THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. New Mexico State played 3 such games.

FBS Independents, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019New Mexico State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 257.3 yds/g · 772 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 6.7 pts/g · 20 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 609.0 yds/g allowed · 1,827 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 53.7 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -47.0 /g · -141 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 1 taken, 6 given · -1.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 27:35 /g · 1h 23m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 269.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.473 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.082 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.553 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#49 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #11–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#53 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #11–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#61 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #42–#72. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#104. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#98. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#82 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#114 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #14–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #27–#69. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #18–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #27–#65. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #25–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #4–#73. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#5 — top 10 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #1–#73. 2 of 6 in the top 10.)
2019Notre Dame11–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia)#31 (of 73 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 3,560 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 275 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 326.7 yds/g allowed · 2,940 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 73 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.138 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019BYU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Boise State, #22 USC)#49 (of 73 teams · 356.3 yds/g · 1,425 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 90 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 1,715 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 128 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · -9.5 /g · -38 in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 6 taken, 6 given · +0.00 /g · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 25:45 /g · 1h 43m in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 560.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 73 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 41% of plays successful · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Army5–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (243.0 yds/g · 243 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (340.0 yds/g allowed · 340 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.0 /g · -3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:35 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 265.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.806 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Massachusetts1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (307.0 yds/g · 614 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.5 pts/g · 27 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (482.0 yds/g allowed · 964 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46.5 pts/g allowed · 93 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-33.0 /g · -66 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 6 taken, 3 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:01 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#104 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 358.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.292 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.382 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Liberty8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 73 teams · 346.3 yds/g · 1,039 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 61 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 443.3 yds/g allowed · 1,330 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 41.0 pts/g allowed · 123 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -20.7 /g · -62 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 3 taken, 7 given · -1.33 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:04 /g · 1h 12m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 153.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 73 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 0.264 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.444 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20192019 New Mexico StateFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #49
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #31 of 73; 2019 BYU #49 of 73; 2019 Liberty #54 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 71 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 49.
Scoring offensemedian #47
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #20 of 73; 2019 BYU #47 of 73; 2019 Liberty #55 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 47.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #11 of 73; 2019 BYU #45 of 73; 2019 Liberty #51 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #15 of 73; 2019 BYU #48 of 73; 2019 Liberty #70 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #53
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #15 of 73; 2019 BYU #53 of 73; 2019 Liberty #66 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 53.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #11 of 73; 2019 BYU #34 of 73; 2019 Liberty #69 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 71 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #61
Possession. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #42 of 73; 2019 BYU #68 of 73; 2019 Liberty #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 61 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 61.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #31 of 130; 2019 Army #38 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #68 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #104 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 34 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #20 of 130; 2019 BYU #31 of 130; 2019 Army #49 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #75 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #98 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 42 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #82
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #22 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #82 of 130; 2019 Army #94 of 130; 2019 BYU #100 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 12 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 82.
Team talentmedian #114
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #14 of 130; 2019 BYU #68 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #114 of 130; 2019 Army #128 of 130; 2019 Liberty #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 127 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 114.
Offensive EPAmedian #55
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #27 of 73; 2019 BYU #55 of 73; 2019 Liberty #58 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 69 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 55.
Defensive EPAmedian #40
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #18 of 73; 2019 BYU #40 of 73; 2019 Liberty #57 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 40.
Offensive success ratemedian #38
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #27 of 73; 2019 BYU #38 of 73; 2019 Liberty #65 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 64 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Defensive success ratemedian #45
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #25 of 73; 2019 BYU #45 of 73; 2019 Liberty #55 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 71 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 45.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #37
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #4 of 73; 2019 Notre Dame #37 of 73; 2019 BYU #57 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 37.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #5
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #1 of 73; 2019 Notre Dame #5 of 73; 2019 Liberty #22 of 73. Marked: 2019 New Mexico State, ranked 73 of 73. FBS Independents median rank 5.