Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016New Mexico State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 128 teams · 414.7 yds/g · 4,976 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#121 (of 128 teams · 496.7 yds/g allowed · 5,960 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 466 points)#123 (of 128 teams · -14.0 /g · -168 on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#118 (of 128 teams · 26:35 /g · 5h 19m on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 128 teams · 267.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.104 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 128 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#94 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 128 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 128 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Sun Belt teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#90 (Total offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #52–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#92 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #39–#124. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#53 (Total defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #17–#121. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #9–#125. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#79 (Point margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #24–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#54 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #10–#123. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#71 (Possession: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #7–#121. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning passing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #1–#127. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#95 (Returning receiving: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #30–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning rushing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #13–#114. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#112 (Team talent: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #76–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#98 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #57–#125. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #9–#117. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#83 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #44–#124. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #9–#124. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#75 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #17–#124. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range #1–#123. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)
2016App State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 128 teams · 429.9 yds/g · 5,589 yards)#64 (of 128 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#17 (of 128 teams · 329.7 yds/g allowed · 4,286 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 232 points)#25 (of 128 teams · +11.4 /g · +148 on the season)#19 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.62 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:36 /g · 7h 17m on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#119 (of 128 teams · 333.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 128 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#21 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 128 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Arkansas State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#92 (of 128 teams · 379.4 yds/g · 4,932 yards)#74 (of 128 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 355 points)#29 (of 128 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,717 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#47 (of 128 teams · +5.8 /g · +76 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#78 (of 128 teams · 29:02 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#127 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#107 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#76 (of 128 teams · 471.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 128 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 128 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 128 teams · 1.153 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Georgia Southern570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#90 (of 128 teams · 379.8 yds/g · 4,558 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points)#58 (of 128 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,759 yards)#52 (of 128 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#68 (of 128 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#18 (of 128 teams · 32:39 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#107 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 435.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 128 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#65 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Georgia State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#119 (of 128 teams · 333.9 yds/g · 4,007 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 239 points)#46 (of 128 teams · 380.7 yds/g allowed · 4,568 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 319 points)#100 (of 128 teams · -6.7 /g · -80 on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.42 /g)#121 (of 128 teams · 26:28 /g · 5h 18m on the season)#119 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#122 (of 128 teams · 321.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 128 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 128 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#122 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#77 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 128 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Idaho940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#74 (of 128 teams · 397.3 yds/g · 5,165 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 400 points)#78 (of 128 teams · 427.6 yds/g allowed · 5,559 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 407 points)#71 (of 128 teams · -0.5 /g · -7 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 28 taken, 17 given · +0.85 /g)#27 (of 128 teams · 32:04 /g · 6h 57m on the season)#63 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#113 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 256.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 128 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 128 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#107 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.038 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Louisiana670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#108 (of 128 teams · 356.5 yds/g · 4,634 yards)#109 (of 128 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 307 points)#43 (of 128 teams · 379.1 yds/g allowed · 4,928 yards)#46 (of 128 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#80 (of 128 teams · -1.7 /g · -22 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.08 /g)#67 (of 128 teams · 29:42 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's passing production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 421.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 128 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#44 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.060 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 128 teams · 1.159 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016South Alabama670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#82 (of 128 teams · 388.3 yds/g · 5,048 yards)#92 (of 128 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 330 points)#53 (of 128 teams · 389.9 yds/g allowed · 5,068 yards)#56 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#79 (of 128 teams · -1.6 /g · -21 on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.15 /g)#71 (of 128 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#104 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 389.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 128 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 128 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#78 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#71 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.188 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Texas State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#126 (of 128 teams · 305.5 yds/g · 3,666 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 223 points)#117 (of 128 teams · 470.3 yds/g allowed · 5,644 yards)#125 (of 128 teams · 41.1 pts/g allowed · 493 points)#128 (of 128 teams · -22.5 /g · -270 on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · -14 on the season · 11 taken, 25 given · -1.17 /g)#117 (of 128 teams · 26:43 /g · 5h 21m on the season)#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#128 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's receiving production returning)#105 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 351.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 128 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 128 teams · 0.253 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#124 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#108 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.185 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Troy1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 128 teams · 429.6 yds/g · 5,585 yards)#39 (of 128 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#35 (of 128 teams · 366.5 yds/g allowed · 4,765 yards)#21 (of 128 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#24 (of 128 teams · +11.6 /g · +151 on the season)#12 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 30 taken, 20 given · +0.77 /g)#45 (of 128 teams · 30:57 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 390.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 128 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#16 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 128 teams · 1.073 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.381 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016UL Monroe480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#100 (of 128 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 4,480 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 280 points)#120 (of 128 teams · 483.5 yds/g allowed · 5,802 yards)#122 (of 128 teams · 39.1 pts/g allowed · 469 points)#124 (of 128 teams · -15.8 /g · -189 on the season)#122 (of 128 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#72 (of 128 teams · 29:27 /g · 5h 53m on the season)#68 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 322.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.266 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#124 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 128 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 128 teams · 1.180 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20162016 New Mexico StateSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #90
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #52 of 128; 2016 Troy #53 of 128; 2016 Idaho #74 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #82 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #90 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #92 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #100 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #108 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #119 of 128; 2016 Texas State #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 64 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 90.
Scoring offensemedian #92
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Troy #39 of 128; 2016 Idaho #54 of 128; 2016 App State #64 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #74 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #78 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #92 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #109 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #110 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #121 of 128; 2016 Texas State #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 97 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 92.
Total defensemedian #53
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #17 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #29 of 128; 2016 Troy #35 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #43 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #46 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #53 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #58 of 128; 2016 Idaho #78 of 128; 2016 Texas State #117 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #120 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 121 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 53.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #9 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #19 of 128; 2016 Troy #21 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #46 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #52 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #54 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #56 of 128; 2016 Idaho #86 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #122 of 128; 2016 Texas State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 121 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #79
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Troy #24 of 128; 2016 App State #25 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #47 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #68 of 128; 2016 Idaho #71 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #79 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #80 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #100 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #124 of 128; 2016 Texas State #128 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 123 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 79.
Turnover marginmedian #54
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Idaho #10 of 128; 2016 Troy #12 of 128; 2016 App State #19 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #34 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #54 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #58 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #79 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #97 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #122 of 128; 2016 Texas State #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 54 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 54.
Possessionmedian #71
Possession. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #7 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #18 of 128; 2016 Idaho #27 of 128; 2016 Troy #45 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #67 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #71 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #72 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #78 of 128; 2016 Texas State #117 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 118 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Returning passingmedian #68
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Southern #1 of 128; 2016 Texas State #12 of 128; 2016 App State #37 of 128; 2016 Idaho #63 of 128; 2016 Troy #66 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #68 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #104 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #119 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 79 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 68.
Returning receivingmedian #95
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia State #30 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #39 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #41 of 128; 2016 Idaho #74 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #91 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #95 of 128; 2016 App State #99 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #107 of 128; 2016 Troy #109 of 128; 2016 Texas State #128 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 95.
Returning rushingmedian #69
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Southern #13 of 128; 2016 App State #18 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #32 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #61 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #69 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #99 of 128; 2016 Texas State #105 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #107 of 128; 2016 Idaho #113 of 128; 2016 Troy #114 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 45 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 69.
Team talentmedian #112
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas State #76 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #86 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #88 of 128; 2016 Troy #100 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #102 of 128; 2016 Texas State #112 of 128; 2016 App State #119 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #121 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #122 of 128; 2016 Idaho #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 125 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 112.
Offensive EPAmedian #98
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #57 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #65 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #85 of 128; 2016 Idaho #94 of 128; 2016 Troy #95 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #98 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #105 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #111 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #117 of 128; 2016 Texas State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 99 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 98.
Defensive EPAmedian #58
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas State #9 of 128; 2016 App State #13 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #29 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #32 of 128; 2016 Troy #38 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #58 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #64 of 128; 2016 Idaho #88 of 128; 2016 Texas State #116 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 95 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 58.
Offensive success ratemedian #83
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 App State #44 of 128; 2016 Idaho #49 of 128; 2016 Troy #67 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #74 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #78 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #100 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #112 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #122 of 128; 2016 Texas State #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 93 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 83.
Defensive success ratemedian #71
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas State #9 of 128; 2016 Troy #16 of 128; 2016 App State #21 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #44 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #65 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #71 of 128; 2016 Georgia State #77 of 128; 2016 Idaho #107 of 128; 2016 Texas State #108 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 94 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #75
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia State #17 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #43 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #68 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #73 of 128; 2016 Texas State #75 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #95 of 128; 2016 App State #97 of 128; 2016 Troy #120 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #122 of 128; 2016 Idaho #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 44 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #48
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia State #1 of 128; 2016 App State #21 of 128; 2016 Arkansas State #37 of 128; 2016 Texas State #40 of 128; 2016 Louisiana #44 of 128; 2016 Idaho #48 of 128; 2016 South Alabama #52 of 128; 2016 UL Monroe #56 of 128; 2016 Georgia Southern #79 of 128; 2016 Troy #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 New Mexico State, ranked 82 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 48.