THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. New Mexico State played 1 such game.

FBS Independents, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018New Mexico State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (271.0 yds/g · 271 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (522.0 yds/g allowed · 522 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48.0 pts/g allowed · 48 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-38.0 /g · -38 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:26 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#100 (of 130 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 249.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.352 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#11 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#69. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#11 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#56. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#11 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#22. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#6 — top 10 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #6–#28. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#3 — top 10 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #3–#46. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#14 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #14–#25. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#25 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #25–#46. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#100. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#84 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #17–#109. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #2–#122. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#99 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#130. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#10 — top 10 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#50. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#9 — top 10 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #9–#50. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #23–#40. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#8 — top 10 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #8–#55. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#19 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #19–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#5 — top 10 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #5–#12. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)
2018Notre Dame12–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan, #20 Syracuse, #22 Northwestern)#11 (of 74 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 4,475 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 3,285 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 169 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.8 /g · +168 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 847.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Massachusetts4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (352.5 yds/g · 705 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 48 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (661.5 yds/g allowed · 1,323 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (60.5 pts/g allowed · 121 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-36.5 /g · -73 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:11 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 388.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.542 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Army11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (372.0 yds/g · 744 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.5 pts/g · 35 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (368.0 yds/g allowed · 736 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-13.5 /g · -27 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40:24 /g · 1h 21m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#90 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 230.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.408 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (58% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018BYU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 308.2 yds/g · 1,541 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 104 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 375.6 yds/g allowed · 1,878 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -6.2 /g · -31 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 6 taken, 4 given · +0.40 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 2h 35m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 565.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 74 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.096 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.124 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Liberty6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (244.0 yds/g · 488 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (12.0 pts/g · 24 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (460.0 yds/g allowed · 920 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49.0 pts/g allowed · 98 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-37.0 /g · -74 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6 in these games · 1 taken, 7 given · -3.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:38 /g · 0h 51m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 94.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.292 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.137 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20182018 New Mexico StateFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #11
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 BYU #69 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Scoring offensemedian #11
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 BYU #56 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Total defensemedian #11
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 BYU #22 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Scoring defensemedian #6
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2018 BYU #28 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 6.
Point marginmedian #3
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #3 of 74; 2018 BYU #46 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 3.
Turnover marginmedian #14
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #14 of 74; 2018 BYU #25 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 14.
Possessionmedian #25
Possession. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 BYU #25 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #46 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 25.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Massachusetts #10 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #25 of 130; 2018 BYU #38 of 130; 2018 Army #90 of 130. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, ranked 100 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #84
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 BYU #17 of 130; 2018 Massachusetts #31 of 130; 2018 Army #84 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #109 of 130. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, ranked 88 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 84.
Returning rushingmedian #67
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Massachusetts #2 of 130; 2018 BYU #58 of 130; 2018 Army #67 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #97 of 130. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, ranked 122 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 67.
Team talentmedian #99
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 130; 2018 BYU #56 of 130; 2018 Massachusetts #99 of 130; 2018 Army #128 of 130; 2018 Liberty #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, ranked 127 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 99.
Offensive EPAmedian #10
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 74; 2018 BYU #50 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 10.
Defensive EPAmedian #9
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #9 of 74; 2018 BYU #50 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 9.
Offensive success ratemedian #23
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #23 of 74; 2018 BYU #40 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 23.
Defensive success ratemedian #8
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #8 of 74; 2018 BYU #55 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 8.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #19
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #19 of 74; 2018 BYU #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 19.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #5
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 BYU #5 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #12 of 74. Marked: 2018 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 5.