Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015New Mexico State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 128 teams · 433.3 yds/g · 5,200 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points)#125 (of 128 teams · 522.4 yds/g allowed · 6,269 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 45.0 pts/g allowed · 540 points)#119 (of 128 teams · -16.4 /g · -197 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#103 (of 128 teams · 28:04 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 251.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 128 teams · 0.291 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#113 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.467 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 128 teams · 1.304 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Sun Belt teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #26–#123. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#70 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #12–#111. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#89 (Total defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #11–#125. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#94 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #14–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#94 (Point margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #9–#119. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#75 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #23–#124. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#83 (Possession: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #4–#123. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning passing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #1–#114. 3 of 11 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning receiving: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #5–#117. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning rushing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #10–#119. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#111 (Team talent: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #79–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #25–#110. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#78 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #4–#125. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#80 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #23–#123. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #18–#125. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#63 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #1–#128. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#87 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #7–#124. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)
2015App State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 128 teams · 467.3 yds/g · 6,075 yards)#23 (of 128 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 477 points)#11 (of 128 teams · 314.5 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 248 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +17.6 /g · +229 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#38 (of 128 teams · 31:17 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 312.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 128 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#18 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.064 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Arkansas State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 128 teams · 438.5 yds/g · 5,700 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 40.0 pts/g · 520 points)#89 (of 128 teams · 419.2 yds/g allowed · 5,450 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#33 (of 128 teams · +9.8 /g · +127 on the season)#23 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 34 taken, 26 given · +0.62 /g)#51 (of 128 teams · 30:27 /g · 6h 36m on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 408.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#22 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.203 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.403 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Georgia Southern940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 128 teams · 426.4 yds/g · 5,543 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 474 points)#21 (of 128 teams · 338.7 yds/g allowed · 4,403 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#24 (of 128 teams · +12.9 /g · +168 on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 27 taken, 21 given · +0.46 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:59 /g · 7h 22m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 391.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#59 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 128 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 128 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Georgia State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 128 teams · 432.9 yds/g · 5,627 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#74 (of 128 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 5,273 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#82 (of 128 teams · -1.4 /g · -18 on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#83 (of 128 teams · 29:02 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 335.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 128 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.325 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.070 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Idaho480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 128 teams · 429.1 yds/g · 5,149 yards)#57 (of 128 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 364 points)#118 (of 128 teams · 485.8 yds/g allowed · 5,829 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 42.1 pts/g allowed · 505 points)#109 (of 128 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#104 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.50 /g)#30 (of 128 teams · 31:38 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#62 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 262.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 128 teams · 0.333 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#125 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 128 teams · 1.004 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Louisiana480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#77 (of 128 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 4,565 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#90 (of 128 teams · 420.8 yds/g allowed · 5,050 yards)#94 (of 128 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#94 (of 128 teams · -5.4 /g · -65 on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 11 taken, 20 given · -0.75 /g)#58 (of 128 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 430.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 128 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#42 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 128 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.400 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015South Alabama570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#101 (of 128 teams · 360.2 yds/g · 4,322 yards)#93 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#84 (of 128 teams · 416.0 yds/g allowed · 4,992 yards)#115 (of 128 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 447 points)#110 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#100 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.42 /g)#94 (of 128 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 41m on the season)#90 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's passing production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 367.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 128 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 128 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#91 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 128 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Texas State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 128 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 4,977 yards)#80 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 323 points)#124 (of 128 teams · 521.8 yds/g allowed · 6,262 yards)#120 (of 128 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 470 points)#110 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.58 /g)#85 (of 128 teams · 28:57 /g · 5h 47m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#60 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 360.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#121 (of 128 teams · 0.303 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#114 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 128 teams · 1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Troy480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 128 teams · 359.9 yds/g · 4,319 yards)#70 (of 128 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 335 points)#57 (of 128 teams · 391.3 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#76 (of 128 teams · -0.3 /g · -4 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#123 (of 128 teams · 26:17 /g · 5h 15m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 335.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 128 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 128 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.148 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.114 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UL Monroe2110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#123 (of 128 teams · 310.9 yds/g · 4,041 yards)#111 (of 128 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 273 points)#93 (of 128 teams · 422.8 yds/g allowed · 5,496 yards)#113 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 475 points)#117 (of 128 teams · -15.5 /g · -202 on the season)#124 (of 128 teams · -16 on the season · 14 taken, 30 given · -1.23 /g)#106 (of 128 teams · 27:52 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#123 (of 128 teams · 292.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 128 teams · 35% of plays successful)#53 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20152015 New Mexico StateSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #26 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #37 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #43 of 128; 2015 Idaho #44 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #46 of 128; 2015 Texas State #54 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #77 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #101 of 128; 2015 Troy #102 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 42 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #70
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #12 of 128; 2015 App State #23 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #25 of 128; 2015 Idaho #57 of 128; 2015 Troy #70 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #79 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #93 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #111 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 66 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Total defensemedian #89
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #11 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #21 of 128; 2015 Troy #57 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #74 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #84 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #89 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #90 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #93 of 128; 2015 Idaho #118 of 128; 2015 Texas State #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 125 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 89.
Scoring defensemedian #94
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #14 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #38 of 128; 2015 Troy #78 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #79 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #86 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #94 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #113 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #115 of 128; 2015 Texas State #120 of 128; 2015 Idaho #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 126 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 94.
Point marginmedian #94
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #9 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #24 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #33 of 128; 2015 Troy #76 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #82 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #94 of 128; 2015 Idaho #109 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #110 of 128; 2015 Texas State #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 119 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 94.
Turnover marginmedian #75
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #23 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #31 of 128; 2015 App State #51 of 128; 2015 Troy #66 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #75 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #100 of 128; 2015 Idaho #104 of 128; 2015 Texas State #105 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 58 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Possessionmedian #83
Possession. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Georgia Southern #4 of 128; 2015 Idaho #30 of 128; 2015 App State #38 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #51 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #58 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #83 of 128; 2015 Texas State #85 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #94 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #106 of 128; 2015 Troy #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 103 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 83.
Returning passingmedian #44
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Georgia Southern #1 of 128; 2015 Texas State #7 of 128; 2015 Troy #21 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #37 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #44 of 128; 2015 App State #61 of 128; 2015 Idaho #62 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #90 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 1 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 44.
Returning receivingmedian #64
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #5 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #6 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #30 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #53 of 128; 2015 Texas State #60 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #64 of 128; 2015 Troy #68 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #100 of 128; 2015 Idaho #115 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 64 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 64.
Returning rushingmedian #48
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #10 of 128; 2015 App State #11 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #41 of 128; 2015 Texas State #47 of 128; 2015 Troy #48 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #78 of 128; 2015 Idaho #90 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #101 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #104 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 31 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 48.
Team talentmedian #111
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Louisiana #79 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #84 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #93 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #102 of 128; 2015 Texas State #103 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #111 of 128; 2015 Troy #112 of 128; 2015 App State #120 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128; 2015 Idaho #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 126 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 111.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #25 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #30 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #55 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #64 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #73 of 128; 2015 Idaho #78 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Troy #98 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #107 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #110 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 77 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #78
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #4 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #51 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #54 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #61 of 128; 2015 Troy #74 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #78 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #100 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #105 of 128; 2015 Texas State #121 of 128; 2015 Idaho #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 120 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 78.
Offensive success ratemedian #80
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #23 of 128; 2015 Idaho #24 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #46 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #51 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #75 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #82 of 128; 2015 Troy #83 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #106 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 116 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 80.
Defensive success ratemedian #85
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #18 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #22 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #42 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #53 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #59 of 128; 2015 Troy #85 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #86 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #91 of 128; 2015 Texas State #114 of 128; 2015 Idaho #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 113 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 85.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #63
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Georgia State #6 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #20 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #26 of 128; 2015 App State #52 of 128; 2015 Texas State #63 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #66 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #79 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2015 Troy #89 of 128; 2015 Idaho #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 1 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 63.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #87
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #7 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #10 of 128; 2015 Troy #26 of 128; 2015 Georgia Southern #58 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #85 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #87 of 128; 2015 Idaho #106 of 128; 2015 Texas State #111 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #122 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 New Mexico State, ranked 108 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 87.