Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

FBS Independents

FBS Independents, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019New Mexico State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 130 teams · 361.1 yds/g · 4,333 yards)#108 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#126 (of 130 teams · 479.9 yds/g allowed · 5,759 yards)#129 (of 130 teams · 41.0 pts/g allowed · 492 points)#125 (of 130 teams · -19.3 /g · -232 on the season)#128 (of 130 teams · -15 on the season · 12 taken, 27 given · -1.25 /g)#116 (of 130 teams · 27:11 /g · 5h 26m on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 269.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 130 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 130 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#124 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 130 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 130 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #28–#126. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#67 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #13–#118. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #18–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #8–#130. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#55 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #4–#128. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#99 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#127. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#104. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#98. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#82 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#114 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #14–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #26–#127. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #17–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #28–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#59 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #8–#96. 2 of 6 in the top 10.)
2019Army580 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#89 (of 130 teams · 379.1 yds/g · 4,929 yards)#67 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#30 (of 130 teams · 342.3 yds/g allowed · 4,450 yards)#41 (of 130 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#47 (of 130 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.08 /g)#15 (of 130 teams · 32:39 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#49 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 265.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 130 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#77 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 130 teams · 1.046 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 130 teams · 1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019BYU760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Boise State, #22 USC)#28 (of 130 teams · 443.7 yds/g · 5,768 yards)#67 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#69 (of 130 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 5,118 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#55 (of 130 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#71 (of 130 teams · 29:47 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#79 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's passing production returning)#31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 560.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 130 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 130 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 130 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Liberty850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 130 teams · 439.4 yds/g · 5,712 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#81 (of 130 teams · 412.2 yds/g allowed · 5,359 yards)#68 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#51 (of 130 teams · +4.8 /g · +62 on the season)#51 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g)#109 (of 130 teams · 27:53 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#129 (of 130 teams · 153.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 130 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 130 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#58 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 130 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Massachusetts1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#126 (of 130 teams · 293.1 yds/g · 3,517 yards)#118 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 237 points)#130 (of 130 teams · 559.5 yds/g allowed · 6,714 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 52.7 pts/g allowed · 632 points)#130 (of 130 teams · -32.9 /g · -395 on the season)#55 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#127 (of 130 teams · 26:04 /g · 5h 13m on the season)#104 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 358.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#127 (of 130 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#130 (of 130 teams · 0.403 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 130 teams · 34% of plays successful)#130 (of 130 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 130 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 130 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Notre Dame1122 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia)#46 (of 130 teams · 429.9 yds/g · 5,589 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#18 (of 130 teams · 320.2 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +245 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17 on the season · 28 taken, 11 given · +1.31 /g)#99 (of 130 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 130 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 130 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20192019 New Mexico StateFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #28 of 130; 2019 Liberty #33 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #46 of 130; 2019 Army #89 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 102 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #67
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #13 of 130; 2019 Liberty #34 of 130; 2019 Army #67 of 130; 2019 BYU #67 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 108 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 67.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #18 of 130; 2019 Army #30 of 130; 2019 BYU #69 of 130; 2019 Liberty #81 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 126 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #12 of 130; 2019 Army #41 of 130; 2019 BYU #48 of 130; 2019 Liberty #68 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 129 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #8 of 130; 2019 Army #47 of 130; 2019 Liberty #51 of 130; 2019 BYU #55 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 125 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #55
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #4 of 130; 2019 Liberty #51 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #55 of 130; 2019 BYU #60 of 130; 2019 Army #70 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 128 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 55.
Possessionmedian #99
Possession. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #15 of 130; 2019 BYU #71 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #99 of 130; 2019 Liberty #109 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 116 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 99.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #31 of 130; 2019 Army #38 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #68 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #104 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 34 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #20 of 130; 2019 BYU #31 of 130; 2019 Army #49 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #75 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #98 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 42 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #82
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #22 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #82 of 130; 2019 Army #94 of 130; 2019 BYU #100 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 12 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 82.
Team talentmedian #114
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #14 of 130; 2019 BYU #68 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #114 of 130; 2019 Army #128 of 130; 2019 Liberty #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 127 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 114.
Offensive EPAmedian #29
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #26 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #28 of 130; 2019 Army #29 of 130; 2019 BYU #65 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 109 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 29.
Defensive EPAmedian #68
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #17 of 130; 2019 BYU #53 of 130; 2019 Liberty #68 of 130; 2019 Army #81 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 68.
Offensive success ratemedian #36
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #12 of 130; 2019 BYU #33 of 130; 2019 Liberty #36 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #37 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 104 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 36.
Defensive success ratemedian #76
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #28 of 130; 2019 Liberty #58 of 130; 2019 BYU #76 of 130; 2019 Army #77 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 124 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 76.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #59
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #31 of 130; 2019 Liberty #53 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #59 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 Army #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 108 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 59.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #45
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #8 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #9 of 130; 2019 Army #45 of 130; 2019 Liberty #82 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #96 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 46 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 45.