Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005New Mexico State0120 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 119 teams · 344.4 yds/g · 4,133 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 480.3 yds/g allowed · 5,764 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 465 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -22.3 /g · -267 on the season)#119 (of 119 teams · -27 on the season · 14 taken, 41 given · -2.25 /g)#107 (of 119 teams · 15:59 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 119 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#110 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #9–#99. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#109. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #19–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#104 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #32–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#85 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #9–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#74 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#48 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #5–#107. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#98 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #7–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#99 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #18–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#89 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #23–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #10–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #3–#93. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2005Boise State940 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 424.9 yds/g · 5,524 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.1 pts/g · 469 points)#59 (of 119 teams · 369.7 yds/g allowed · 4,806 yards)#51 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +11.7 /g · +152 on the season)#90 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 29 taken, 35 given · -0.46 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:14 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 119 teams · 1.035 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Fresno State850 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 384.1 yds/g · 4,994 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#19 (of 119 teams · 309.1 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#86 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.38 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 16:28 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#51 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Hawai'i570 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 476.2 yds/g · 5,714 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 368 points)#106 (of 119 teams · 438.4 yds/g allowed · 5,261 yards)#112 (of 119 teams · 35.7 pts/g allowed · 428 points)#85 (of 119 teams · -5.0 /g · -60 on the season)#47 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.17 /g)#44 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#116 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 119 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.983 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Idaho290 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 119 teams · 335.6 yds/g · 3,692 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 243 points)#102 (of 119 teams · 421.0 yds/g allowed · 4,631 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 419 points)#110 (of 119 teams · -16.0 /g · -176 on the season)#92 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 22 taken, 29 given · -0.64 /g)#31 (of 119 teams · 18:46 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 119 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 119 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.831 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Louisiana Tech740 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 366.6 yds/g · 4,033 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 316 points)#72 (of 119 teams · 381.3 yds/g allowed · 4,194 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#49 (of 119 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.36 /g)#19 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 119 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Nevada930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 119 teams · 449.3 yds/g · 5,392 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 410 points)#93 (of 119 teams · 410.6 yds/g allowed · 4,927 yards)#103 (of 119 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#52 (of 119 teams · +2.3 /g · +27 on the season)#56 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.164 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#101 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.992 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 119 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005San José State380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 119 teams · 345.4 yds/g · 3,800 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 248 points)#109 (of 119 teams · 441.4 yds/g allowed · 4,855 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#99 (of 119 teams · -9.9 /g · -109 on the season)#50 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.09 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 16:32 /g · 3h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 119 teams · -0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 119 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 119 teams · 28% of plays successful)#89 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Utah State380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 119 teams · 317.0 yds/g · 3,487 yards)#100 (of 119 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 208 points)#86 (of 119 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,462 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#107 (of 119 teams · -13.8 /g · -152 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.27 /g)#52 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 119 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#93 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.992 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20052005 New Mexico StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Hawai'i #9 of 119; 2005 Nevada #13 of 119; 2005 Boise State #24 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #56 of 119; 2005 San José State #77 of 119; 2005 Idaho #83 of 119; 2005 Utah State #99 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 78 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #6 of 119; 2005 Boise State #9 of 119; 2005 Nevada #15 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #35 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #46 of 119; 2005 San José State #82 of 119; 2005 Idaho #85 of 119; 2005 Utah State #100 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 109 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #93
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Boise State #59 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #72 of 119; 2005 Utah State #86 of 119; 2005 Nevada #93 of 119; 2005 Idaho #102 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #106 of 119; 2005 San José State #109 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 118 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Scoring defensemedian #104
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #32 of 119; 2005 Boise State #51 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #58 of 119; 2005 Nevada #103 of 119; 2005 San José State #104 of 119; 2005 Utah State #105 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #112 of 119; 2005 Idaho #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 116 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 104.
Point marginmedian #85
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #9 of 119; 2005 Boise State #18 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #49 of 119; 2005 Nevada #52 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #85 of 119; 2005 San José State #99 of 119; 2005 Utah State #107 of 119; 2005 Idaho #110 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 85.
Turnover marginmedian #74
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Louisiana Tech #6 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #47 of 119; 2005 San José State #50 of 119; 2005 Nevada #56 of 119; 2005 Utah State #74 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2005 Boise State #90 of 119; 2005 Idaho #92 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 119 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 74.
Possessionmedian #48
Possession. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Nevada #5 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #19 of 119; 2005 Idaho #31 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #44 of 119; 2005 Boise State #48 of 119; 2005 Utah State #52 of 119; 2005 San José State #95 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #96 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 107 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 48.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #98
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Hawai'i #7 of 119; 2005 Nevada #8 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Boise State #51 of 119; 2005 Utah State #98 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #100 of 119; 2005 Idaho #113 of 119; 2005 San José State #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 99 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 98.
Defensive EPAmedian #99
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Boise State #18 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Idaho #68 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #71 of 119; 2005 Utah State #99 of 119; 2005 San José State #110 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #113 of 119; 2005 Nevada #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 107 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 99.
Offensive success ratemedian #73
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Nevada #6 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #12 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #39 of 119; 2005 Boise State #48 of 119; 2005 Utah State #73 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #83 of 119; 2005 Idaho #100 of 119; 2005 San José State #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 104 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Defensive success ratemedian #89
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Boise State #23 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #46 of 119; 2005 Idaho #50 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #51 of 119; 2005 San José State #89 of 119; 2005 Utah State #93 of 119; 2005 Nevada #101 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 110 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 89.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 San José State #10 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #23 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #24 of 119; 2005 Boise State #38 of 119; 2005 Nevada #66 of 119; 2005 Utah State #76 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #104 of 119; 2005 Idaho #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 17 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #56
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Boise State #39 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #46 of 119; 2005 Utah State #52 of 119; 2005 Idaho #56 of 119; 2005 San José State #64 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #67 of 119; 2005 Nevada #75 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #93 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 3 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.