 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #54 of 74; 2025 Georgia #55 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #57 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #58 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #60 of 74; 2025 BYU #61 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #62 of 74; 2025 Houston #63 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Michigan #65 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #66 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #67 of 74; 2025 Miami #70 of 74; 2025 Florida #71 of 74; 2025 Auburn #72 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #73 of 74; 2025 Iowa #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 49 of 74. Power 4 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #38
Defensive explosiveness. Power 4, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Iowa #2 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #3 of 74; 2025 UCF #4 of 74; 2025 Michigan #5 of 74; 2025 Baylor #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Maryland #10 of 74; 2025 UCLA #12 of 74; 2025 Florida State #13 of 74; 2025 Illinois #14 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #15 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #17 of 74; 2025 Penn State #18 of 74; 2025 Houston #19 of 74; 2025 Georgia #20 of 74; 2025 Louisville #21 of 74; 2025 Cincinnati #22 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #24 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #29 of 74; 2025 BYU #30 of 74; 2025 Arizona #31 of 74; 2025 Virginia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 Florida #33 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #34 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #37 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #39 of 74; 2025 Virginia #40 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #41 of 74; 2025 TCU #42 of 74; 2025 Iowa State #43 of 74; 2025 Alabama #45 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2025 California #47 of 74; 2025 Arizona State #48 of 74; 2025 Purdue #49 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #50 of 74; 2025 Miami #51 of 74; 2025 Indiana #53 of 74; 2025 Missouri #54 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #55 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #56 of 74; 2025 Stanford #57 of 74; 2025 Auburn #58 of 74; 2025 LSU #59 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Clemson #61 of 74; 2025 Colorado #62 of 74; 2025 Kansas State #63 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #64 of 74; 2025 Boston College #65 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma State #66 of 74; 2025 Kansas #67 of 74; 2025 Utah #68 of 74; 2025 Duke #69 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #70 of 74; 2025 NC State #71 of 74; 2025 West Virginia #72 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 11 of 74. Power 4 median rank 38.