Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006New Mexico State480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 475.2 yds/g · 5,702 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 374 points)#101 (of 119 teams · 389.4 yds/g allowed · 4,673 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#63 (of 119 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#112 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 24 taken, 37 given · -1.08 /g)#32 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#95 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.089 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #2–#114. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #14–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#97 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #20–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#49 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #8–#112. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #32–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#64 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#119. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#92 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #35–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#43 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #39–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #2–#119. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #7–#116. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2006Boise State1300 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 420.6 yds/g · 5,468 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 516 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 284.0 yds/g allowed · 3,692 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:34 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 119 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Fresno State480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 4,058 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#90 (of 119 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#86 (of 119 teams · -5.3 /g · -63 on the season)#80 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.33 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#72 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.985 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Hawai'i1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 394.4 yds/g · 5,521 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 280.1 yds/g allowed · 3,921 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.8 /g · +319 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.21 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 10:51 /g · 2h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 55% of plays successful)#113 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Idaho480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#103 (of 119 teams · 282.4 yds/g · 3,389 yards)#103 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g · 203 points)#75 (of 119 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,158 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#114 (of 119 teams · -17.8 /g · -214 on the season)#49 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 27 taken, 25 given · +0.17 /g)#117 (of 119 teams · 16:05 /g · 3h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#93 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 119 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Louisiana Tech3100 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 344.5 yds/g · 4,479 yards)#95 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 242 points)#119 (of 119 teams · 483.2 yds/g allowed · 6,282 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 41.7 pts/g allowed · 542 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -23.1 /g · -300 on the season)#106 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 29 taken, 40 given · -0.85 /g)#64 (of 119 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 119 teams · -0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#119 (of 119 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Nevada850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 119 teams · 321.6 yds/g · 4,181 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 391 points)#16 (of 119 teams · 280.9 yds/g allowed · 3,652 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 249 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +10.9 /g · +142 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 36 taken, 24 given · +0.92 /g)#77 (of 119 teams · 17:51 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#57 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.782 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006San José State940 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 357.2 yds/g · 4,644 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 324 points)#83 (of 119 teams · 354.9 yds/g allowed · 4,614 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#46 (of 119 teams · +4.2 /g · +54 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 30 taken, 21 given · +0.69 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:56 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#89 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 119 teams · 0.859 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Utah State1110 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 119 teams · 246.3 yds/g · 2,955 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 10.8 pts/g · 130 points)#110 (of 119 teams · 402.6 yds/g allowed · 4,831 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 462 points)#118 (of 119 teams · -27.7 /g · -332 on the season)#69 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#98 (of 119 teams · 17:19 /g · 3h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 119 teams · -0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 119 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 119 teams · 29% of plays successful)#117 (of 119 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.531 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20062006 New Mexico StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #17 of 119; 2006 San José State #44 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #56 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #59 of 119; 2006 Nevada #74 of 119; 2006 Idaho #103 of 119; 2006 Utah State #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 2 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #55
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 Nevada #20 of 119; 2006 San José State #55 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #64 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #95 of 119; 2006 Idaho #103 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 15 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 55.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #14 of 119; 2006 Nevada #16 of 119; 2006 Boise State #18 of 119; 2006 Idaho #75 of 119; 2006 San José State #83 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #90 of 119; 2006 Utah State #110 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 101 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #97
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #20 of 119; 2006 Nevada #30 of 119; 2006 San José State #46 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #69 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #97 of 119; 2006 Idaho #115 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 105 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 97.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 Nevada #20 of 119; 2006 San José State #46 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2006 Idaho #114 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #117 of 119; 2006 Utah State #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 63 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #49
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 Nevada #9 of 119; 2006 San José State #20 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #48 of 119; 2006 Idaho #49 of 119; 2006 Utah State #69 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #80 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #106 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 49.
Possessionmedian #72
Possession. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #43 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #48 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #64 of 119; 2006 San José State #72 of 119; 2006 Nevada #77 of 119; 2006 Utah State #98 of 119; 2006 Idaho #117 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 32 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 72.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #64
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #11 of 119; 2006 San José State #43 of 119; 2006 Idaho #64 of 119; 2006 Nevada #88 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #99 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #117 of 119; 2006 Utah State #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 3 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 64.
Defensive EPAmedian #92
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #35 of 119; 2006 Nevada #78 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #90 of 119; 2006 San José State #91 of 119; 2006 Idaho #92 of 119; 2006 Utah State #115 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #116 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 92.
Offensive success ratemedian #43
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #9 of 119; 2006 San José State #35 of 119; 2006 Nevada #43 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #108 of 119; 2006 Idaho #109 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #110 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 17 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 43.
Defensive success ratemedian #93
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #39 of 119; 2006 Nevada #57 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #72 of 119; 2006 San José State #89 of 119; 2006 Idaho #93 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #113 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 95 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #58
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Fresno State #2 of 119; 2006 Idaho #19 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #50 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #58 of 119; 2006 Boise State #87 of 119; 2006 San José State #101 of 119; 2006 Nevada #116 of 119; 2006 Utah State #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 5 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 58.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Utah State #7 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #16 of 119; 2006 Idaho #37 of 119; 2006 San José State #39 of 119; 2006 Boise State #40 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #73 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2006 Nevada #104 of 119. Marked: 2006 New Mexico State, ranked 116 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 40.